data-architecture
Use when designing data platforms, choosing between data lakes/lakehouses/warehouses, or implementing data mesh patterns. Covers modern data architecture approaches.
SKILL.md
Full skill instructions
Data Architecture
Modern data architecture patterns including data lakes, lakehouses, data mesh, and data platform design.
When to Use This Skill
- Choosing between data lake, warehouse, and lakehouse
- Designing a modern data platform
- Implementing data mesh principles
- Planning data storage strategy
- Understanding data architecture trade-offs
Data Architecture Evolution
Generation 1: Data Warehouse (1990s-2000s)
- Structured data only
- ETL into warehouse
- Star/snowflake schemas
- SQL-based analytics
Generation 2: Data Lake (2010s)
- All data types (structured, semi, unstructured)
- Schema-on-read
- Hadoop/HDFS based
- Cheap storage, complex processing
Generation 3: Lakehouse (2020s)
- Best of both: lake flexibility + warehouse features
- ACID transactions on lake
- Schema enforcement optional
- Unified analytics and ML
Architecture Comparison
Data Warehouse
┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐
│ Sources │ ──► │ ETL │ ──► │ Warehouse │
│ (Structured)│ │ (Transform) │ │ (Star/Snow) │
└─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────┐
│ BI │
│ Analytics │
└─────────────┘
Characteristics:
- Schema-on-write
- Optimized for SQL queries
- Structured data only
- High data quality
- Expensive storage
Best for:
- Business intelligence
- Financial reporting
- Structured analytics
Data Lake
┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐
│ Sources │ ──► │ Data Lake │
│ (All) │ │ (Raw) │
└─────────────┘ └─────────────┘
│
┌────────────────┼────────────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐
│ ML │ │ ETL │ │ Spark │
│ Training│ │ to DW │ │ Analysis│
└─────────┘ └─────────┘ └─────────┘
Characteristics:
- Schema-on-read
- All data types
- Cheap storage
- Flexible processing
- Risk of "data swamp"
Best for:
- Data science/ML
- Unstructured data
- Experimental analysis
Data Lakehouse
┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────────────────┐
│ Sources │ ──► │ Data Lakehouse │
│ (All) │ │ ┌──────────────────────────┐ │
└─────────────┘ │ │ Metadata Layer │ │
│ │ (Delta/Iceberg/Hudi) │ │
│ └──────────────────────────┘ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Storage Layer │ │
│ │ (Object Storage) │ │
│ └──────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────┘
│
┌────────────────────┼────────────────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐
│ SQL │ │ ML │ │ Stream │
│ BI │ │ Workload│ │ Process │
└─────────┘ └─────────┘ └─────────┘
Characteristics:
- ACID transactions
- Schema evolution
- Time travel
- Unified batch/streaming
- Open formats
Best for:
- Unified analytics
- Both BI and ML
- Modern data platforms
Architecture Selection Guide
| Factor | Warehouse | Lake | Lakehouse |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data types | Structured | All | All |
| Query performance | Excellent | Poor-Medium | Good |
| Data quality | High | Variable | Configurable |
| Cost | High | Low | Medium |
| ML workloads | Limited | Excellent | Excellent |
| Real-time | Limited | Good | Good |
| Governance | Strong | Weak | Strong |
| Complexity | Low | High | Medium |
Decision Tree:
Is data mostly structured with BI focus?
├── Yes → Data Warehouse
└── No
└── Need ML + BI on same data?
├── Yes → Lakehouse
└── No
└── Primarily ML/unstructured?
