xiaohongshu
xiaohongshu
build-iphone-apps
Build professional native iPhone apps in Swift with SwiftUI and UIKit. Full lifecycle - build, debug, test, optimize, ship. CLI-only, no Xcode. Targets iOS 26 with iOS 18 compatibility.
Full skill instructions
<essential_principles>
The user is the product owner. Claude is the developer.
The user does not write code. The user does not read code. The user describes what they want and judges whether the result is acceptable. Claude implements, verifies, and reports outcomes.
Never say "this should work." Prove it:
xcodebuild -destination 'platform=iOS Simulator,name=iPhone 16' build 2>&1 | xcsift
xcodebuild test -destination 'platform=iOS Simulator,name=iPhone 16'
xcrun simctl boot "iPhone 16" && xcrun simctl launch booted com.app.bundle
If you didn't run it, you don't know it works.
| Question | How to Answer |
|---|---|
| Does the logic work? | Write test, see it pass |
| Does it look right? | Launch in simulator, user looks at it |
| Does it feel right? | User uses it |
| Does it crash? | Test + launch |
| Is it fast enough? | Profiler |
Tests verify correctness. The user verifies desirability.
Bad: "I refactored DataService to use async/await with weak self capture"
Good: "Fixed the memory leak. leaks now shows 0 leaks. App tested stable for 5 minutes."
The user doesn't care what you changed. The user cares what's different.
Change → Verify → Report → Next change
Never batch up work. Never say "I made several changes." Each change is verified before the next. If something breaks, you know exactly what caused it.
Unclear requirement? Ask now. Multiple valid approaches? Ask which. Scope creep? Ask if wanted. Big refactor needed? Ask permission.
Wrong: Build for 30 minutes, then "is this what you wanted?" Right: "Before I start, does X mean Y or Z?"
Every stopping point = working state. Tests pass, app launches, changes committed. The user can walk away anytime and come back to something that works.
When adding debug logging (print statements, NSLog, etc.):
Mark clearly: Comment with // DEBUG: prefix
// DEBUG: Testing YIN accuracy corrections
print("YIN Detected: \(frequency) Hz")
Gather data: Use logging to understand the problem
Remove before final commit: Unless user explicitly wants it kept
Ask before committing: "Should I remove the debug logging now?"
Exception: Logging that provides user value (error messages, diagnostics) should stay but use proper frameworks. </essential_principles>
<intake> **Ask the user:**What would you like to do?
Then read the matching workflow from workflows/ and follow it.
</intake>
<verification_loop>
# 1. Does it build?
xcodebuild -scheme AppName -destination 'platform=iOS Simulator,name=iPhone 16' build 2>&1 | xcsift
# 2. Do tests pass?
xcodebuild -scheme AppName -destination 'platform=iOS Simulator,name=iPhone 16' test
# 3. Does it launch? (if UI changed)
xcrun simctl boot "iPhone 16" 2>/dev/null || true
xcrun simctl install booted ./build/Build/Products/Debug-iphonesimulator/AppName.app
xcrun simctl launch booted com.company.AppName
Report to the user:
<when_to_test>
Write a test when:
Skip tests when:
The principle: Tests let the user verify correctness without reading code. If the user needs to verify it works, and it's not purely visual, write a test. </when_to_test>
<reference_index>
All in references/:
Architecture: app-architecture, swiftui-patterns, navigation-patterns Data: data-persistence, networking Platform Features: push-notifications, storekit, background-tasks Quality: polish-and-ux, accessibility, performance Assets & Security: app-icons, security, app-store Development: project-scaffolding, cli-workflow, cli-observability, testing, ci-cd </reference_index>
<workflows_index>
All in workflows/:
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
| build-new-app.md | Create new iOS app from scratch |
| debug-app.md | Find and fix bugs |
| add-feature.md | Add to existing app |
| write-tests.md | Write and run tests |
| optimize-performance.md | Profile and speed up |
| ship-app.md | TestFlight, App Store submission |
| </workflows_index> |
xiaohongshu
technical spec
product ux expert
database patterns
Conduct multi-agent task orchestration and workflow coordination.
Initialize project with Conductor artifacts (product definition,
Expert in web animations, transitions, and motion design using Framer Motion and CSS
Creates Mermaid and ASCII diagrams for flowcharts, architecture, ERDs, state machines, mindmaps, and more. Use when user mentions diagram, flowchart, mermaid, ASCII diagram, text diagram, terminal diagram, visualize, C4, mindmap, architecture diagram, sequence diagram, ERD, or needs visual docume...
PostgreSQL bindings for H3 hexagonal grid system. Use when working with H3 cells in Postgres, including spatial indexing, geometry/geography integration, and raster analysis.
Context-Driven Development skill for projects using Conductor. Use this skill when you detect a `conductor/` directory in the project, when working on tasks defined in a `plan.md` file, or when the user asks about tracks, specs, or plans. Automatically applies TDD workflow, tracks task completion...
Display project status, active tracks, and next actions
Official Stakpak application containerization standard operating procedure, a step-by-step guidline to properly dockerize applications. This is a rule book curated by the Stakpak Team.
Generate, edit, and beat-sync AI video with leading models in one workspace.
The world's fastest calendar for remote work
Transform Your Design with AI Designer by ImgCreator.ai
Revolutionizing Video Production with AI-Powered Creativity
Extend an image past the frame and let AI fill the new aspect ratio.
Discover your celebrity doppelgänger with StarByFace!
ChainClarity explains 700+ crypto whitepapers in plain English, with layered summaries, comparisons, research tools, alerts, and a $4.99 Pro plan.
Opus.ai: Revolutionize Your Web Experience