Skip to content

Codex Oracle

Consults an external AI oracle (OpenAI Codex) for advanced code review and architectural planning.

58installs58stars

SKILL.md

Full skill instructions

name description

codex-oracle

This skill should be used when the user asks to "use Codex", "ask Codex", "consult Codex", "Codex review", "use GPT for planning", "ask GPT to review", "get GPT's opinion", "what does GPT think", "second opinion on code", "consult the oracle", "ask the oracle", or mentions using an AI oracle for planning or code review. NOT for implementation tasks.

Codex Oracle

Use OpenAI Codex CLI as a planning oracle and code reviewer . Codex provides analysis and recommendations; Claude synthesizes and presents to the user.

Critical : This skill is for planning and review ONLY. Never use Codex to implement changes.

Prerequisites

Before invoking Codex, validate availability:

~ /​.claude/​skills/​codex-oracle/​scripts/​check-codex.sh

If the script exits non-zero, display the error message and stop. Do not proceed without Codex CLI.

Configuration Defaults

Setting Default User Override

Model gpt-5.2 "use model X" or "with gpt-5.2"

Reasoning Dynamic (based on complexity) "use medium reasoning" or "with xhigh effort"

Sandbox read-only Not overridable (safety constraint)

Timeout 5 minutes minimum Estimate based on task complexity

Profile quiet (notify=[]) User opts into another profile or notifications

Timeout Guidelines

When invoking codex exec via the Bash tool, always set an appropriate timeout:

Minimum : 5 minutes (300000ms) for any Codex operation

Simple queries (single file review, focused question): 5 minutes (300000ms)

Moderate complexity (multi-file review, feature planning): 10 minutes (600000ms)

High complexity (architecture analysis, large codebase planning): 15 minutes (900000ms)

Reasoning Effort Guidelines

Select reasoning effort based on task complexity:

Complexity Effort Examples

Simple low Single file review, syntax check, quick question

Moderate medium Multi-file review, focused feature planning, bug analysis

Complex high Architecture analysis, cross-cutting concerns, security audit

Maximum xhigh Large codebase planning, comprehensive design, deep reasoning

Selection heuristics:

low : Task involves <3 files, simple question, or quick validation

medium : Task involves 3-10 files or requires moderate analysis

high : Task spans multiple modules or requires architectural thinking

xhigh : Task requires comprehensive codebase understanding or critical decisions

For available models and reasoning levels, consult references/​codex-flags.md .

Workflow

  1. Validate Prerequisites

Run the check script. On failure, report the installation instructions and abort.

  1. Determine Mode

Planning mode : User wants architecture, implementation approach, or design decisions

Review mode : User wants code analysis, bug detection, or improvement suggestions

  1. Construct Prompt

Build a focused prompt for Codex based on mode:

Planning prompt template:

Analyze this codebase and provide a detailed implementation plan for: [user request]

Focus on:

  • Architecture decisions and trade-offs
  • Files to create or modify
  • Implementation sequence
  • Potential risks or blockers

Do NOT implement anything. Provide analysis and recommendations only.

Review prompt template:

Review the following code for:

  • Bugs and logic errors
  • Security vulnerabilities
  • Performance issues
  • Code quality and maintainability
  • Adherence to best practices

[code or file paths]

Provide specific, actionable feedback with file locations and line references.

  1. Assess Complexity and Execute Codex

Before executing, assess task complexity to select appropriate reasoning effort:

Count files involved in the query

Evaluate scope (single module vs cross-cutting)

Consider depth (surface review vs architectural analysis)

Use HEREDOC syntax for safe prompt handling. Always use the Bash tool's timeout parameter (minimum 300000ms / 5 minutes).

Redirect output to a temp file to avoid context bloat:

Select EFFORT based on complexity assessment (low/​medium/​high/​xhigh)

Bash tool timeout: 300000-900000ms based on complexity

codex exec
-m " ${MODEL :- gpt-5.2} "
-c " model_reasoning_effort= ${EFFORT} "
--profile " ${CODEX_PROFILE :- quiet} "
-s read-only
--skip-git-repo-check
2> /​dev/​null << ' EOF ' > /​tmp/​codex-analysis.txt [constructed prompt] EOF

Important flags:

-m : Model selection

-c model_reasoning_effort= : Reasoning depth (low/​medium/​high/​xhigh) — select based on Reasoning Effort Guidelines

--profile quiet : Default for this skill (suppresses notify hooks); change only if the user explicitly wants another profile/​notifications

-s read-only : Prevents any file modifications (non-negotiable)

--skip-git-repo-check : Works outside git repositories

2>/​dev/​null : Suppresses thinking tokens from output

Bash tool timeout : Estimate based on task complexity (see Timeout Guidelines above). Never use the default 2-minute timeout for Codex operations.

  1. Present Codex Output

Read the analysis from the temp file and display to the user with clear attribution:

cat /​tmp/​codex-analysis.txt

Format the output with clear attribution:

Codex Analysis

[Codex output from /​tmp/​codex-analysis.txt]


Model: gpt-5.2 | Reasoning: [selected effort level]

For very large outputs (>5000 lines), summarize key sections rather than displaying everything.

  1. Synthesize and Plan

After presenting Codex output:

Synthesize key insights from Codex analysis

Identify actionable items and critical decisions

If Codex's analysis presents multiple viable approaches or significant trade-offs , consider using AskUserQuestion to clarify user preferences before finalizing the plan

Write a structured plan to ~/​.claude/​plans/[plan-name].md

Call ExitPlanMode to present the plan for user approval

When to use AskUserQuestion:

Codex proposes multiple architectures with different trade-offs

Technology or library choices need user input

Scope decisions (minimal vs comprehensive) are ambiguous

Skip clarification when:

Codex's recommendations are clear and unambiguous

User's original request already specified preferences

Only one viable approach exists

Error Handling

Error Response

Codex not installed Show installation instructions from check script

Codex timeout Inform user, suggest simpler query or lower reasoning

API rate limit Wait and retry, or inform user of limit

Empty response Retry once, then report failure

Usage Examples

Planning Request

User: "Ask Codex to plan how to add authentication to this app"

Validate Codex CLI available

Gather relevant codebase context

Assess complexity → auth spans multiple modules → high reasoning

Construct planning prompt with auth requirements

Execute Codex with gpt-5.2 and high

Present Codex's architecture recommendations

Synthesize into Claude plan format

Write to ~/​.claude/​plans/ and call ExitPlanMode

Code Review Request

User: "Have Codex review the changes in src/​auth/"

Validate Codex CLI available

Read files in src/​auth/ directory

Assess complexity → single directory, focused review → medium reasoning

Construct review prompt with file contents

Execute Codex review with medium

Present findings with file/​line references

Summarize critical issues and recommendations

Additional Resources

Reference Files

references/​codex-flags.md - Complete model and flag documentation

Scripts

scripts/​check-codex.sh - Prerequisite validation (run before any Codex command)