stripe-projects
stripe projects
Analyze a company to identify their Ideal Customer Profiles (ICPs) - buyer personas, verticals, and tiers
Full skill instructions
Use this skill when: user asks to "analyze ICPs", "identify target customers", "who should [company] sell to", or any request to understand buyer profiles for a business.
Before analyzing, collect:
If the user doesn't provide website or description, use web search to find the company first.
Fetch the company website and extract:
Search for:
Look for signals:
The number of tiers should match the business reality. DO NOT default to 4 tiers—analyze the situation first.
| Business Type | Typical Tiers | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Niche B2B tool | 2-3 | Narrow focus, clear fit/no-fit |
| Horizontal SaaS | 3-4 | Multiple segments, similar needs |
| Enterprise platform | 4-5 | Complex buying, many personas |
| Marketplace/platform | 3-5 | Supply + demand sides |
| Consumer product | 2-3 | Demographics-based, simpler |
| Professional services | 2-4 | Relationship-driven |
Questions to determine tier count:
For EACH tier you create, define:
Tier [N]: [Descriptive Name] ([Priority Level])
2-Tier Example (Developer Tool):
3-Tier Example (Marketing SaaS):
5-Tier Example (Enterprise Platform):
| Priority | Score Range | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Highest | 4-5 | Immediate need, direct fit, accessible |
| High | 3-4 | Strong fit, some friction |
| Medium | 2-3 | Good fit, requires nurturing |
| Lower | 1-2 | Future potential, long-term |
| Experimental | 0-1 | Unproven, exploration only |
Note: Not all tiers need to exist for every business. Use only what makes sense.
Define who NOT to target:
| Category | Why Exclude |
|---|---|
| Wrong industry | No product fit |
| Wrong size | Below/above ideal customer size |
| Wrong geography | Can't serve their market |
| Wrong stage | Too early/late for their needs |
| Competitors | Conflict of interest |
| DIY solutions | Build vs buy preference |
List specific keywords/patterns that indicate non-fit:
| Score | Definition | Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Hot Lead | Direct fit + buying signals + contact available |
| 4 | High Priority | Strong fit + clear need + reachable |
| 3 | Standard | Good fit + some indicators |
| 2 | Low Priority | Uncertain fit OR missing info |
| 1 | Minimal | Weak connection, keep for reference |
| 0 | Exclude | No fit OR can't reach |
| Modifier | Score Impact |
|---|---|
| Recent funding | +1 |
| Hiring for relevant roles | +1 |
| Competitor customer (churn opportunity) | +1 |
| Direct contact available | +1 |
| No website or contact info | -1 |
| Generic email only (info@) | -0.5 |
For each tier, identify relevant titles to target:
Generate a markdown document like:
# ICP Methodology for [Company]
## Overview
[Brief description of the company and their product]
## Why [N] Tiers
[Explain the reasoning for the chosen number of tiers based on business model, sales motion, and market structure]
## Tier Definitions
### Tier 1: [Name] ([Priority Level])
**Score Range: [X-Y]**
[Description of who belongs here]
| Criteria | Examples |
|----------|----------|
| [Signal 1] | [Company types] |
| [Signal 2] | [Company types] |
**Why This Tier:** [Business rationale]
**Sales Motion:** [Self-serve / Sales-assisted / Enterprise]
**Decision Makers:** [Titles to target]
### Tier 2: [Name] ([Priority Level])
...
[Continue for each tier - may be 2, 3, 4, 5, or more]
## Exclusion Criteria
[Categories and keywords to skip]
## Scoring System
[Customized scoring with modifiers]
## Enrichment Priority
[Which tiers to enrich first and what to look for]
Output as structured data for CSV import:
tier,tier_name,description,criteria,examples,decision_makers,priority_score_range
1,Direct_Buyers,Companies with immediate need,[criteria],[examples],[titles],4-5
2,Strong_Fit,Adjacent use cases,[criteria],[examples],[titles],3-4
...
Generate methodology doc AND structured data.
Before delivering:
Why 2 tiers: Simple product, binary fit (devs use it or don't), self-serve model.
Tier 1: Power Users — Individual developers already using similar tools, active on GitHub, blog about tooling Tier 2: Team Adoption — Engineering teams at companies >20 devs, standardizing toolchain
Exclusions: Non-technical roles, companies without engineering teams
Why 3 tiers: Clear market segments by company size, different sales motions.
Tier 1: Growth Startups — VC-backed (50-200 employees), scaling fast, modern stack, hiring PMs Tier 2: Mid-Market — Established companies (200-1000), consolidating tools, budget approved Tier 3: Enterprise — Large orgs (1000+), complex procurement, long cycle, high ACV
Exclusions: Solo consultants, <20 employees, specialized industries (construction, film)
Why 5 tiers: Complex product, multiple buyer types, varying use cases, long sales cycles.
Tier 1: Data-First Companies — Tech companies with dedicated data teams, immediate need Tier 2: Digital Transformers — Traditional companies modernizing, strong executive buy-in Tier 3: Regulated Industries — Finance/healthcare with compliance needs, specific requirements Tier 4: Cost Consolidators — Companies replacing legacy tools, price-sensitive Tier 5: Platform Partners — ISVs/consultancies building on the platform
Exclusions: Companies <$10M revenue, no data team, industries we can't serve (defense)
This skill adapts to any business model. Let the customer's reality dictate the tier structure.
stripe projects
Harvest every `ponytail:` comment in the codebase into a debt ledger, so the deliberate shortcuts and deferrals ponytail leaves behind get tracked instead of rotting into "later means never". One-shot report, changes nothing.
okx dex market
okx agentic wallet
gmgn portfolio
okx dapp discovery
okx agent payments protocol
Stripe payment processing with checkout sessions, subscriptions, webhooks, and customer management.
Build comprehensive 3-5 year financial models with revenue projections, cost structures, cash flow analysis, and scenario planning for early-stage startups. Use this skill when creating financial projections, calculating burn rate or runway, modeling fundraising scenarios, or preparing investor-r...
Stock and cryptocurrency analysis with portfolio management and multi-dimensional scoring.
Real-time crypto derivatives positioning, whale tracking, liquidations, and institutional ETF flows across 37 specialized tools.
Master dbt (data build tool) for analytics engineering with model organization, testing, documentation, and incremental strategies. Use when building data transformations, creating data models, or implementing analytics engineering best practices.
ChainClarity explains 700+ crypto whitepapers in plain English, with layered summaries, comparisons, research tools, alerts, and a $4.99 Pro plan.
Stay Ahead with Finalle.ai: The Ultimate Financial News and Tools Platform
AI-powered Pine Script code generator for TradingView
Research stocks at the speed of thought.
Empower your investment strategies with AI signals, option flow data, and advanced chart patterns.
Danelfin review covering its AI stock and ETF scores, rankings, portfolio tools, current pricing, strengths, risks, and alternatives for investors.
A software for comprehensive market sentiment analysis.
'Stock Correlations' App by Freshly.ai: Reveal Stock Patterns and Trends