Create Inspect Task

Create Inspect Task

You help users create custom inspect-ai evaluation tasks through an interactive, guided workflow. Create well-documented, reusable evaluation scripts that follow inspect-ai best practices.

Your Task

Guide the user through designing and implementing a custom inspect-ai evaluation task. Create a complete, runnable task file and comprehensive documentation that explains the design decisions and usage.

Operating Modes

This skill supports two modes:

Mode 1: Experiment-Guided (Recommended)

When an experiment_summary.yaml file exists (created by design-experiment skill), extract configuration to pre-populate:

• Dataset path and format
• Model information
• Evaluation objectives
• System prompts
• Common parameters

Usage: Run skill from experiment directory or provide path to experiment_summary.yaml

Mode 2: Standalone

Create evaluation tasks from scratch without experiment context. User provides all configuration manually.

Usage: Run skill when no experiment exists or when creating general-purpose evaluation tasks

Workflow

Initial Setup (Both Modes)

1. Check for experiment context
   • Look for experiment_summary.yaml in current directory
   • If found, ask user: "I found an experiment summary. Would you like me to use it to configure the evaluation task?"
   • If user says yes, proceed with Mode 1
   • If no or not found, proceed with Mode 2

Mode 1: Experiment-Guided Workflow

1. Read experiment_summary.yaml - Extract configuration
2. Confirm extracted info - Show user what was found (dataset, models, etc.)
3. Understand evaluation objective - What specific aspect to evaluate?
4. Configure task-specific details - Solver chain, scorers (guided by experiment context)
5. Add task parameters - Make the task flexible and reusable
6. Generate code - Create the complete task file with experiment integration
7. Create documentation - Write design documentation with experiment context
8. Create log - Document all decisions in logs/​create-inspect-task.log
9. Provide usage guidance - Show user how to run the task with their models

Mode 2: Standalone Workflow

1. Understand the objective - What does the user want to evaluate?
2. Configure dataset - Guide dataset format selection and loading
3. Design solver chain - Build the solver pipeline (prompts, generation, etc.)
4. Select scorers - Choose appropriate scoring mechanisms
5. Add task parameters - Make the task flexible and reusable
6. Generate code - Create the complete task file
7. Create documentation - Write design documentation with rationale
8. Create log - Document all decisions in logs/​create-inspect-task.log
9. Provide usage guidance - Show user how to run the task

Extracting Information from experiment_summary.yaml (Mode 1)

When operating in experiment-guided mode, extract the following information from the YAML structure:

YAML Structure Overview

experiment:
  name: string
  project: string
  question: string

data:
  training:
    path: string
    label: string
    format: string
    splits:
      train: int
      validation: int
      test: int

models:
  base:
    - name: string
      path: string

evaluation:
  system_prompt: string
  temperature: float

runs:
  - name: string
    type: string  # "fine-tuned" or "control"
    model: string

Extraction Algorithm

import yaml
from pathlib import Path

def extract_from_experiment_summary(path):
    """Extract configuration from experiment_summary.yaml"""
    with open(path, 'r') as f:
        config = yaml.safe_load(f)

    # Extract dataset configuration
    dataset_path = config['data']['training']['path']
    dataset_format = config['data']['training']['format']
    dataset_splits = config['data']['training']['splits']

    # Extract system prompt from evaluation section
    system_prompt = config['evaluation']['system_prompt']

    # Extract research question
    research_question = config['experiment']['question']
    project = config['experiment']['project']

    # Extract model information (first base model)
    base_models = config['models']['base']
    model_name = base_models[0]['name'] if base_models else None
    model_path = base_models[0]['path'] if base_models else None

    # Extract run names for documentation examples
    run_names = [run['name'] for run in config['runs']]
    control_runs = [run['name'] for run in config['runs'] if run['type'] == 'control']

    return {
        'dataset_path': dataset_path,
        'dataset_format': dataset_format,
        'dataset_splits': dataset_splits,
        'system_prompt': system_prompt,
        'research_question': research_question,
        'project': project,
        'model_name': model_name,
        'model_path': model_path,
        'run_names': run_names,
        'control_runs': control_runs
    }

Key Fields to Extract

From experiment section:

• question → Research question/​objective (informs evaluation goal)
• project → Blueprint directory name under blueprints/ (pins the task family)

From data.training section:

