Skip to content
damages-calculator logo

Personal Injury Damages Calculator

damages-calculator

Builds auditable personal injury damages calculations separating special damages (medical, wage loss, out-of-pocket) from general damages (pain and suffering) using multiplier and per diem methods. Trigger when the user mentions PI damages calculation, personal injury valuation, demand package da...

CaseMark/skills0installs44stars

SKILL.md

Full skill instructions

Personal Injury Damages Calculator

Produces a defensible, auditable PI damages model: every figure traced to a source document, billed and paid columns carried, general damages justified by methodology, and adjustments (comparative fault, liens, caps) applied transparently.

Quick Start

  1. Gather incident, billing, medical, wage, and future care documents (Intake below)
  2. Structure the model with special damages, general damages, and adjustments sections
  3. Calculate each category with source-traced line items
  4. Apply jurisdictional adjustments and produce final demand summary
  5. Verify with Quality Audit checklist before delivery

Intake (Mandatory)

Ask every time unless user says "use defaults" or "just draft":

  1. Incident & liability — date, mechanism, parties, comparative fault, prior injuries, jurisdiction
  2. Insurance — BI limits, med-pay/​PIP, UM/​UIM, coverage disputes
  3. Medical billing — itemized bills, EOBs (billed/​paid/​adjusted), lien statements (Medicare, Medicaid, ERISA), pharmacy, DME
  4. Medical records — EMS, ER, imaging, operative reports, PT, pain management, discharge summaries
  5. Wage/​employment — employer verification, 13+ weeks pay stubs, W-2s/​1099s (3 years), disability notes, FMLA/​STD, used PTO/​sick time
  6. Replacement services — home care, childcare, cleaning, transport invoices
  7. General damages support — pain journal, witness statements, injury photos, mental health records, functional limitations
  8. Future care — life care plan, surgeon recommendations, PT plan, vocational evidence

Defaults if user doesn't respond: carry both billed and paid columns; present multiplier and per diem for general damages; flag comparative fault and liens for attorney resolution; flag jurisdictional rules [VERIFY].

Pause for missing categories before finalizing numbers.

Step 1: Model Structure

Line-item table format: date, provider/​source, amount billed, amount paid, causation notes.

Medical expense measure — critical decision:

MeasureWhen
Billed chargesCollateral source rule jurisdictions (e.g., NY)
Paid/​incurredHowell v. Hamilton Meats, 52 Cal. 4th 541 (2011) jurisdictions
Reasonable valueReasonable value standard jurisdictions

If counsel cannot specify, carry both columns and flag for attorney determination.

Sections: A. Special damages (past/​future medical, past/​future wages, out-of-pocket, replacement services) · B. General damages (pain/​suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment, disfigurement, consortium) · C. Adjustments (comparative fault, offsets, policy limits, liens, statutory caps)

Step 2: Past Medical Specials

Extract per line item: service date, provider, CPT/​DRG code, amount billed, amount paid/​adjusted.

Causation screen (all three required):

  • Temporality — treatment began promptly for complained-of body parts
  • Consistency — records document injury complaints throughout
  • Medical necessity — care related to diagnosis and mechanism

Flag items failing any criterion as "potentially contested."

Columns: gross billed → contractual adjustments → insurer payments → patient responsibility → outstanding balances/​liens.

Ancillary: co-pays, Rx, OTC (if documented), DME, mileage, parking, childcare for visits.

Step 3: Wage Loss Specials

  1. Establish disability period from work notes/​restrictions — flag gaps between incident and first visit
  2. Calculate wage base:
TypeMethod
HourlyAvg weekly hours × rate from pay stubs
SalariedAnnual ÷ 52
Tipped/​commissionHistorical earnings documentation
Self-employedTax returns + P&L (gross ≠ earnings); flag for expert if large
  1. Add lost overtime, bonuses, used PTO/​sick, lost employer benefits (retirement match, health premiums)
  2. State gross vs. net methodology explicitly; flag tax treatment for jurisdictional review

Step 4: Future Economic Damages

Only calculate with evidentiary foundation. Typically requires expert testimony for admissibility.

