Delegate independent tasks to specialized agents working concurrently with isolated context.
Imputation QC
bio-phasing-imputation-imputation-qc
Quality control of phasing and imputation results. Filter by INFO scores, assess accuracy, and prepare imputed data for downstream analysis. Use when filtering low-quality imputed variants or validating imputation accuracy before GWAS.
SKILL.md
Full skill instructions
Imputation QC
Extract INFO Scores
# Beagle DR2 (dosage R-squared)
bcftools query -f '%CHROM\t%POS\t%ID\t%REF\t%ALT\t%INFO/DR2\t%INFO/AF\n' \
imputed.vcf.gz > info_scores.txt
# Minimac R2
bcftools query -f '%CHROM\t%POS\t%ID\t%REF\t%ALT\t%INFO/R2\t%INFO/MAF\n' \
imputed.vcf.gz > info_scores.txt
# IMPUTE info
bcftools query -f '%CHROM\t%POS\t%ID\t%INFO\n' imputed.vcf.gz > info_scores.txt
Filter by INFO Score
# Standard threshold for GWAS
bcftools view -i 'INFO/DR2 > 0.3' imputed.vcf.gz -Oz -o imputed_r2_03.vcf.gz
# Strict threshold for fine-mapping
bcftools view -i 'INFO/DR2 > 0.8' imputed.vcf.gz -Oz -o imputed_r2_08.vcf.gz
# Combined filtering
bcftools view -i 'INFO/DR2 > 0.3 && INFO/AF > 0.01 && INFO/AF < 0.99' \
imputed.vcf.gz -Oz -o imputed_filtered.vcf.gz
INFO Score Distribution
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# Load INFO scores
info = pd.read_csv('info_scores.txt', sep='\t',
names=['CHR', 'POS', 'ID', 'REF', 'ALT', 'R2', 'AF'])
# Distribution plot
fig, axes = plt.subplots(1, 3, figsize=(15, 4))
# Overall distribution
axes[0].hist(info['R2'], bins=50, edgecolor='black')
axes[0].axvline(0.3, color='red', linestyle='--', label='Threshold 0.3')
axes[0].set_xlabel('INFO Score (R2)')
axes[0].set_ylabel('Count')
axes[0].set_title('INFO Score Distribution')
axes[0].legend()
# R2 by MAF
info['MAF'] = info['AF'].apply(lambda x: min(x, 1-x))
info['MAF_bin'] = pd.cut(info['MAF'], bins=[0, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5])
info.boxplot(column='R2', by='MAF_bin', ax=axes[1])
axes[1].set_xlabel('MAF Bin')
axes[1].set_ylabel('INFO Score')
axes[1].set_title('INFO by MAF')
# Scatter
axes[2].scatter(info['MAF'], info['R2'], alpha=0.1, s=1)
axes[2].set_xlabel('Minor Allele Frequency')
axes[2].set_ylabel('INFO Score')
axes[2].set_title('INFO vs MAF')
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig('imputation_qc.png', dpi=150)
Summarize Imputation Quality
# Count variants by quality
bcftools query -f '%INFO/DR2\n' imputed.vcf.gz | \
awk '{
if ($1 >= 0.8) high++;
else if ($1 >= 0.3) med++;
else low++
} END {
print "High quality (R2>=0.8):", high
print "Medium quality (0.3<=R2<0.8):", med
print "Low quality (R2<0.3):", low
}'
# Variants passing filter
echo "Total variants: $(bcftools view -H imputed.vcf.gz | wc -l)"
echo "Passing R2>0.3: $(bcftools view -i 'INFO/DR2>0.3' imputed.vcf.gz -H | wc -l)"
Check Concordance with Typed Variants
# Extract typed variants from imputed file
bcftools view -i 'INFO/TYPED=1' imputed.vcf.gz -Oz -o typed.vcf.gz
# Compare imputed vs original genotypes
bcftools gtcheck -g original.vcf.gz typed.vcf.gz > concordance.txt
# Parse concordance
grep "^CN" concordance.txt
Python: Comprehensive QC Report
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
def imputation_qc_report(info_file, output_prefix):
'''Generate comprehensive imputation QC report.'''
info = pd.read_csv(info_file, sep='\t',
names=['CHR', 'POS', 'ID', 'REF', 'ALT', 'R2', 'AF'])
# Calculate MAF
info['MAF'] = info['AF'].apply(lambda x: min(x, 1-x))
# Basic statistics
stats = {
'total_variants': len(info),
'mean_r2': info['R2'].mean(),
'median_r2': info['R2'].median(),
'variants_r2_03': (info['R2'] >= 0.3).sum(),
'variants_r2_08': (info['R2'] >= 0.8).sum(),
'pct_r2_03': 100 * (info['R2'] >= 0.3).mean(),
'pct_r2_08': 100 * (info['R2'] >= 0.8).mean(),
}
# By MAF bin
maf_bins = [(0, 0.001), (0.001, 0.01), (0.01, 0.05), (0.05, 0.5)]
for low, high in maf_bins:
mask = (info['MAF'] >= low) & (info['MAF'] < high)
stats[f'mean_r2_maf_{low}_{high}'] = info.loc[mask, 'R2'].mean()
stats[f'n_variants_maf_{low}_{high}'] = mask.sum()
# By chromosome
chr_stats = info.groupby('CHR').agg({
'R2': ['mean', 'count'],
'MAF': 'mean'
}).round(3)
# Write reports
with open(f'{output_prefix}_summary.txt', 'w') as f:
for k, v in stats.items():
f.write(f'{k}: {v}\n')
chr_stats.to_csv(f'{output_prefix}_by_chrom.txt', sep='\t')
return stats, chr_stats
stats, chr_stats = imputation_qc_report('info_scores.txt', 'imputation_qc')
Compare Multiple Imputation Runs
def compare_imputations(vcf1, vcf2, output):
'''Compare INFO scores between two imputation runs.'''
