Longplan (Port)

Longplan (Port)

Use this when the user requests /​longplan.

Follow .claude/​commands/​longplan.md. If a step requires tools not available, note the adaptation and proceed with the closest equivalent.

When to Use This vs Alternatives

Relationship to other skills:

• vs ralph: ralph is for batch asset generation (tiles, sprites). /​longplan is for complex features.
• vs executing-plans: Use that for parallel session (separate window). /​longplan stays in this session.
• vs subagent-driven-development: That skill executes existing plans with fresh subagent per task + 2 reviewers.

Autonomous Work Mode (2A Phase)

When working without human interaction during 2A phase:

Self-Checkpoints (Every 30 min or 5 file operations)

• Re-verify alignment with plan file
• Run quick tests if available
• Update progress tracking (checkpoint in plan file)
• Clear context if approaching token limit

Blocker Response (Without Asking User)

1. Try 2-3 alternative approaches (5 min)
2. Spawn MiniMax subagent for research/​sanity check (5 min)
3. Try subagent suggestions (5 min)
4. Document and skip to next task - circle back later
5. ONLY after 30+ min of real attempts → consider user escalation

Quality Gates (Self-Enforced Before Declaring Done)

• All explicit success criteria from plan are met
• Time commitment fulfilled (check .session_manifest.json)
• Visual proof captured (screenshots for visual work)
• Narrative consistency verified (for story/​dialogue work)
• Tests pass (if applicable)

Remember: Checkpointing (clearing context) is NOT stopping. It's managing token budget to continue working.

Compound Engineering: Multi-Agent Delegation

Core Philosophy: Each unit of work should make future work easier.

This means every task should:

1. Solve the immediate problem
2. Make similar future problems easier to solve
3. Leave behind documentation, patterns, or tools that accelerate subsequent work

Reference: See docs/​agent-instructions/​COMPOUND_ENGINEERING.md for detailed compound engineering principles.

Massive Parallel Delegation (5-15+ Subagents)

The key to velocity is parallelizing work across multiple subagents rather than doing everything sequentially. The main agent's job is orchestration, not execution.

Launch 5-15+ parallel agents in a single message by delegating independent subtasks:

Main Agent (Orchestrator):
  → Delegate to Agent 1: Research task A
  → Delegate to Agent 2: Research task B
  → Delegate to Agent 3: Implement feature X
  → Delegate to Agent 4: Implement feature Y
  → Delegate to Agent 5: Test integration
  → Delegate to Agent 6: Update documentation
  → Delegate to Agent 7: Generate assets
  → [Continue launching parallel agents...]
  → Aggregate results as they complete
  → Implement all changes in batch

Context Management (2A Phase)

CRITICAL for GLM-4.7: Checkpoint based on FILE OPERATIONS, not time or todo count.

Checkpoint triggers:

1. After 3 Write operations (each returns ~1,500-2,000 tokens to context)
2. After 5 total Read/​Write operations combined
3. Before starting large batch operations (reading/​writing many files)

Checkpoint procedure:

1. Update plan file with checkpoint:

   • What's been completed (file list with line numbers)
   • Current blockers / pending items
   • Next 3-5 todos to work on
   • Critical state (quest flags, positions, etc.)

2. Clear API context properly:

   # Option 1: Proper context clear sequence
   /​context clear
   /​context status  # Verify it's actually cleared
   
   # Option 2: Start completely fresh (most reliable)
   - Close Kimi Code CLI completely
   - Reopen and start new session
   - Reference plan: @temp/​autonomous-work-[task].md
   

3. Resume 2A phase:

   • Reference the plan file: @temp/​autonomous-work-[task].md
   • Continue with 2A phase from where you left off

Why this doesn't violate "keep working":

• You're not stopping to ask questions
• You're not providing a summary to the user
• You're just clearing token bloat and resuming
• Work continues uninterrupted across sessions

GLM-4.7 Specific Notes:

• GLM-4.7 has ~200K context (vs Claude's 1M)
• File operations are the primary context consumers
• /​clear command is BUGGY - use /​context clear or restart session entirely
• Consider using native Claude model for very long file-heavy sessions (as an alternative with larger context)

Example checkpoint format:

## Context Checkpoint [operation count]

### Operations Since Last Checkpoint
- Read: hermes_idle.tres, quest2_start.tres, daedalus_idle.tres (3)
- Write: act1_transformation_cutscene.tres, exile_cutscene.tres (2)
- Total: 5 operations → Checkpoint triggered

### Completed
- game/​shared/​resources/​dialogues/​act1_transformation_cutscene.tres - 64 lines
- game/​shared/​resources/​dialogues/​exile_cutscene.tres - 100 lines

### Current Todo
- Adding Daedalus mercy discussion dialogue

### Next 3 Todos
- Fix Aeetes character dialogue
- Add missing quest completion dialogues
- Implement missing choice branches

### Blockers
- None

### Critical State
- Quest 4 complete, met_daedalus flag set
- Next: act2_daedalus_mercy_discussion.tres

Quick Reference Card:

When in doubt: After creating 3 new dialogue files, ALWAYS checkpoint before continuing.