• path → Dataset path for evaluation
• format → Dataset format (json)
• splits → Sample counts (use test split for evaluation)

From models.base[] section:

• name → Model identifier
• path → Full path to base model (for usage examples)

From evaluation section:

• system_prompt → Use same prompt for consistency
• temperature → Default temperature setting

From runs[] section:

• name → Run identifiers (for documentation)
• type → Filter for "control" runs that need evaluation

Presenting Extracted Information

After extraction, show the user what was found:

## Configuration Extracted from Experiment

I found the following configuration in your experiment:

**Dataset:**
- Path: `{ck_data_dir}/​capitalization/​words_4L_80P_300.json`
- Format: JSON
- Splits: train (240), test (60)

**Models:**
- Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct
- Path: `/​scratch/​gpfs/​.../​pretrained-llms/​Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct`

**System Prompt:**

{extracted_prompt or "(none)"}

**Research Question:**
{extracted_question}

I'll use this information to help configure your evaluation task. You can override any of these settings if needed.

Validation

Check extracted information:

• ✓ Dataset path exists (verify with ls)
• ✓ Dataset format is supported (.json, .jsonl)
• ✓ Model path exists (verify with ls)
• ✓ System prompt is properly formatted (string, not list)

If validation fails:

• Warn user but continue
• Ask user to provide correct information
• Log validation failures

Logging

IMPORTANT: Create a detailed log file at {task_directory}/​logs/​create-inspect-task.log that records all questions, answers, and decisions made during task creation.

Log Format

[YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS] ACTION: Description
Details: {specifics}
Result: {outcome}

What to Log

• User's evaluation objective
• Dataset selection and configuration decisions
• Solver chain composition choices
• Scorer selection rationale
• Task parameter decisions
• File creation
• Any validation performed

Example Log Entries

Mode 1: Experiment-Guided

[2025-10-24 14:30:00] MODE_SELECTION: Experiment-guided mode
Details: Found experiment_summary.yaml at /​scratch/​gpfs/​MSALGANIK/​mjs3/​cap_4L_lora_lr_sweep/​experiment_summary.yaml
Result: User confirmed to use experiment configuration

[2025-10-24 14:30:05] EXTRACT_CONFIG: Reading experiment_summary.yaml
Details: Parsing YAML structure: experiment, data, models, evaluation sections
Result: Successfully extracted configuration

[2025-10-24 14:30:10] EXTRACTED_DATASET: Dataset configuration
Details: Path: {ck_data_dir}/​capitalization/​words_4L_80P_300.json
Format: JSON, Splits: train (240), test (60)
Result: Verified dataset exists (43KB)

[2025-10-24 14:30:15] EXTRACTED_SYSTEM_PROMPT: System prompt from experiment
Details: Prompt: "" (empty - no system message)
Result: Will use empty system prompt for consistency with training

[2025-10-24 14:30:20] EXTRACTED_RESEARCH_QUESTION: Scientific objective
Details: Compare LoRA ranks and learning rates for capitalization task
Result: Will design evaluation to measure exact match accuracy

[2025-10-24 14:30:25] EVALUATION_OBJECTIVE: User wants to evaluate capitalization accuracy
Details: Exact match (case-sensitive), using experiment dataset
Result: Will use match(location="exact", ignore_case=False) scorer for strict evaluation

[2025-10-24 14:30:30] SOLVER_CONFIG: Designing solver chain
Details: system_message(""), prompt_template("{prompt}"), generate(temp=0.0)
Result: Matches training configuration for consistency

Mode 2: Standalone

[2025-10-24 14:30:00] MODE_SELECTION: Standalone mode
Details: No experiment_summary.yaml found
Result: User will provide all configuration manually

[2025-10-24 14:30:05] EVALUATION_OBJECTIVE: User wants to evaluate sentiment classification
Details: Binary classification (positive/​negative), using custom dataset in JSON format
Result: Will use match() scorer for exact matching, temperature=0.0 for consistency

[2025-10-24 14:30:15] DATASET_CONFIG: Selected JSON dataset format
Details: Dataset path: /​scratch/​gpfs/​MSALGANIK/​niznik/​data/​sentiment_test.json
Field mapping: input="text", target="sentiment"
Result: Will use hf_dataset with json format and custom record_to_sample function

Questions to Ask

1. Evaluation Objective

What do you want to evaluate?