SourceApproach
Life care planUse plan categories and totals directly
Specific recommendationUnit cost × quantity; label assumption-based
Vague reference ("may need surgery")Do NOT assign dollar figure; flag for medical opinion

Present value: Discount projected costs at appropriate rate; account for medical inflation. Flag methodology for jurisdictional verification.

Future earning capacity: BLS work-life expectancy tables. Without expert input, produce labeled "scenario analysis" (conservative/​aggressive) with all assumptions marked.

Step 5: General Damages

Build harm narrative from records before calculating: pain duration/​intensity, objective findings, treatment invasiveness, daily life disruption, permanency/​scarring.

Multiplier Method

Total economic damages × severity factor:

SeverityRangeIndicators
Mild/​full recovery1.5–2×Soft tissue, short treatment, full resolution
Moderate2–3×Extended treatment, residual symptoms, functional limits
Severe3–5×Surgery, permanent impairment, disfigurement, prolonged disability

Never select a multiplier without articulating severity justification.

Per Diem Method

Daily rate by recovery phase:

PhaseRateExample
AcuteHigher$200–400/​day
SubacuteModerate$100–200/​day
Residual/​chronicLower$50–100/​day

Benchmark: plaintiff's daily earnings (a day of pain ≥ a day of work).

Present both methods. Convergence strengthens demand; divergence requires reassessment. Flag per diem trial permissibility — some courts prohibit per diem arguments [VERIFY].

Step 6: Adjustments and Final Summary

Double-counting check:

  • Wage loss not also counted as diminished earning capacity
  • No overlapping facility/​global charges
  • Non-economic subcategories as single total with narrative components, not additive line items (unless jurisdiction requires)

Comparative fault:

RegimeRule
Pure comparativeRecovery reduced by plaintiff's % fault
50%-bar modifiedNo recovery if plaintiff ≥ 50% at fault
51%-bar modifiedNo recovery if plaintiff ≥ 51% at fault

Present gross damages, then risk-adjusted range if fault disputed.

Collateral source: Show both billed and paid; flag recoverable measure for attorney.

Liens: Net-to-client sensitivity analysis when data available. Flag resolution steps (Medicare conditional payments, ERISA reimbursement).

Statutory caps: Uncapped value + capped maximum as separate lines. Flag med-mal caps, government entity limits [VERIFY].

Policy limits: Present full case value separately; note how limits affect demand posture.

Output Structure

  1. Past medical (billed/​paid)
  2. Future medical (if supported)
  3. Past wage loss
  4. Future wages / diminished earning capacity (if supported)
  5. Other out-of-pocket
  6. Non-economic damages (method justified)
  7. Total demand
  8. Notes: liens, caps, jurisdictional issues

Every figure must trace to a document. Missing documents → label as estimate.

Post-Draft Alignment (Mandatory)

Ask after delivering initial calculation:

  1. Billed or paid as primary medical expense measure?
  2. Is comparative fault estimate accurate?
  3. Additional lien holders unaccounted for?
  4. Does general damages result align with counsel's valuation?

If no response, recommend resolving billed-vs-paid (highest-impact variable) and proceed if authorized.

Quality Audit

  • Every dollar traces to source document (or labeled estimate)
  • Both billed and paid columns carried until counsel selects
  • Causation screen applied to each medical charge
  • Wage loss methodology correct for employment type
  • Future damages supported by evidence, not speculation
  • General damages justified by both multiplier and per diem
  • No double-counting between categories
  • Comparative fault applied correctly for jurisdiction
  • Lien accounting complete with net-to-client analysis
  • Statutory caps identified and applied
  • All legal rules verified or flagged [VERIFY]
  • Assumptions documented prominently

Jurisdiction Checklist

Flag and resolve before finalizing:

  • Collateral source / billed vs. paid rule
  • Comparative negligence regime and threshold
  • Non-economic damages caps (by case type)
  • No-fault/​PIP serious injury threshold
  • Per diem argument permissibility
  • Present value discount requirements
  • Joint and several liability rules
  • Wrongful death framework (if applicable)
  • Loss of consortium availability

Pitfalls

  • No invented data. Never fabricate citations, verdict data, or "average settlement values." Use [VERIFY] for any unconfirmed citation.
  • No speculative futures. Do not assign future damages figures without medical support.
  • All legal rules verified or flagged. Caps, collateral source, comparative negligence — verify or mark [VERIFY].
  • Ethics: ABA Model Rules 1.1, 3.1, 4.1, 3.3.
  • Scope notice: "Attorney work product draft requiring review. Jurisdictional rules must be verified. Figures based on provided documentation and stated assumptions."