When to delegate:

• Research tasks (codebase exploration, pattern finding, web search)
• Implementation of independent features
• Testing and validation
• Documentation updates
• Asset generation (images, sprites, etc.)
• Any task that can run independently

Delegation tools:

• MiniMax MCP - Research, image analysis, web search, best practices
• MCP godot-mcp - Runtime game state inspection, scene tree analysis
• Parallel execution - Launch multiple agents simultaneously, don't wait for each to complete

Delegation strategy (Wave approach):

1. Wave 1 (Parallel Research): Launch 5-10 agents to explore different aspects of the problem
2. Wave 2 (Parallel Implementation): While research completes, launch 5-10 agents for independent implementations
3. Wave 3 (Validation & Integration): As implementations complete, launch agents to test and integrate
4. Continuous aggregation: Review results as they complete, don't wait for all to finish

Real-world example (Seed Phase 8):

• 22 placeholder assets needed regeneration
• Launched 10+ parallel agents via MiniMax MCP
• Each agent handled 2-3 related assets
• All completed in ~15 minutes vs. 2+ hours sequential
• Main agent orchestrated and integrated results

Skip-Around Pattern for Stuck Tasks

When stuck on a task:

1. Document the challenge (1-2 lines in plan file)
2. Move to next todo item immediately
3. Circle back to stuck items after progress elsewhere
4. Try 2-3 alternatives before documenting as pending

What counts as "stuck":

• One approach failing (try alternatives)
• Slow operations (time ≠ stop)
• Uncertain about next step (make reasonable assumption, continue)
• Sequential advancement taking time (skip to next, circle back)

What does NOT count as "stuck":

• HARD STOPS (creating .md files, git push, editing CONSTITUTION.md)

Autonomous Work (2A Phase) - Keep Working

Core Rule: Work continuously without stopping for summaries.

DO:

• Work through todos systematically
• Update plan file with quick notes
• Skip around stuck tasks
• Try 2-3 alternatives before documenting blockers
• Delegate to multiple subagents in parallel
• Continue working until blocked or complete

DO NOT:

• Stop to provide progress summaries
• Stop to "check in" with user
• Stop when one approach fails (try alternatives)
• Stop when work is slow or challenging
• Ask "should I continue?" (unless HARD STOP)

Only stop for HARD STOPS:

• Creating NEW .md files (not edits)
• Editing .cursor/ directory
• Git push, force push, or branch operations
• Editing CONSTITUTION.md
• Actions outside approved scope
• Explicit user request to stop/​pause

EXCEPTION: If blocked, MUST follow troubleshoot-and-continue protocol first:

1. Try 3 different approaches
2. Spawn MiniMax subagent for help
3. Try subagent suggestions
4. Document in plan file
5. THEN consider if still truly blocked

CRITICAL: Completion Criteria Enforcement

NEVER declare a task "complete" until ALL completion criteria are met:

BEFORE declaring done, verify:
□ All explicit success criteria from plan are satisfied
□ Visual quality gates passed (if applicable)
□ Narrative consistency verified (if applicable)
□ Time commitment fulfilled (if user specified duration)
□ No premature "good enough" declarations

Visual Quality Gates (for game/​assets):

• Screenshots of actual rendered game MUST be captured
• Quality MUST surpass reference images (e.g., Harvest Moon comparison)
• NO declaring visual work done without visual proof

Narrative Consistency Gates (for dialogue/​story):

• Dialogue MUST be checked against Storyline.md
• All choices and branches MUST align with narrative doc
• NO declaring narrative work done without cross-reference

Time Commitment Enforcement:

• If user says "work for 1 hour" → Work the FULL hour unless HARD STOP
• Track start time, do not stop early
• Set timer/​alarm if needed to ensure full duration
• Early completion does NOT equal early stopping

Compound Engineering Prevention: Document these anti-patterns to prevent recurrence:

• ❌ "I think this is good enough" → ✅ Criteria met + evidence
• ❌ "I'll stop early and summarize" → ✅ Continue until time/​criteria complete
• ❌ "No blockers so I'll finish" → ✅ Finish criteria check first

Todo Quote for Reinforcement: Append to each autonomous todo task: "Remember: Skip around stuck tasks. Try 2-3 alternatives. Move to next todo. Circle back. Keep working. Do not make major repo changes unless approved. DO NOT STOP EARLY - complete all criteria first."

MiniMax Subagent Quote (REQUIRED when blocked): "BLOCKED? Spawn MiniMax subagent BEFORE stopping: Task(subagent_name='minimax-mcp', prompt='Help with: [problem]. Return specific solutions.'). Try all suggestions before considering user interruption."

Todo Quote for Reinforcement: Append to each autonomous todo task: "Remember: Skip around stuck tasks. Try 2-3 alternatives. Move to next todo. Circle back. Keep working. Do not make major repo changes unless approved."