• Classification task? (sentiment, topic, entity type, etc.)
• Generation quality? (summarization, translation, etc.)
• Factual accuracy? (question answering, fact checking)
• Reasoning ability? (math, logic, chain-of-thought)
• Task-specific capability? (code generation, instruction following)

What defines a correct answer?

• Exact match with target?
• Contains specific information?
• Model-graded quality assessment?
• Multiple acceptable answers?

2. Dataset Configuration

What dataset format do you have?

• JSON file (.json or .jsonl)
• HuggingFace dataset (specify dataset name)
• CSV file
• Custom format (will need conversion)

Where is the dataset located?

• Get full path to dataset
• Verify file exists if possible
• Check file size for sanity

What are the field names?

• Input field name (e.g., "question", "text", "prompt")
• Target/​answer field name (e.g., "answer", "label", "output")
• Any metadata fields to preserve? (e.g., "category", "difficulty")

Dataset structure specifics:

• For JSON: Is it a single JSON file with nested structure or JSONL?
• For JSON with splits: Which field contains the test split?
• For HuggingFace: Dataset name and split to use?

Example questions:

• "Does your JSON file have a structure like {'train': [...], 'test': [...]}?"
• "Is each line a separate JSON object (JSONL format)?"
• "Do you need to load from a specific split like 'test' or 'validation'?"

3. Solver Configuration

System message:

• Do you want to provide instructions to the model via system message?
• What role should the model play? (e.g., "You are a helpful assistant", "You are an expert classifier")
• Default: empty string (no system message)

Prompt template:

• Should we use the input directly or wrap it in a template?
• Do you need chain-of-thought prompting?
• Default: "{prompt}" (direct input)

Generation parameters:

• Temperature:
  • 0.0 for deterministic, consistent answers (recommended for most evals)
  • Higher values (0.7-1.0) for creative tasks
• Max tokens: Maximum length of model response (default: model's default)
• Top-p: Nucleus sampling parameter (default: 1.0)

Common solver patterns:

• Simple generation: [system_message(""), prompt_template("{prompt}"), generate()]
• Chain-of-thought: [chain_of_thought(), generate()]
• Multiple-choice: [multiple_choice()] (don't add separate generate())
• Custom template: [prompt_template("Answer: {prompt}\n"), generate()]

4. Scorer Selection

Based on evaluation objective, suggest scorers:

For exact matching:

• match() - Target appears at beginning/​end; ignores case, whitespace, punctuation
  • Options: location="begin"/"end"/"any", ignore_case=True/​False
• exact() - Precise matching after normalization
• includes() - Target appears anywhere in output
  • Options: ignore_case=True/​False

For multiple choice:

• choice() - Works with multiple_choice() solver
• Returns letter of selected answer (A, B, C, D, etc.)

For pattern extraction:

• pattern() - Extract answer using regex
  • Requires regex pattern parameter

For model-graded evaluation:

• model_graded_qa() - Another model assesses answer quality
  • Options: partial_credit=True/​False, custom template
• model_graded_fact() - Checks if specific facts appear
• Note: Requires additional model, adds latency and cost

For numeric/​F1 scoring:

• f1() - F1 score for text overlap

Multiple scorers:

• Can use a list: [match(), includes()] to get multiple scores
• Helpful for comparing scoring methods

5. Task Parameters

Should the task accept parameters for flexibility?

Common parameters to expose:

• system_prompt - Allow different system messages
• temperature - Enable temperature tuning
• dataset_path - Support different datasets
• grader_model - For model-graded scoring
• config_dir - (legacy) For runtime config reading; scaffold-inspect uses direct params instead

Benefits of parameters:

• Run variations without code changes
• Easier experimentation
• Better reusability

How to pass parameters:

inspect eval task.py -T param_name=value

6. Model Specification

How will the model be specified?

Option 1: CLI specification (most flexible)

• User provides model at runtime
• inspect eval task.py --model hf/​local -M model_path=/​path/​to/​model
• Recommended for most cases

Option 2: Integration with fine-tuning config (legacy)

• Like existing inspect_task example
• Reads from setup_finetune.yaml at runtime via config_dir parameter
• Note: scaffold-inspect now bakes values into SLURM instead of using this pattern

Option 3: Hard-coded in task

• Less flexible but simpler
• Can specify model inside task definition
• Better for benchmarking specific models

Output Files

Create two files:

1. Task Script: {task_name}_task.py

The complete, runnable inspect-ai task following best practices.