import subprocess
# Extract INFO from both
cmd1 = f"bcftools query -f '%CHROM:%POS\t%INFO/DR2\n' {vcf1}"
cmd2 = f"bcftools query -f '%CHROM:%POS\t%INFO/DR2\n' {vcf2}"
info1 = pd.read_csv(subprocess.Popen(cmd1, shell=True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE).stdout,
sep='\t', names=['ID', 'R2_1'])
info2 = pd.read_csv(subprocess.Popen(cmd2, shell=True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE).stdout,
sep='\t', names=['ID', 'R2_2'])
merged = info1.merge(info2, on='ID')
merged['R2_diff'] = merged['R2_1'] - merged['R2_2']
# Correlation
corr = merged['R2_1'].corr(merged['R2_2'])
print(f'Correlation between R2 scores: {corr:.4f}')
return merged
Hardy-Weinberg Filter
# Calculate HWE p-values (PLINK2)
plink2 --vcf imputed.vcf.gz \
--hardy \
--out hwe_check
# Filter extreme HWE deviations
plink2 --vcf imputed.vcf.gz \
--hwe 1e-6 \
--make-pgen \
--out imputed_hwe_filtered
Final QC Pipeline
#!/bin/bash
# Complete post-imputation QC
INPUT=$1
OUTPUT=$2
# 1. Filter by INFO score
bcftools view -i 'INFO/DR2 > 0.3' $INPUT -Oz -o ${OUTPUT}_r2.vcf.gz
# 2. Filter by MAF
bcftools view -i 'INFO/AF > 0.01 && INFO/AF < 0.99' \
${OUTPUT}_r2.vcf.gz -Oz -o ${OUTPUT}_maf.vcf.gz
# 3. Remove duplicates
bcftools norm -d all ${OUTPUT}_maf.vcf.gz -Oz -o ${OUTPUT}_nodup.vcf.gz
# 4. Index
bcftools index ${OUTPUT}_nodup.vcf.gz
# 5. Final stats
echo "Input variants: $(bcftools view -H $INPUT | wc -l)"
echo "After R2 filter: $(bcftools view -H ${OUTPUT}_r2.vcf.gz | wc -l)"
echo "After MAF filter: $(bcftools view -H ${OUTPUT}_maf.vcf.gz | wc -l)"
echo "Final variants: $(bcftools view -H ${OUTPUT}_nodup.vcf.gz | wc -l)"
Quality Thresholds by Application
| Application | R2 Threshold | MAF Threshold | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| GWAS discovery | 0.3 | 0.01 | Standard |
| GWAS replication | 0.5 | 0.01 | More stringent |
| Fine-mapping | 0.8 | 0.001 | High accuracy needed |
| Polygenic scores | 0.9 | 0.01 | Very high accuracy |
| Meta-analysis | 0.5 | Study-specific | Match across studies |
Related Skills
- phasing-imputation/genotype-imputation - Generate imputed data
- variant-calling/filtering-best-practices - VCF filtering operations
- population-genetics/association-testing - GWAS with imputed data
More Other skills
brand-guidelines
Applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography to any sort of artifact that may benefit from having Anthropic's look-and-feel. Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply.
theme-factory
Toolkit for styling artifacts with a theme. These artifacts can be slides, docs, reportings, HTML landing pages, etc. There are 10 pre-set themes with colors/fonts that you can apply to any artifact that has been creating, or can generate a new theme on-the-fly.
internal-comms
A set of resources to help me write all kinds of internal communications, using the formats that my company likes to use. Claude should use this skill whenever asked to write some sort of internal communications (status reports, leadership updates, 3P updates, company newsletters, FAQs, incident reports, project updates, etc.).
Fundamental design principles for writing maintainable, testable Python code.
responsive-design
Modern responsive layouts using container queries, fluid typography, CSS Grid, and mobile-first strategies.
Generate Playwright tests from scenarios using interactive browser exploration and validation.
Automated website exploration and test case generation using Playwright.
Modern React state management with Redux Toolkit, Zustand, Jotai, and React Query for every state category.
gdpr-data-handling
GDPR-compliant data handling with consent management, data subject rights, and privacy controls.
Python error handling patterns including input validation, exception hierarchies, and partial failure handling. Use when implementing validation logic, designing exception strategies, handling batch processing failures, or building robust APIs.
refactor-plan
Detailed multi-file refactor planning with safety checks and rollback guidance.