├── Yes → Data Lake
└── No → Lakehouse
Lakehouse Technologies
Delta Lake (Databricks)
Features:
- ACID transactions
- Time travel (data versioning)
- Schema enforcement/evolution
- Unified batch/streaming
- Optimized performance (Z-ordering, compaction)
File format: Parquet + Delta log
Apache Iceberg (Netflix)
Features:
- ACID transactions
- Hidden partitioning
- Schema evolution
- Time travel
- Vendor neutral
File format: Parquet/ORC/Avro + metadata
Apache Hudi (Uber)
Features:
- ACID transactions
- Incremental processing
- Record-level updates
- Time travel
- Optimized for streaming
File format: Parquet + Hudi metadata
Technology Comparison
| Feature | Delta Lake | Iceberg | Hudi |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACID | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Time Travel | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Schema Evolution | Good | Excellent | Good |
| Streaming | Excellent | Good | Excellent |
| Ecosystem | Databricks | Wide | Wide |
| Performance | Excellent | Excellent | Good |
| Community | Large | Growing | Medium |
Data Mesh
Principles
Data Mesh = Decentralized data architecture
Four Principles:
1. Domain Ownership
- Data owned by domain teams
- Not centralized data team
2. Data as a Product
- Treat data like a product
- Quality, discoverability, usability
3. Self-Serve Platform
- Platform enables domain teams
- Reduces friction
4. Federated Governance
- Global standards
- Local implementation
Data Products
Data Product = Autonomous unit of data
Components:
┌──────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Data Product │
│ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐ │
│ │ Data │ │ Metadata │ │
│ │ (Tables) │ │ (Schema, docs) │ │
│ └──────────┘ └──────────────────┘ │
│ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐ │
│ │ Code │ │ APIs │ │
│ │ (ETL) │ │ (Access layer) │ │
│ └──────────┘ └──────────────────┘ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────┐│
│ │ Quality + SLAs ││
│ └──────────────────────────────────┘│
└──────────────────────────────────────┘
Data Mesh vs Centralized
| Aspect | Centralized | Data Mesh |
|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Central data team | Domain teams |
| Scaling | Team bottleneck | Scales with org |
| Domain knowledge | Lost in translation | Preserved |
| Governance | Centralized | Federated |
| Implementation | Uniform | Heterogeneous |
| Complexity | Lower initially | Higher initially |
Data Modeling Patterns
Star Schema
┌─────────────┐
│ Dim_Time │
└──────┬──────┘
│
┌───────────┐ │ ┌───────────┐
│Dim_Product├──┼──┤Dim_Customer│
└───────────┘ │ └───────────┘
│
┌──────┴──────┐
│ Fact_Sales │
└─────────────┘
Pros: Simple, fast queries
Cons: Denormalized, redundancy
Best for: BI, reporting
Snowflake Schema
Normalized dimensions:
Dim_Product → Dim_Category → Dim_Subcategory
Pros: Less redundancy
Cons: More joins, slower
Best for: Complex hierarchies
Data Vault
Hub (business keys) ←→ Link (relationships) ←→ Satellite (attributes)
Pros: Auditable, flexible, scalable
Cons: Complex, learning curve
Best for: Enterprise data warehouse
Storage Layers
Bronze/Silver/Gold (Medallion Architecture)
┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐
│ Bronze │ ──► │ Silver │ ──► │ Gold │
│ (Raw) │ │(Cleaned)│ │(Curated)│
└─────────┘ └─────────┘ └─────────┘
Bronze: Raw ingestion, append-only
Silver: Cleaned, validated, conformed
Gold: Business-level aggregates, features
Zones in Data Lake
Landing Zone: Raw files from sources
Raw Zone: Structured raw data
Curated Zone: Transformed, quality-checked
Consumption Zone: Ready for analytics
Sandbox Zone: Exploration and experimentation
Best Practices
Data Quality
Implement quality gates:
- Schema validation
- Null checks
- Range validation
- Referential integrity
- Freshness monitoring
Governance
Key capabilities:
- Data catalog
- Lineage tracking
- Access control
- Privacy compliance
- Audit logging
Performance
Optimization techniques:
- Partitioning (by date, region)
- Clustering/Z-ordering
- Compaction
- Caching
- Materialized views
Related Skills
etl-elt-patterns- Data transformationstream-processing- Real-time datadatabase-scaling- Database patterns
