Skip to content
recsys-pipeline-architect logo

Recsys Pipeline Architect

recsys-pipeline-architect

Design composable recommendation, ranking, and feed pipelines using the six-stage Source→Hydrator→Filter→Scorer→Selector→SideEffect framework popularized by xAI's open-sourced For You algorithm. Use this skill whenever the user is building any system that picks "the top K items for a (user, context)" — social feeds, content CMSs, RAG rerankers, task prioritizers, notification triage, search reranking, ad ranking.

affaan-m/ecc5.3Kinstalls273.3Kstars

SKILL.md

Full skill instructions

recsys-pipeline-architect

A spec-and-scaffold skill for building composable recommendation, ranking, and feed pipelines. It encodes the six-stage pattern — Source → Hydrator → Filter → Scorer → Selector → SideEffect — popularized by xAI's open-sourced For You algorithm (Apache 2.0). This skill is an independent reimplementation of the pattern (MIT) — no code copied from the original.

Upstream: https://github.com/mturac/recsys-pipeline-architect

When to Use

  • User wants to build any system that picks "the top K items for a user/​context"
  • User asks "how should I rank X" or describes a feed/​personalization problem
  • User has a scoring function and needs the pipeline plumbing around it
  • User wants to migrate from a single relevance score to multi-action prediction with tunable weights
  • User is wrapping an LLM/​ML scorer and needs filters, hydrators, side-effects, and a runnable scaffold in their stack (TypeScript / Go / Python)
  • Triggers: "recommendation system", "feed algorithm", "ranking pipeline", "for you feed", "candidate pipeline", "content recommender", "pipeline architecture for recsys", "RAG retrieval reranker"

When NOT to Use

  • Model architecture work (transformer design, two-tower retrieval, embedding training) — this skill is plumbing around the model, not the model itself
  • Pure ML training pipelines — the scoring function is the user's responsibility
  • Operating a deployed pipeline (monitoring, autoscaling) — out of scope

The six-stage framework

#StageJobParallel?
1SourceFetch candidates from one or more originsYes — multiple sources run in parallel
2HydratorEnrich each candidate with metadata needed for filtering and scoringYes — independent hydrators run in parallel
3FilterDrop candidates that should never be shown (blocked, expired, duplicate, ineligible)Sequential — each filter sees fewer items
4ScorerAssign each surviving candidate one or more scoresSequential — later scorers see earlier scores
5SelectorSort by final score, return top KSingle op
6SideEffectCache served IDs, log impressions, emit events, update countersAsync — must never block the response

Why this exact order

  • Sources before hydration: know what candidates exist before paying to enrich them
  • Hydration before filtering: many filters need metadata the source did not provide
  • Filtering before scoring: scoring is the expensive stage; drop the ineligible first
  • Scorer chain (not single scorer): real systems compose ML scoring + diversity reranking + business rules
  • Selector after scoring: keeps scoring deterministic and cacheable
  • SideEffects last and async: side effects must never block the user response

Workflow when invoked

Walk the user through these eight steps:

  1. Clarify the use case (one round, three questions): items being ranked? input context? language/​runtime?
  2. Identify the candidate sources: usually in-network (followed/​owned/​subscribed) + out-of-network (ML retrieval / trending / similar-to-liked)
  3. List required hydrations: for each filter and scorer, what data does it need that the source did not provide?
  4. List the filters: duplicate, self, age, block/​mute, previously-served, eligibility. Order matters — cheap before expensive.
  5. Design the scorer chain: primary (ML) → combiner (multi-action with weights) → diversity → business rules
  6. Selector: sort descending by final score, take top K (or stratified mix for in-network/​out-of-network)
  7. SideEffects: cache served IDs, emit impression events, update counters, log analytics — all fire-and-forget
  8. Generate the scaffold in the user's stack

Key trade-offs to surface (don't default silently)

1. Single score vs multi-action prediction

  • Single score: train one model to predict relevance. To change behavior → retrain.
  • Multi-action: predict P(action) for many actions (read, like, share, skip, report), combine with weights at serving time. To change behavior → change weights. No retraining.

The X For You system uses multi-action with both positive and negative weights. Recommend multi-action when the user expects to tune frequently.

2. Candidate isolation in scoring

  • Isolated: each candidate scored independently. Deterministic, cacheable.
  • Joint: candidates attend to each other during scoring (e.g., transformer over batch). More expressive but non-deterministic across batches.

Default to isolation. Joint only when there's a specific reason (e.g., explicit batch-aware diversity).

3. Online vs offline

  • Request-time (online): pipeline runs on each request. Latency budget: 100–300ms. Default.
  • Pre-computed (offline batch): pipeline runs periodically, results cached. Lower latency, lower freshness.
  • Hybrid: candidate retrieval offline, ranking online.

Hard rules

  1. Do not invent benchmark numbers. "How much faster?" → "depends on workload, run it yourself."
  2. Attribution discipline. When the pattern is referenced, attribute as "popularized by xAI's open-sourced For You algorithm" / github.com/​xai-org/​x-algorithm (Apache 2.0).
  3. No trademark use. Do not name the user's artifact "X-like" or use "For You" branding. Pattern is free; brand is not. Suggested naming: "candidate pipeline", "feed pipeline", "ranking pipeline", "recsys pipeline".
  4. Surface trade-offs. Multi-action vs single, isolation vs joint, online vs offline — never default silently.
  5. The generated scaffold must run. No pseudocode passing as code.
  6. Filter order matters. Cheap before expensive. Universal before user-specific.
  7. Side effects never block. Wrap in fire-and-forget patterns (goroutines / promises without await / asyncio tasks).