File naming convention:

• Descriptive name: sentiment_classification_task.py
• Include domain: math_reasoning_task.py
• Follow pattern: {domain}_{type}_task.py

Required components:

from inspect_ai import Task, task
from inspect_ai.dataset import json_dataset, hf_dataset, FieldSpec
from inspect_ai.solver import chain, generate, prompt_template, system_message
from inspect_ai.scorer import match, includes

@task
def my_task(param1: str = "default"):
    """
    Brief description of what this task evaluates.

    Args:
        param1: Description of parameter

    Returns:
        Task: Configured inspect-ai task
    """

    # Dataset loading
    dataset = ...

    # Solver chain
    solver = chain(
        system_message("..."),
        prompt_template("{prompt}"),
        generate({"temperature": 0.0})
    )

    # Return task
    return Task(
        dataset=dataset,
        solver=solver,
        scorer=...
    )

Best practices to follow:

• Use type hints for parameters
• Include docstring explaining purpose
• Add comments explaining non-obvious choices
• Handle errors gracefully (try/​except for file operations)
• Validate required parameters
• Use descriptive variable names

2. Design Documentation: {task_name}_design.md

Comprehensive documentation of design decisions.

Required sections:

# {Task Name} Evaluation Task

**Created:** {timestamp}
**Inspect-AI Version:** {version if known}

## Evaluation Objective

{What this task evaluates and why}

## Dataset Configuration

**Format:** {JSON/​HuggingFace/​etc.}
**Location:** `{full_path_to_dataset}`
**Size:** {number of samples if known}

**Field Mapping:**
- Input field: `{field_name}`
- Target field: `{field_name}`
- Metadata fields: `{field_names or "none"}`

**Loading Method:**
{Description of how dataset is loaded}

**Data Structure:**
{Explanation of JSON structure, splits, etc.}

## Solver Chain

**Components:**
1. {Solver 1}: {Purpose}
2. {Solver 2}: {Purpose}
3. ...

**System Message:**

{system message text or "none"}

**Prompt Template:**

{template or "direct input"}

**Generation Parameters:**
- Temperature: {value} - {rationale}
- Max tokens: {value or "default"} - {rationale}
- {Other parameters if any}

**Rationale:**
{Why this solver chain was chosen}

## Scorer Configuration

**Primary Scorer:** `{scorer_name}()`

**Options:**
- {option1}: {value} - {reason}
- {option2}: {value} - {reason}

**Additional Scorers:**
{List if multiple scorers used, or "none"}

**Rationale:**
{Why this scorer is appropriate for the task}

## Task Parameters

| Parameter | Type | Default | Purpose |
|-----------|------|---------|---------|
| {param1} | {type} | {default} | {description} |

**Parameter Usage:**
```bash
inspect eval {task_file}.py -T {param}={value}

Model Specification

Recommended usage:

inspect eval {task_file}.py --model hf/​local -M model_path=/​path/​to/​model

{Any specific notes about model compatibility}

Example Usage

Basic evaluation:

inspect eval {task_name}_task.py --model hf/​local -M model_path=/​path/​to/​model

With parameters:

inspect eval {task_name}_task.py --model hf/​local -M model_path=/​path/​to/​model -T temperature=0.5

Evaluating fine-tuned model: {if applicable}

cd /​path/​to/​experiment/​run/​epoch_0
inspect eval {task_name}_task.py --model hf/​local -M model_path=$PWD -T config_dir=$PWD

Output Files

Inspect-ai will create:

• logs/​{task_name}_{timestamp}.eval - Evaluation results log
• Console output with accuracy and metrics

Expected Performance

{If known, describe expected baseline performance or what good performance looks like}

Notes

{Any additional considerations, limitations, or future improvements}

References

• Inspect-AI documentation: https://inspect.aisi.org.uk/
• {Any other relevant references}

## Code Generation Guidelines

### Dataset Loading Patterns

**JSON with nested splits:**
```python
from inspect_ai.dataset import hf_dataset

def record_to_sample(record):
    return Sample(
        input=record["input"],
        target=record["output"]
    )

dataset = hf_dataset(
    path="json",
    data_files="/​path/​to/​data.json",
    field="test",  # Access the "test" split
    split="train",  # Don't get confused - this refers to top-level split
    sample_fields=record_to_sample
)

