Training Reviewer
Overview
The Training Reviewer skill provides comprehensive review and validation of training materials against evidence-based instructional frameworks. It helps identify gaps, ensure compliance with brain-friendly principles, validate time allocations, and surface opportunities for improvement before materials are delivered.
When to Use This Skill
Use Training Reviewer when:
- Reviewing completed session designs or workshop agendas
- Validating facilitator guides against framework requirements
- Assessing learning journey designs for 70:20:10 balance
- Checking materials for brain-friendly principle compliance
- Identifying gaps in practice activities or support materials
- Preparing materials for pilot delivery
- Iterating after pilot feedback
Core Review Frameworks
TBR 4Cs Compliance Review
Every training session should allocate time appropriately across the 4Cs:
- Connection: 10-15% - Activates knowledge, builds safety
- Concepts: 30-40% - Chunked (max 15 min), with processing
- Concrete Practice: 40-50% - Guided → Collaborative → Independent
- Conclusion: 5-10% - Learner summary, commitments, celebration
Brain-Friendly Principles Review
- 10-1 Rule: No content delivery exceeds 15 minutes without processing
- Active Learning: Learners talk, teach, and do (not just listen)
- Real Work: Practice mirrors actual job tasks, not simulations
- Chunking: Content broken into manageable pieces (7-15 minutes max)
- Multimodal: Mix visual, auditory, kinesthetic, reading/writing
Review Workflows
Quick Review (30 minutes)
For rapid validation before pilot:
- Check time allocations: Do 4Cs percentages match?
- Check practice: Is 40-50% of time hands-on?
- Check processing: Do concept chunks have processing activities?
- Check realness: Are practice scenarios real work?
- Check conclusion: Is it learner-generated (not facilitator summary)?
Comprehensive Review (60-90 minutes)
For thorough validation of materials:
- Review overall structure and learning objectives
- Validate each framework component (use checklists in references/)
- Identify all critical issues
- Identify important improvements
- Draft detailed review report
Post-Pilot Review
After initial delivery:
- Review pilot feedback on timing and flow
- Update materials based on learner feedback
- Check if changes maintain framework compliance
- Document lessons learned
Key Review Checklists
Session Design Quick Check
Learning Journey Quick Check
Common Issues to Flag
Critical (Stop and Fix)
- Insufficient practice (< 40% of session)
- Lecture > 15 minutes without processing
- Missing Connection or Conclusion
- Simulated practice instead of real work
- No post-workshop support planned
Important (Should Fix Before Pilot)
- Time allocations don't match 4Cs percentages
- Missing real work examples
- Unclear practice progression
- Processing activities don't follow chunks
- Incomplete facilitator notes
Nice-to-Have (Iterate Later)
- More multimodal elements
- Deeper discussion questions
- Energy management tips
- Extension activities for advanced learners
Resources
This skill includes comprehensive checklists and templates:
references/
4cs-compliance-checklist.md - Detailed TBR framework validation
brain-friendly-checklist.md - Brain science principles verification
70-20-10-checklist.md - Learning journey balance review
review-report-template.md - Standard review report format
common-issues-and-fixes.md - Quick reference for typical problems
scripts/
framework_validator.py - Script to analyze session timing allocations
checklist_scorer.py - Auto-scores materials against compliance criteria
Integration with Other Skills
- training-designer: Validate designs created with this skill
- training-content-creator: Review generated content
- learning-journey-builder: Validate 70:20:10 balance
- workshop-facilitator-prep: Review facilitator guides for completeness
Review Best Practices
✅ Do:
- Review with frameworks as reference
- Identify specific, actionable issues
- Balance critical feedback with strengths
- Provide concrete recommendations
- Check for learner-centered design
❌ Don't:
- Use vague feedback
- Fix materials without discussion
- Ignore framework requirements
- Skip the strengths section
- Review in isolation