Quick facts
- Best for
- AI penetration testing that runs itself.
- Pricing
- Paid
- Editor rating
- 5 / 5
- Community saves
- 0
About Maced AI
Maced AI is an autonomous AI penetration testing platform that provides audit-ready reports compatible with SOC 2 and ISO 27001. Available for both black-box and white-box testing, it encompasses a range of testing areas including code, APIs, web applications, and infrastructure. Its AI agents probe an organization's code, APIs, and infrastructure and deliver comprehensive reports with proof of exploit and fixes. Specifically, Maced AI uses AI pentesting agents to crawl, fuzz, and exploit web applications and APIs which cover the OWASP Top 10, business logic flaws, and authentication bypasses. It undertakes deep source code analysis of repositories for injection flaws, hardcoded secrets, insecure dependencies, and vulnerable configurations. Moreover, it tests network services and validates infrastructure hardening against real-world attack techniques.In the event of an issue, Maced offers a continuum from detection to fixing in seconds. It ensures auto-validation of the findings, confirms exploitability with proof, and prioritizes by the real impact. In addition, auto-fixing is activated with one-click, generating a fix which is retested to confirm the vulnerability is eradicated, delivering a merge-ready PR. Finally, Maced AI continues this process with 24/7 pentesting coverage, detecting new issues when they appear, and instantly testing latest threats and CVEs. To maintain convenience, the platform runs pentests on a schedule that you determine, whether daily, weekly, or whenever you deploy a new product.
Pros
- Audit-ready reports
- Reports with exploit proofs
- Remediation guidance
- Checks OWASP Top 10Detection of business logic flaws
- Authentication bypass detection
- Deep source code analysis
- Cloud security testing
- Infrastructure security testing
- Network services testing
- Infrastructure hardening validation
- Real-world attack techniques testing
- Automatic issues detection
Cons
- Doesn't mention multiple language support
- No mobile application testing
- No explicit GDPR compliance
- Potentially high false positives
- Limited integration options
- No specified remediation validation
- Conflicting bug reports possible
- Requires source code for white-box testing
- Efficiency of continuous monitoring unspecified