Skip to content
finishing-a-development-branch logo

Finishing a Development Branch

finishing-a-development-branch

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup

SKILL.md

Full skill instructions

Finishing a Development Branch

Overview

Guide completion of development work by presenting clear options and handling chosen workflow.

Core principle: Verify tests → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.

Announce at start: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."

The Process

Step 1: Verify Tests

Before presenting options, verify tests pass:

# Run project's test suite
npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./​...

If tests fail:

Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing:

[Show failures]

Cannot proceed with merge/​PR until tests pass.

Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2.

If tests pass: Continue to Step 2.

Step 2: Determine Base Branch

# Try common base branches
git merge-base HEAD main 2>/​dev/​null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/​dev/​null

Or ask: "This branch split from main - is that correct?"

Step 3: Present Options

Present exactly these 4 options:

Implementation complete. What would you like to do?

1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
4. Discard this work

Which option?

Don't add explanation - keep options concise.

Step 4: Execute Choice

Option 1: Merge Locally
# Switch to base branch
git checkout <base-branch>

# Pull latest
git pull

# Merge feature branch
git merge <feature-branch>

# Verify tests on merged result
<test command>

# If tests pass
git branch -d <feature-branch>

Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)

Option 2: Push and Create PR
# Push branch
git push -u origin <feature-branch>

# Create PR
gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
<2-3 bullets of what changed>

## Test Plan
- [ ] <verification steps>
EOF
)"

Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)

Option 3: Keep As-Is

Report: "Keeping branch <name>. Worktree preserved at <path>."

Don't cleanup worktree.

Option 4: Discard

Confirm first:

This will permanently delete:
- Branch <name>
- All commits: <commit-list>
- Worktree at <path>

Type 'discard' to confirm.

Wait for exact confirmation.

If confirmed:

git checkout <base-branch>
git branch -D <feature-branch>

Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)

Step 5: Cleanup Worktree

For Options 1, 2, 4:

Check if in worktree:

git worktree list | grep $(git branch --show-current)

If yes:

git worktree remove <worktree-path>

For Option 3: Keep worktree.

Quick Reference

OptionMergePushKeep WorktreeCleanup Branch
1. Merge locally✓--✓
2. Create PR-✓✓-
3. Keep as-is--✓-
4. Discard---✓ (force)

Common Mistakes

Skipping test verification

  • Problem: Merge broken code, create failing PR
  • Fix: Always verify tests before offering options

Open-ended questions

  • Problem: "What should I do next?" → ambiguous
  • Fix: Present exactly 4 structured options

Automatic worktree cleanup

  • Problem: Remove worktree when might need it (Option 2, 3)
  • Fix: Only cleanup for Options 1 and 4

No confirmation for discard

  • Problem: Accidentally delete work
  • Fix: Require typed "discard" confirmation

Red Flags

Never:

  • Proceed with failing tests
  • Merge without verifying tests on result
  • Delete work without confirmation
  • Force-push without explicit request

Always:

  • Verify tests before offering options
  • Present exactly 4 options
  • Get typed confirmation for Option 4
  • Clean up worktree for Options 1 & 4 only

Integration

Called by:

  • subagent-driven-development (Step 7) - After all tasks complete
  • executing-plans (Step 5) - After all batches complete

Pairs with:

  • using-git-worktrees - Cleans up worktree created by that skill

When to Use

This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.

Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

More Git & Pull Requests skills

requesting-code-review logo
Git & Pull Requests

requesting-code-review

Dispatch code review subagents with focused context to catch issues before they compound.

295.4K 245.8K
View
receiving-code-review logo
Git & Pull Requests

receiving-code-review

Evaluate code review feedback with technical rigor before implementing, avoiding performative agreement and blind implementation.

295.4K 208.8K
View
using-git-worktrees logo
Git & Pull Requests

using-git-worktrees

Isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification.

295.4K 205.2K
View

Structured workflow for completing development branches with test verification and merge/PR options.

295.4K 202.3K
View
review logo
Git & Pull Requests

review

review

276.6K 94.8K
View
code-review-and-quality logo
Git & Pull Requests

code-review-and-quality

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.

101.4K 55.6K
View
git-commit logo
Git & Pull Requests

git-commit

Standardized git commits using Conventional Commits specification with intelligent diff analysis and message generation.

39.7K 46.4K
View
git-workflow-and-versioning logo
Git & Pull Requests

git-workflow-and-versioning

Structures git workflow practices. Use when making any code change. Use when committing, branching, resolving conflicts, or when you need to organize work across multiple parallel streams.

101.4K 44.2K
View
ponytail-review logo
Git & Pull Requests

ponytail-review

Code review focused exclusively on over-engineering. Finds what to delete: reinvented standard library, unneeded dependencies, speculative abstractions, dead flexibility. One line per finding: location, what to cut, what replaces it. Complements correctness-focused review, this one only hunts complexity.

155.5K 32.1K
View
excalidraw-diagram-generator logo
Git & Pull Requests

excalidraw-diagram-generator

Generate Excalidraw diagrams from natural language descriptions in multiple formats.

39.7K 31.1K
View
ponytail-audit logo
Git & Pull Requests

ponytail-audit

Whole-repo audit for over-engineering. Like ponytail-review, but scans the entire codebase instead of a diff: a ranked list of what to delete, simplify, or replace with stdlib/native equivalents. One-shot report, does not apply fixes.

155.5K 30K
View
code-review-excellence logo
Git & Pull Requests

code-review-excellence

Systematic code review practices for constructive feedback, bug detection, and team knowledge sharing.

40.2K 29.4K
View

Coding & apps AI tools

Opus Clip logo
Coding & apps

Opus Clip

Opus.ai: Revolutionize Your Web Experience

Free
View
Imagica logo
Coding & apps

Imagica

Build a no-code AI app in minutes.

Freemium
View
E
Coding & apps

Emergent.sh

An IDE for code migration from legacy to modern frameworks through coding agents.

Freemium
View
Wonder Dynamics logo
Coding & apps

Wonder Dynamics

Automate CGI animation in live-action scenes

Paid
View
M
Coding & apps

Mixo

Launch a website in seconds with AI.

Paid
View
AI Code Convert logo
Coding & apps

AI Code Convert

Streamline Your Coding Experience with AI Code Helper

Free
View