Skip to content
gateguard logo

GateGuard — Fact-Forcing Pre-Action Gate

gateguard

Fact-forcing gate that blocks Edit/Write/Bash (including MultiEdit) and demands concrete investigation (importers, data schemas, user instruction) before allowing the action. Measurably improves output quality by +2.25 points vs ungated agents.

affaan-m/ecc7.2Kinstalls273.3Kstars

SKILL.md

Full skill instructions

GateGuard — Fact-Forcing Pre-Action Gate

A PreToolUse hook that forces Claude to investigate before editing. Instead of self-evaluation ("are you sure?"), it demands concrete facts. The act of investigation creates awareness that self-evaluation never did.

When to Activate

  • Working on any codebase where file edits affect multiple modules
  • Projects with data files that have specific schemas or date formats
  • Teams where AI-generated code must match existing patterns
  • Any workflow where Claude tends to guess instead of investigating

Core Concept

LLM self-evaluation doesn't work. Ask "did you violate any policies?" and the answer is always "no." This is verified experimentally.

But asking "list every file that imports this module" forces the LLM to run Grep and Read. The investigation itself creates context that changes the output.

Three-stage gate:

1. DENY  — block the first Edit/​Write/​Bash attempt
2. FORCE — tell the model exactly which facts to gather
3. ALLOW — permit retry after facts are presented

No competitor does all three. Most stop at deny.

Evidence

Two independent A/​B tests, identical agents, same task:

TaskGatedUngatedGap
Analytics module8.0/​106.5/​10+1.5
Webhook validator10.0/​107.0/​10+3.0
Average9.06.75+2.25

Both agents produce code that runs and passes tests. The difference is design depth.

Gate Types

Edit / MultiEdit Gate (first edit per file)

MultiEdit is handled identically — each file in the batch is gated individually.

Before editing {file_path}, present these facts:

1. List ALL files that import/​require this file (search the tree — Glob/​Grep, or find/​grep via Bash)
2. List the public functions/​classes affected by this change
3. If this file reads/​writes data files, show field names, structure,
   and date format (use redacted or synthetic values, not raw production data)
4. Quote the user's current instruction verbatim

Write Gate (first new file creation)

Before creating {file_path}, present these facts:

1. Name the file(s) and line(s) that will call this new file
2. Confirm no existing file serves the same purpose (search the tree — Glob/​Grep, or find/​grep via Bash)
3. If this file reads/​writes data files, show field names, structure,
   and date format (use redacted or synthetic values, not raw production data)
4. Quote the user's current instruction verbatim

Destructive Bash Gate (every destructive command)

Triggers on: rm -rf, git reset --hard, git push --force, drop table, etc.

1. List all files/​data this command will modify or delete
2. Write a one-line rollback procedure
3. Quote the user's current instruction verbatim

Routine Bash Gate (once per session)

1. The current user request in one sentence
2. What this specific command verifies or produces

Parallel Batches and Partial Application

The first-touch gate evaluates each tool call independently. When several edits to a file that has not been touched yet are sent in one parallel batch, the first call is denied and the denial marks the file as checked, so the sibling edits in that batch are applied. Nothing is rolled back: the file can end up holding the sibling edits without the denied one.

The denial message names the file and warns that batch siblings may already have been applied. Treat it literally:

  • Send dependent edits to a not-yet-touched file sequentially, not in a parallel batch. A definition and its first use, or an import and its call site, must not ride in the same batch.
  • After a first-touch denial, present the facts, retry the denied edit, and re-read the file before building on anything else from the batch.

A batch-wide lock is not possible: hooks see tool calls one at a time, so the gate cannot know which calls arrived together.

Quick Start

Option A: Use the ECC hook (zero install)

The hook at scripts/​hooks/​gateguard-fact-force.js is included in this plugin. Enable it via hooks.json.

If GateGuard blocks setup or repair work, start the session with ECC_GATEGUARD=off. For hook-level control, keep using ECC_DISABLED_HOOKS with the GateGuard hook ID.

In long sessions, only the first GATEGUARD_FACT_FORCE_FULL_DENIALS fact-force denials (default 3) emit the full four-fact block; later denials are condensed to a single line carrying the denial ordinal, so near-identical blocks cannot accumulate in the context window and amplify model repetition loops (#2142). Retrying the same file or command after presenting facts never re-triggers the gate.