JSONL (one JSON object per line):

from inspect_ai.dataset import json_dataset

def record_to_sample(record):
    return Sample(
        input=record["question"],
        target=record["answer"]
    )

dataset = json_dataset(
    "/​path/​to/​data.jsonl",
    record_to_sample
)

HuggingFace dataset:

from inspect_ai.dataset import hf_dataset, FieldSpec

dataset = hf_dataset(
    path="username/​dataset-name",
    split="test",
    sample_fields=FieldSpec(
        input="question",
        target="answer",
        metadata=["category", "difficulty"]  # Preserve metadata
    )
)

Solver Chain Patterns

Simple generation:

from inspect_ai.solver import chain, generate, prompt_template, system_message

solver = chain(
    system_message(""),  # Empty if no system message needed
    prompt_template("{prompt}"),  # Direct input
    generate({"temperature": 0.0})
)

With system message and custom template:

solver = chain(
    system_message("You are an expert classifier. Respond with only the category label."),
    prompt_template("Text: {prompt}\n\nCategory:"),
    generate({"temperature": 0.0, "max_tokens": 50})
)

Chain-of-thought:

from inspect_ai.solver import chain_of_thought, generate

solver = chain(
    chain_of_thought(),  # Adds "Let's think step by step" prompt
    generate({"temperature": 0.0})
)

Multiple choice:

from inspect_ai.solver import multiple_choice

solver = multiple_choice()  # Don't add generate() separately
# Or with chain-of-thought:
solver = multiple_choice(cot=True)

Scorer Patterns

Exact matching (case-insensitive):

from inspect_ai.scorer import match

scorer = match()  # Default: ignore case, whitespace, punctuation
# Or customize:
scorer = match(location="exact", ignore_case=False)

Substring matching:

from inspect_ai.scorer import includes

scorer = includes()  # Default: case-sensitive
# Or:
scorer = includes(ignore_case=True)

Multiple scorers:

scorer = [
    match("exact", ignore_case=False),
    includes(ignore_case=False)
]
# Results will show scores from both

Model-graded:

from inspect_ai.scorer import model_graded_qa

scorer = model_graded_qa(
    partial_credit=True,  # Allow 0.5 scores
    model="openai/​gpt-4o"  # Specify grading model
)

Integration with Fine-Tuning Workflow

Experiment-Guided Task Creation (Recommended)

When creating tasks for an experiment:

1. Run from experiment directory:

   cd /​scratch/​gpfs/​MSALGANIK/​mjs3/​my_experiment/
   # Invoke create-inspect-task skill
   

2. Skill automatically extracts from experiment_summary.yaml:

   • Dataset path and format
   • System prompt (ensures eval matches training)
   • Model information
   • Research objectives

3. Task parameter modes:

   • Direct parameters (preferred): data_path, prompt, system_prompt passed via -T flags. scaffold-inspect bakes these into SLURM scripts at scaffolding time.
   • config_dir mode (legacy): Reads from setup_finetune.yaml at runtime. Not used by scaffold-inspect but supported for backwards compatibility.

Generated Task Pattern

For tasks integrated with experiments:

import yaml
from pathlib import Path

@task
def my_task(
    config_dir: Optional[str] = None,
    dataset_path: Optional[str] = None,
    system_prompt: str = "",
    temperature: float = 0.0,
    split: str = "test"
) -> Task:
    """
    Evaluate model using configuration from fine-tuning setup or direct paths.

    Args:
        config_dir: Path to epoch directory (contains ../​setup_finetune.yaml).
                   If provided, reads dataset path and system prompt from config.
        dataset_path: Direct path to dataset JSON file. Used if config_dir not provided.
        system_prompt: System message for the model. Overrides config if both provided.
        temperature: Generation temperature (default: 0.0 for deterministic output).
        split: Which data split to use (default: "test").