More skills from CaseMark

Creates structured operative notes with findings, technique, specimens, and estimated blood loss. Use when dictating operative reports, documenting surgical procedures, or recording intraoperative findings.

44 0
View
hipaa-privacy-notice logo
CaseMark/skills

hipaa-privacy-notice

Drafts a HIPAA-compliant Notice of Privacy Practices per 45 CFR § 164.520 for covered entities. Produces patient-accessible documents covering permitted PHI uses/disclosures, individual rights, breach notification, and complaint procedures. Use when drafting HIPAA privacy notices, NPP documents, ...

44 0
View
case-briefs logo
CaseMark/skills

case-briefs

Generates structured case briefs from judicial opinions. Use when the user provides a court opinion and needs a case brief, case summary, or distillation of a judicial decision for legal research.

44 0
View

Negotiates bespoke enterprise API addenda that override standard click-wrap terms for high-value partners. Covers document precedence, indemnification and liability caps, SLA/service-credit design, exclusivity, API versioning governance, data rights, and internal alignment. Triggers when user men...

44 0
View
aviation-law-summary logo
CaseMark/skills

aviation-law-summary

Produces structured aviation law summaries with Bluebook citations covering U.S. and international regulatory frameworks, treaties, and case law. Use when drafting an aviation law summary, FAA/DOT/TSA compliance overview, Montreal/Warsaw Convention liability analysis, air service agreement review...

44 0
View
appellate-formatting logo
CaseMark/skills

appellate-formatting

Generates appellate-filing-ready Tables of Contents, Tables of Authorities, and Certificates of Compliance under FRAP 32(g) and related rules. Produces defensible word-count calculations with transparent exclusions and anti-hallucination guardrails for pagination and citations. Covers federal cir...

44 0
View
transcription logo
CaseMark/skills

transcription

Transcribes audio and video files through case.dev with speaker diarization. Supports MP3, WAV, M4A, FLAC, OGG, WEBM, MP4 up to 5GB. Use when the user mentions "transcribe", "transcription", "deposition recording", "hearing audio", "speaker labels", or needs to convert audio/video to text.

44 0
View

Produces a structured, source-cited summary of U.S. employment disputes for HR and litigation review. Trigger when asked to summarize an employee dispute, employment litigation, HR investigation, EEOC/agency matter, discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wrongful termination, wage-hour dispute,...

44 0
View
auth-packet-summary logo
CaseMark/skills

auth-packet-summary

Validates and summarizes the four required authorization forms in a personal injury matter (retainer, HIPAA release, insurance authorization, employment record release). Confirms signatures, dates, scope, and completeness to determine readiness for the investigation phase. Use when reviewing clie...

44 0
View
cbp-binding-ruling logo
CaseMark/skills

cbp-binding-ruling

Drafts U.S. Customs and Border Protection binding ruling requests under 19 CFR Part 177 for tariff classification, valuation, origin, and marking determinations. Trigger when input mentions "binding ruling," "CBP ruling request," "19 CFR Part 177," "classification request," "HTSUS analysis," "tra...

44 0
View

Popular AI tools

Kaiber logo
Video

Kaiber

Generate, edit, and beat-sync AI video with leading models in one workspace.

Paid
View
Vimcal logo
Productivity

Vimcal

The world's fastest calendar for remote work

Free
View

Transform Your Design with AI Designer by ImgCreator.ai

Freemium
View
Akool AI logo
Content & writing

Akool AI

Revolutionizing Video Production with AI-Powered Creativity

Paid
View

Extend an image past the frame and let AI fill the new aspect ratio.

Freemium
View
StarByFace logo
Security

StarByFace

Discover your celebrity doppelgänger with StarByFace!

Free
View
C

ChainClarity explains 700+ crypto whitepapers in plain English, with layered summaries, comparisons, research tools, alerts, and a $4.99 Pro plan.

Freemium
View
Opus Clip logo
Coding & apps

Opus Clip

Opus.ai: Revolutionize Your Web Experience

Free
View