requesting-code-review
Dispatch code review subagents with focused context to catch issues before they compound.
finishing-a-development-branch
Structured workflow for completing development branches with test verification and merge/PR options.
Full skill instructions
Guide completion of development work by presenting clear options and handling chosen workflow.
Core principle: Verify tests → Detect environment → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.
Announce at start: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
Before presenting options, verify tests pass:
# Run project's test suite
npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...
If tests fail:
Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing:
[Show failures]
Cannot proceed with merge/PR until tests pass.
Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2.
If tests pass: Continue to Step 2.
Determine workspace state before presenting options:
GIT_DIR=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
GIT_COMMON=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
This determines which menu to show and how cleanup works:
| State | Menu | Cleanup |
|---|---|---|
GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON (normal repo) | Standard 4 options | No worktree to clean up |
GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON, named branch | Standard 4 options | Provenance-based (see Step 6) |
GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON, detached HEAD | Reduced 3 options (no merge) | No cleanup (externally managed) |
# Try common base branches
git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/null
Or ask: "This branch split from main - is that correct?"
Normal repo and named-branch worktree — present exactly these 4 options:
Implementation complete. What would you like to do?
1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
4. Discard this work
Which option?
Detached HEAD — present exactly these 3 options:
Implementation complete. You're on a detached HEAD (externally managed workspace).
1. Push as new branch and create a Pull Request
2. Keep as-is (I'll handle it later)
3. Discard this work
Which option?
Don't add explanation - keep options concise.
# Get main repo root for CWD safety
MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel)
cd "$MAIN_ROOT"
# Merge first — verify success before removing anything
git checkout <base-branch>
git pull
git merge <feature-branch>
# Verify tests on merged result
<test command>
# Only after merge succeeds: cleanup worktree (Step 6), then delete branch
Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 6), then delete branch:
git branch -d <feature-branch>
# Push branch
git push -u origin <feature-branch>
Do NOT clean up worktree — user needs it alive to iterate on PR feedback.
Report: "Keeping branch <name>. Worktree preserved at <path>."
Don't cleanup worktree.
Confirm first:
This will permanently delete:
- Branch <name>
- All commits: <commit-list>
- Worktree at <path>
Type 'discard' to confirm.
Wait for exact confirmation.
If confirmed:
MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel)
cd "$MAIN_ROOT"
Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 6), then force-delete branch:
git branch -D <feature-branch>
Only runs for Options 1 and 4. Options 2 and 3 always preserve the worktree.
GIT_DIR=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
GIT_COMMON=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
WORKTREE_PATH=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
If GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON: Normal repo, no worktree to clean up. Done.
If worktree path is under .worktrees/ or worktrees/: Superpowers created this worktree — we own cleanup.
MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel)
cd "$MAIN_ROOT"
git worktree remove "$WORKTREE_PATH"
git worktree prune # Self-healing: clean up any stale registrations
Otherwise: The host environment (harness) owns this workspace. Do NOT remove it. If your platform provides a workspace-exit tool, use it. Otherwise, leave the workspace in place.
| Option | Merge | Push | Keep Worktree | Cleanup Branch |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Merge locally | yes | - | - | yes |
| 2. Create PR | - | yes | yes | - |
| 3. Keep as-is | - | - | yes | - |
| 4. Discard | - | - | - | yes (force) |
Skipping test verification
Open-ended questions
Cleaning up worktree for Option 2
Deleting branch before removing worktree
git branch -d fails because worktree still references the branchRunning git worktree remove from inside the worktree
cd to main repo root before git worktree removeCleaning up harness-owned worktrees
.worktrees/ or worktrees/No confirmation for discard
Never:
git worktree remove from inside the worktreeAlways:
cd to main repo root before worktree removalgit worktree prune after removalDispatch code review subagents with focused context to catch issues before they compound.
Evaluate code review feedback with technical rigor before implementing, avoiding performative agreement and blind implementation.
Isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification.
review
Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.
Standardized git commits using Conventional Commits specification with intelligent diff analysis and message generation.
Structures git workflow practices. Use when making any code change. Use when committing, branching, resolving conflicts, or when you need to organize work across multiple parallel streams.
Code review focused exclusively on over-engineering. Finds what to delete: reinvented standard library, unneeded dependencies, speculative abstractions, dead flexibility. One line per finding: location, what to cut, what replaces it. Complements correctness-focused review, this one only hunts complexity.
Generate Excalidraw diagrams from natural language descriptions in multiple formats.
Whole-repo audit for over-engineering. Like ponytail-review, but scans the entire codebase instead of a diff: a ranked list of what to delete, simplify, or replace with stdlib/native equivalents. One-shot report, does not apply fixes.
Systematic code review practices for constructive feedback, bug detection, and team knowledge sharing.
Identify and review overdue Google Tasks requiring immediate attention.
Opus.ai: Revolutionize Your Web Experience
Build a no-code AI app in minutes.
An IDE for code migration from legacy to modern frameworks through coding agents.
Automate CGI animation in live-action scenes
Branded artistic QR-code concepts
Launch a website in seconds with AI.
Streamline Your Coding Experience with AI Code Helper
Convert any screenshot or design to clean code.