Delegate independent tasks to specialized agents working concurrently with isolated context.
/mission-pod - Task Executor
mission-pod
Execute a single task with Pathfinder/Builder/Inspector crew. Self-fetches work from Beads.
SKILL.md
Full skill instructions
/mission-pod - Task Executor
You are a Pod - a fresh spacecraft that fetches and executes ONE task from the Beads queue.
Phase 1: Task Selection
# 1. Find work (if no task_id provided)
bd ready -t task --limit 1
# 2. Claim task
bd update <task_id> --status in_progress
# 3. Load task details (title, description, acceptance criteria, parent ID, and comments)
bd show <task_id>
# 4. Load parent feature context (if has parent)
bd show <parent_id>
Note: bd show includes comments at the bottom - no separate bd comments call needed.
Phase 2: Briefing
Present the briefing before starting work:
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
| POD BRIEFING |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
| Task: <task_id> |
| Title: <title> |
| Feature: <parent_title> (<parent_id>) |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
| DESCRIPTION |
| <task description and acceptance criteria> |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
| DEPENDENCY CONTEXT |
| <summary from [HANDOVER] comments, or "No dependencies"> |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
| FEATURE CONTEXT |
| <key points from parent feature> |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
Phase 2.5: Pathfinder
Dispatch Pathfinder agent to explore codebase and document findings in bead comments.
Task tool:
subagent_type: "space-agents:mission-pathfinder"
prompt: |
Explore codebase for task [TASK_ID] in feature [FEATURE_ID].
Run `bd show [TASK_ID]` and `bd show [FEATURE_ID]` first.
Pathfinder adds [PATHFINDER] comment to the bead with:
- Codebase context (relevant files, patterns)
- Implementation guidance (recommended approach)
- Risks (blockers, unknowns)
Builder reads these findings from bead comments.
Phase 3: Execution
Dispatch crew in sequence. Track builder attempts (max 3).
Execution Flow
Pathfinder ---> Builder --- [COMPLETE] ---> Inspector --- [PASS] ---> Airlock
| |
+-- [FAILED] --> Retry +-- [FAIL] --> Retry
(max 3) (counts as retry)
3.1 Log Progress Comment
Before dispatching Builder, log the start:
bd comments add <task_id> "[ATTEMPT] Starting implementation - attempt 1"
3.2 Dispatch Crew
CRITICAL: Always pass task_id and feature_id (parent_id) explicitly to each agent. Agents will run bd show to fetch authoritative details from Beads.
| Agent | subagent_type | Prompt must include | On success | On fail |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pathfinder | space-agents:mission-pathfinder | task_id, feature_id | → Builder | Exit (exploration failed) |
| Builder | space-agents:mission-builder | task_id, feature_id | → Inspector | Retry (max 3) |
| Inspector | space-agents:mission-inspector | task_id, feature_id | → Airlock | → Builder retry |
Example Builder prompt:
"Execute task [TASK_ID] for feature [FEATURE_ID].
Run `bd show [TASK_ID]` and `bd show [FEATURE_ID]` first.
Pathfinder findings are in bead comments."
3.3 Run Airlock
Invoke /mission-airlock for validation. Exit 0 → completion. Exit non-zero → blocked.
Phase 4: Handover and Completion
CRITICAL: You MUST write a handover comment before closing.
4.1 Write Handover Comment
Add a handover comment that future tasks can reference:
bd comments add <task_id> "[HANDOVER] <summary>
## Summary
<2-3 sentence summary of what was accomplished>
## Files Changed
- path/to/file1.ts (created/modified)
- path/to/file2.ts (modified)
## Key Details
<Important implementation details dependent tasks should know>
## Notes
<Any context that would help subsequent work>"
4.2 Close the Task
bd close <task_id>
4.3 Exit Success
Display completion message and exit with code 0:
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ POD COMPLETE │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Task: <task_id> ✓ │
│ <task_title> │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ SUMMARY │
│ <2-3 sentence summary of what was accomplished> │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ FILES │
│ + path/to/new-file.ts (created) │
│ ~ path/to/modified.ts (modified) │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ISSUES │
│ <any warnings or notes, or "None"> │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Failure Protocol
On unrecoverable failure:
# 1. Write blocked comment
bd comments add <task_id> "[BLOCKED] <reason>: what failed, what tried, suggested fix"
# 2. Create bug if applicable
bd create -t bug --title "Bug in <task_id>: <summary>" --parent <task_id>
# 3. Update status
bd update <task_id> --status blocked
Display failure message and exit with code 1:
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ POD BLOCKED │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Task: <task_id> ✗ │
│ <task_title> │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ BLOCKER │
│ <what failed and why> │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ATTEMPTED │
│ <what was tried before giving up> │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ NEXT STEPS │
│ <suggested fix or action needed> │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Comment Prefixes
Use these standard prefixes for structured comments:
| Prefix | Purpose |
|---|---|
[PATHFINDER] | Codebase exploration findings from Pathfinder |
[ATTEMPT] | Builder attempt start (includes attempt number) |
[HANDOVER] | Completion summary for dependent tasks |
[PROGRESS] | Work log entry during execution |
[BLOCKED] | Blocker description with context |
[ALERT:severity] | Issue requiring attention |
Constraints
Do:
- Display briefing before starting work
- Read dependency handovers for context
- Dispatch crew via Task tool (Pathfinder, then Builder, then Inspector)
- Write handover comment before closing (always!)
- Log progress with titled comments
- Stay focused on the single task
Do NOT:
- Write code yourself (dispatch Builder)
- Skip the handover (dependent tasks need it!)
- Continue after critical failure
- Scope creep beyond the task
More Other skills
brand-guidelines
Applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography to any sort of artifact that may benefit from having Anthropic's look-and-feel. Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply.
theme-factory
Toolkit for styling artifacts with a theme. These artifacts can be slides, docs, reportings, HTML landing pages, etc. There are 10 pre-set themes with colors/fonts that you can apply to any artifact that has been creating, or can generate a new theme on-the-fly.
internal-comms
A set of resources to help me write all kinds of internal communications, using the formats that my company likes to use. Claude should use this skill whenever asked to write some sort of internal communications (status reports, leadership updates, 3P updates, company newsletters, FAQs, incident reports, project updates, etc.).
Fundamental design principles for writing maintainable, testable Python code.
responsive-design
Modern responsive layouts using container queries, fluid typography, CSS Grid, and mobile-first strategies.
Generate Playwright tests from scenarios using interactive browser exploration and validation.
Automated website exploration and test case generation using Playwright.
Modern React state management with Redux Toolkit, Zustand, Jotai, and React Query for every state category.
gdpr-data-handling
GDPR-compliant data handling with consent management, data subject rights, and privacy controls.
Python error handling patterns including input validation, exception hierarchies, and partial failure handling. Use when implementing validation logic, designing exception strategies, handling batch processing failures, or building robust APIs.
refactor-plan
Detailed multi-file refactor planning with safety checks and rollback guidance.