Anti-Patterns

  • Scoring before filtering (wastes compute on candidates that will be dropped anyway)
  • Synchronous side effects (cache writes / impression emits blocking the response)
  • A single "relevance" score when the product needs to tune for multiple objectives (engagement vs safety vs diversity vs ads)
  • Joint scoring as default (non-deterministic, harder to cache, doesn't compose with reranking stages)
  • Generating pseudocode "for illustration" — the scaffold must actually run

Upstream contents

The upstream repository at https://github.com/mturac/recsys-pipeline-architect ships:

  • Full SKILL.md with the complete 8-step workflow
  • 5 load-on-demand reference docs: interfaces in 4 languages (TS/​Go/​Python/​Rust), multi-action scoring pattern, candidate isolation, filter cookbook (12 patterns), scorer cookbook (weighted sum, MMR, diversity penalty, position debiasing)
  • 3 runnable example scaffolds, every one green on its test suite:
    • Strapi v5 plugin (TypeScript / Jest — 3/​3 pass)
    • Zentra-compatible pipeline (Go with generics — 3/​3 pass)
    • PMAI task prioritizer (Python / FastAPI / pytest — 3/​3 pass)
  • v0.1.0 release tagged
  • MIT license; pattern attributed to xAI X For You algorithm (Apache 2.0)

Install via skills.sh: npx skills add mturac/​recsys-pipeline-architect

More skills from affaan-m

coding-standards logo
affaan-m/ecc

coding-standards

Baseline cross-project coding conventions for naming, readability, immutability, and code-quality review. Use detailed frontend or backend skills for framework-specific patterns.

273.3K 14K
View
golang-testing logo
affaan-m/ecc

golang-testing

Go testing patterns including table-driven tests, subtests, benchmarks, fuzzing, and test coverage. Follows TDD methodology with idiomatic Go practices.

273.3K 13.1K
View
docker-patterns logo
affaan-m/ecc

docker-patterns

Docker and Docker Compose patterns for local development, container security, networking, volume strategies, and multi-service orchestration.

273.3K 12.7K
View

Spring Boot architecture patterns, REST API design, layered services, data access, caching, async processing, and logging. Use for Java Spring Boot backend work.

273.3K 12.2K
View
video-editing logo
affaan-m/ecc

video-editing

AI-assisted video editing workflows for cutting, structuring, and augmenting real footage. Covers the full pipeline from raw capture through FFmpeg, Remotion, ElevenLabs, fal.ai, and final polish in Descript or CapCut. Use when the user wants to edit video, cut footage, create vlogs, or build video content.

273.3K 12.2K
View
python-patterns logo
affaan-m/ecc

python-patterns

Pythonic idioms, PEP 8 standards, type hints, and best practices for building robust, efficient, and maintainable Python applications.

273.3K 12.1K
View
frontend-slides logo
affaan-m/ecc

frontend-slides

Create stunning, animation-rich HTML presentations from scratch or by converting PowerPoint files. Use when the user wants to build a presentation, convert a PPT/PPTX to web, or create slides for a talk/pitch. Helps non-designers discover their aesthetic through visual exploration rather than abstract choices.

273.3K 12.1K
View
api-design logo
affaan-m/ecc

api-design

REST API design patterns including resource naming, status codes, pagination, filtering, error responses, versioning, and rate limiting for production APIs.

273.3K 11.9K
View
django-patterns logo
affaan-m/ecc

django-patterns

Django architecture patterns, REST API design with DRF, ORM best practices, caching, signals, middleware, and production-grade Django apps.

273.3K 11.9K
View
postgres-patterns logo
affaan-m/ecc

postgres-patterns

PostgreSQL database patterns for query optimization, schema design, indexing, and security. Based on Supabase best practices.

273.3K 11.9K
View
tdd-workflow logo
affaan-m/ecc

tdd-workflow

Use this skill when writing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code. Enforces test-driven development with 80%+ coverage including unit, integration, and E2E tests.

273.3K 11.6K
View
prompt-optimizer logo
affaan-m/ecc

prompt-optimizer

Analyze raw prompts, identify intent and gaps, match ECC components (skills/commands/agents/hooks), and output a ready-to-paste optimized prompt. Advisory role only — never executes the task itself. TRIGGER when: user says "optimize prompt", "improve my prompt", "how to write a prompt for", "help me prompt", "rewrite this prompt", or explicitly asks to enhance prompt quality. Also triggers on Chinese equivalents: "优化prompt", "改进prompt", "怎么写prompt", "帮我优化这个指令". DO NOT TRIGGER when: user wants the task executed directly, or says "just do it" / "直接做". DO NOT TRIGGER when user says "优化代码", "优化性能", "optimize performance", "optimize this code" — those are refactoring/performance tasks, not prompt optimization.

273.3K 11.3K
View

Popular AI tools

Kaiber logo
Video

Kaiber

Generate, edit, and beat-sync AI video with leading models in one workspace.

Paid
View
Vimcal logo
Productivity

Vimcal

The world's fastest calendar for remote work

Free
View

Transform Your Design with AI Designer by ImgCreator.ai

Freemium
View
Akool AI logo
Content & writing

Akool AI

Revolutionizing Video Production with AI-Powered Creativity

Paid
View

Extend an image past the frame and let AI fill the new aspect ratio.

Freemium
View
StarByFace logo
Security

StarByFace

Discover your celebrity doppelgänger with StarByFace!

Free
View
C

ChainClarity explains 700+ crypto whitepapers in plain English, with layered summaries, comparisons, research tools, alerts, and a $4.99 Pro plan.

Freemium
View
Opus Clip logo
Coding & apps

Opus Clip

Opus.ai: Revolutionize Your Web Experience

Free
View