Graduated controls

ECC_GATEGUARD=off (or GATEGUARD_DISABLED=1) turns the gate off entirely. The variables in this table do not — each narrows one behaviour while the load-bearing destructive-Bash checks keep running:

VariableDefaultEffect
GATEGUARD_BASH_ROUTINE_DISABLEDunset (gate on)Disables the routine-Bash gate only. The destructive-Bash gate (rm -rf, git reset --hard, drop table, dd if=, …) is unaffected.
GATEGUARD_EXEMPT_GLOBSunset (no exemptions)Comma-separated globs; a matching Edit/​Write/​MultiEdit target skips first-touch fact-forcing. Intended for low-import-value trees (tests, generated artifacts, scratch dirs) where "who imports this / what schema" carries no signal.
GATEGUARD_FACT_FORCE_FULL_DENIALS3How many denials emit the full four-fact block before later ones condense to a single line. 0 condenses from the very first denial.
GATEGUARD_BASH_EXTRA_DESTRUCTIVEunsetExtra destructive-command patterns, as regex source, added to the built-in set. A malformed regex is treated as unset (built-ins still apply) and logged once to stderr.
GATEGUARD_STATE_DIR~/​.gateguardWhere per-session gate state is kept. If state cannot be persisted the gate allows the operation rather than looping, and names this variable in the warning.

GATEGUARD_BASH_ROUTINE_DISABLED accepts 1, true, on, enabled, enable, or yes (case- and whitespace-insensitive); any other value leaves the gate on.

Turning the gate off completely
VariableEffect
ECC_GATEGUARD=offDisables GateGuard for the session. Accepts 0, false, off, disabled, or disable.
GATEGUARD_DISABLED=1Same effect. Recognises 1 only — the spellings above do not apply here.

For hook-level control, keep using ECC_DISABLED_HOOKS with the GateGuard hook ID.

Glob semantics for GATEGUARD_EXEMPT_GLOBS

Patterns match the entire project-relative target path. The project root is CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR, falling back to the hook payload's cwd, then the hook process working directory. Relative globs never exempt targets outside that root. Explicit absolute globs match the entire absolute target path and may deliberately exempt paths outside the project.

Both patterns and paths use / separators and lowercase matching. * matches within a segment, ** across segments, and ? one non-separator character. **/ includes zero directories, so **/​tests/​** also matches tests/​foo.js. Malformed patterns are dropped without granting an exemption.

Since 2.2.1, services/​** only covers the project's root services tree, and *.md only covers its root Markdown files. Use **/​*.md for all Markdown files within the project. Existing unanchored exemptions may need adjustment:

{
  "env": {
    "GATEGUARD_BASH_ROUTINE_DISABLED": "1",
    "GATEGUARD_EXEMPT_GLOBS": "**/​tests/​**,tests/​**,**/​*.test.*,**/​docs/​**,**/​dist/​**"
  }
}

Option B: Full package with config

pip install gateguard-ai
gateguard init

This adds .gateguard.yml for per-project configuration (custom messages, ignore paths, gate toggles).

Anti-Patterns

  • Don't use self-evaluation instead. "Are you sure?" always gets "yes." This is experimentally verified.
  • Don't skip the data schema check. Both A/​B test agents assumed ISO-8601 dates when real data used %Y/%m/%d %H:%M. Checking data structure (with redacted values) prevents this entire class of bugs.
  • Don't gate every single Bash command. Routine bash gates once per session. Destructive bash gates every time. This balance avoids slowdown while catching real risks.

Best Practices

  • Let the gate fire naturally. Don't try to pre-answer the gate questions — the investigation itself is what improves quality.
  • Customize gate messages for your domain. If your project has specific conventions, add them to the gate prompts.
  • Use .gateguard.yml to ignore paths like .venv/, node_modules/, .git/.

Related Skills

  • safety-guard — Runtime safety checks (complementary, not overlapping)
  • code-reviewer — Post-edit review (GateGuard is pre-edit investigation)

More skills from affaan-m

coding-standards logo
affaan-m/ecc

coding-standards

Baseline cross-project coding conventions for naming, readability, immutability, and code-quality review. Use detailed frontend or backend skills for framework-specific patterns.