    Returns:
        Task: Configured inspect-ai task
    """

    # Determine configuration source
    if config_dir:
        # Mode 1: Read from fine-tuning configuration
        config_path = Path(config_dir).parent / "setup_finetune.yaml"

        with open(config_path, 'r') as f:
            config = yaml.safe_load(f)

        # Extract settings from fine-tuning config
        dataset_path = config['input_dir_base'] + config['dataset_label'] + config['dataset_ext']

        # Use system prompt from config unless overridden
        if not system_prompt:
            system_prompt = config.get('system_prompt', '')

    elif dataset_path:
        # Mode 2: Direct dataset path
        # system_prompt and other params used as provided
        pass
    else:
        raise ValueError("Must provide either config_dir or dataset_path")

    # Load dataset
    dataset = ...  # Load using dataset_path

    return Task(
        dataset=dataset,
        solver=chain(
            system_message(system_prompt),
            prompt_template("{prompt}"),
            generate({"temperature": temperature})
        ),
        scorer=...
    )

Usage Examples

Evaluating fine-tuned model from experiment:

cd /​path/​to/​experiment/​run_dir/​epoch_0
inspect eval /​path/​to/​my_task.py --model hf/​local -M model_path=$PWD -T config_dir=$PWD

Evaluating base model (control run):

inspect eval my_task.py \
  --model hf/​local \
  -M model_path=/​scratch/​gpfs/​MSALGANIK/​pretrained-llms/​Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct \
  -T dataset_path=/​path/​to/​dataset.json

Integration with setup_inspect.py

This task pattern integrates with setup_inspect.py, which renders eval SLURM scripts from a template. The scaffold-inspect agent writes eval_config.yaml (referencing the task script created here) and calls:

python src/​tools/​inspect/​setup_inspect.py \
  --config eval_config.yaml \
  --model_name Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct

Validation Before Completion

Common Validation (Both Modes)

Before finishing, verify:

• ✓ Task file is syntactically correct Python
• ✓ All imports are present
• ✓ Task decorated with @task
• ✓ Dataset loading code matches format
• ✓ Solver chain follows inspect-ai patterns
• ✓ Scorer is appropriate for task
• ✓ Design documentation includes all sections
• ✓ Example usage commands are correct
• ✓ Log file documents all decisions

Mode 1 Specific Validation

Additional checks for experiment-guided mode:

• ✓ experiment_summary.yaml was successfully parsed
• ✓ Extracted dataset path exists and format matches
• ✓ System prompt matches training configuration
• ✓ Task supports both config_dir and dataset_path parameters
• ✓ Documentation includes experiment context (research question, runs)
• ✓ Usage examples show both fine-tuned and base model evaluation
• ✓ Log includes extraction details and validation results

Next Steps After Creation

After creating the task, guide user:

1. Test the task:

   # Validate syntax
   python -m py_compile {task_file}.py
   
   # Test with small sample
   inspect eval {task_file}.py --model {model} --limit 5
   

2. Run full evaluation:

   inspect eval {task_file}.py --model {model}
   

3. View results:

   inspect view
   # Opens web UI to browse evaluation logs
   

4. Iterate if needed:

   • Adjust scorer settings
   • Modify prompts
   • Change generation parameters
   • Use inspect score to re-score without re-running

Important Notes

General Best Practices

• Follow inspect-ai best practices from https://inspect.aisi.org.uk/
• Always include docstrings and comments
• Make tasks parameterized for flexibility
• Create comprehensive documentation for reproducibility
• Use type hints for parameters
• Handle errors gracefully
• Validate dataset paths when possible
• Keep generation temperature at 0.0 for consistency unless user needs creativity
• Prefer simple scorers (match, includes) over model-graded when possible
• Test with small samples first (--limit 5)

Experiment Integration

• Prefer Mode 1 (experiment-guided) when working with designed experiments
• Always check for experiment_summary.yaml before starting
• Extract and validate all configuration before proceeding
• System prompt consistency is critical - eval must match training
• Generated tasks should work for both fine-tuned and base models
• Include experiment context in documentation (research question, runs)
• Use config_dir parameter pattern for experiment integration
• Log all extraction and validation steps for reproducibility

Error Handling

If dataset file not found:

• Warn user but proceed with code generation
• Note in documentation that path should be verified
• Include validation suggestion in next steps

If unsure about dataset format:

• Ask for example record
• Offer to help convert to supported format
• Suggest user examine file structure

If scorer choice unclear:

• Recommend starting with simple scorers
• Suggest using multiple scorers for comparison
• Note that scorers can be changed later without re-running generation