273.3K 14K
View
golang-testing logo
affaan-m/ecc

golang-testing

Go testing patterns including table-driven tests, subtests, benchmarks, fuzzing, and test coverage. Follows TDD methodology with idiomatic Go practices.

273.3K 13.1K
View
docker-patterns logo
affaan-m/ecc

docker-patterns

Docker and Docker Compose patterns for local development, container security, networking, volume strategies, and multi-service orchestration.

273.3K 12.7K
View

Spring Boot architecture patterns, REST API design, layered services, data access, caching, async processing, and logging. Use for Java Spring Boot backend work.

273.3K 12.2K
View
video-editing logo
affaan-m/ecc

video-editing

AI-assisted video editing workflows for cutting, structuring, and augmenting real footage. Covers the full pipeline from raw capture through FFmpeg, Remotion, ElevenLabs, fal.ai, and final polish in Descript or CapCut. Use when the user wants to edit video, cut footage, create vlogs, or build video content.

273.3K 12.2K
View
python-patterns logo
affaan-m/ecc

python-patterns

Pythonic idioms, PEP 8 standards, type hints, and best practices for building robust, efficient, and maintainable Python applications.

273.3K 12.1K
View
frontend-slides logo
affaan-m/ecc

frontend-slides

Create stunning, animation-rich HTML presentations from scratch or by converting PowerPoint files. Use when the user wants to build a presentation, convert a PPT/PPTX to web, or create slides for a talk/pitch. Helps non-designers discover their aesthetic through visual exploration rather than abstract choices.

273.3K 12.1K
View
api-design logo
affaan-m/ecc

api-design

REST API design patterns including resource naming, status codes, pagination, filtering, error responses, versioning, and rate limiting for production APIs.

273.3K 11.9K
View
django-patterns logo
affaan-m/ecc

django-patterns

Django architecture patterns, REST API design with DRF, ORM best practices, caching, signals, middleware, and production-grade Django apps.

273.3K 11.9K
View
postgres-patterns logo
affaan-m/ecc

postgres-patterns

PostgreSQL database patterns for query optimization, schema design, indexing, and security. Based on Supabase best practices.

273.3K 11.9K
View
tdd-workflow logo
affaan-m/ecc

tdd-workflow

Use this skill when writing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code. Enforces test-driven development with 80%+ coverage including unit, integration, and E2E tests.

273.3K 11.6K
View
prompt-optimizer logo
affaan-m/ecc

prompt-optimizer

Analyze raw prompts, identify intent and gaps, match ECC components (skills/commands/agents/hooks), and output a ready-to-paste optimized prompt. Advisory role only — never executes the task itself. TRIGGER when: user says "optimize prompt", "improve my prompt", "how to write a prompt for", "help me prompt", "rewrite this prompt", or explicitly asks to enhance prompt quality. Also triggers on Chinese equivalents: "优化prompt", "改进prompt", "怎么写prompt", "帮我优化这个指令". DO NOT TRIGGER when: user wants the task executed directly, or says "just do it" / "直接做". DO NOT TRIGGER when user says "优化代码", "优化性能", "optimize performance", "optimize this code" — those are refactoring/performance tasks, not prompt optimization.

273.3K 11.3K
View

Popular AI tools

Kaiber logo
Video

Kaiber

Generate, edit, and beat-sync AI video with leading models in one workspace.

Paid
View
Vimcal logo
Productivity

Vimcal

The world's fastest calendar for remote work

Free
View

Transform Your Design with AI Designer by ImgCreator.ai

Freemium
View
Akool AI logo
Content & writing

Akool AI

Revolutionizing Video Production with AI-Powered Creativity

Paid
View

Extend an image past the frame and let AI fill the new aspect ratio.

Freemium
View
StarByFace logo
Security

StarByFace

Discover your celebrity doppelgänger with StarByFace!

Free
View
C

ChainClarity explains 700+ crypto whitepapers in plain English, with layered summaries, comparisons, research tools, alerts, and a $4.99 Pro plan.

Freemium
View
Opus Clip logo
Coding & apps

Opus Clip

Opus.ai: Revolutionize Your Web Experience

Free
View