Discover Framework

Discover Framework - Framework Research & Integration

Overview

This skill helps users research and add new strategic frameworks to the Strategic Frameworks library. The approach is rigorous and evidence-based - only real, documented, proven frameworks are added.

Core principles:

• Evidence-based - Real frameworks with credible sources, not AI-generated
• Comprehensive research - Deep investigation before adding
• Quality validation - Strict criteria to maintain library quality
• Proper integration - Correct file structure and system updates
• Community-driven - Users expand the library collaboratively

Output: New framework file created, integrated into system, and ready to use via use-framework

---

Workflow

Phase 1: Context Gathering (5 minutes)

Goal: Understand what user needs and why.

Questions to ask:

1. Problem/​Need:

   • "What problem or situation needs a framework that's not in our library?"
   • "Why don't existing frameworks fit?"
   • "What's missing from current options?"

2. Framework Knowledge:

   • "Do you have a specific framework in mind, or should I research options?"
   • "If you know the framework name, what is it?"
   • "Where did you hear about it?"

3. Category:

   • "What type of framework are you looking for?"
   • Options: Strategic / Decision / Innovation / Operations / Mental Models

4. Use Case:

   • "How would you use this framework?"
   • "What would it help you accomplish?"

Determine approach:

If user knows specific framework:

• "Great, let's research [Framework Name] deeply and add it"
• Move to Phase 3 (Deep Research)

If user doesn't know specific framework:

• "Let me search for frameworks that fit your need"
• Move to Phase 2 (Search & Selection)

Phase 2: Internet Research & Selection (5-10 minutes)

Goal: Find 2-3 candidate frameworks matching user's need.

Research approach:

1. Formulate search queries:

   • Based on problem type, category, use case
   • Examples:
     • "strategic frameworks for [problem]"
     • "decision-making frameworks for [situation]"
     • "[domain] frameworks for [goal]"

2. Use WebSearch extensively:

   • Search for multiple candidates
   • Look for reputable sources
   • Find frameworks with clear methodology

3. Initial screening: For each candidate, quickly check:

   • Is it a real framework? (not just concept)
   • Does it have clear creator/​origin?
   • Does it have structured methodology?
   • Is it documented somewhere credible?

4. Present options to user:

## Framework Candidates

I found 3 frameworks that might fit:

### 1. [Framework Name] by [Creator]
**What it is:** [1-2 sentence description]
**Why it fits:** [How it addresses user's need]
**Source:** [Where it's documented]

### 2. [Framework Name] by [Creator]
**What it is:** [Description]
**Why it fits:** [Fit reasoning]
**Source:** [Documentation]

### 3. [Framework Name] by [Creator]
**What it is:** [Description]
**Why it fits:** [Fit reasoning]
**Source:** [Documentation]

Which would you like me to research deeply and add to the system?

1. User selects:
   • Get user's choice
   • Proceed to Phase 3 with selected framework

Phase 3: Deep Research & Validation (10-15 minutes)

Goal: Comprehensive investigation of selected framework and validation against quality criteria.

What to research (comprehensive):

Use references/​research-checklist.md as guide. Research systematically:

1. Framework Identity

   • Full name (official)
   • Creator(s) - name(s), credentials
   • Year created/​published
   • Origin story / context of creation
   • Original publication or source

2. Framework Methodology

   • Core structure (phases, steps, components)
   • Key concepts and principles
   • How it works (process flow)
   • What makes it unique
   • Theoretical foundation

3. Practical Application

   • Target audience (who uses it?)
   • Use cases (when to use it?)
   • Implementation process
   • Tools or templates available
   • Typical outcomes

4. Real-World Validation

   • Companies using it (specific names)
   • Leaders/​practitioners using it
   • Success stories / case studies (2-3 specific examples)
   • Industry recognition
   • Academic validation (if applicable)

5. Learning Resources

   • Original book/​paper
   • Key articles or guides
   • Videos or courses
   • Official websites
   • Authoritative secondary sources

6. Keywords for Matching

   • Problem types it addresses
   • Situations where it fits
   • Domain or industry focus
   • Related concepts

Quality validation:

Check against references/​quality-criteria.md. Assess:

FATAL DISQUALIFIERS (Stop if present): 🔴 AI-generated or made-up framework 🔴 No credible sources or citations 🔴 Duplicate of existing framework in library 🔴 Fundamentally flawed methodology 🔴 Controversial/​unethical framework

REQUIRED ELEMENTS (Must have all): ✅ Real creator with credentials ✅ Clear origin and publication date ✅ Structured methodology with steps ✅ Real-world examples (at least 2) ✅ Credible sources (at least 3) ✅ Practical applicability ✅ Unique value vs existing frameworks

NICE TO HAVE (Not required but valuable): ⭐ Multiple case studies ⭐ Tools or templates ⭐ Academic papers ⭐ Wide industry adoption ⭐ Books or comprehensive guides

Validation decision:

• If passes: "This framework meets our quality criteria. Let's add it."
• If fails: "This framework doesn't meet our quality criteria because [reasons]. Let me suggest alternatives: [other options]"
• If marginal: Discuss with user: "This framework is borderline because [concerns]. Should we add it anyway or look for alternatives?"

Phase 4: Framework Creation (5-10 minutes)

Goal: Create properly formatted framework file.

Steps:

1. Determine framework number:

   • Check existing frameworks in frameworks/ folder
   • Find highest number (currently 48)
   • New framework = next sequential number
   • Example: If latest is 48, new framework is 49

2. Create filename:

   • Format: [number]-[framework-name].md
   • Use kebab-case (lowercase with hyphens)
   • Example: 39-scamper-technique.md

3. Use template from references/​framework-template.md:

# [Framework Name]

## Overview

[2-3 sentence description of what this framework is and what it helps accomplish]

## Creator & Origin

**Created by:** [Name(s) with credentials]

**When:** [Year]

**Context:** [Why was it created? What problem was it solving? What was happening at the time?]

**Original source:** [Book, paper, or initial publication]

## Target Audience

**Best for:**
- [User type 1] - [why]
- [User type 2] - [why]
- [User type 3] - [why]

**Not ideal for:**
- [Situation where it doesn't fit]

## When to Use This Framework

**Use this framework when:**
- [Situation 1]
- [Situation 2]
- [Situation 3]

**Don't use this framework when:**
- [Situation where alternative is better]

## Framework Structure

### Phase 1: [Phase Name]

**Goal:** [What this phase accomplishes]

**Key questions:**
- [Question 1]
- [Question 2]
- [Question 3]

**Output:** [What you produce in this phase]

### Phase 2: [Phase Name]

[Same structure for each phase...]

[Continue for all phases/​steps]

## Real-World Examples

### Example 1: [Company/​Person] - [Context]

**Situation:** [What challenge they faced]

**Application:** [How they used the framework]

**Outcome:** [What happened as a result]

### Example 2: [Company/​Person] - [Context]

[Same structure]

### Example 3: [Company/​Person] - [Context]

[Same structure - at least 2 examples required, 3 preferred]

## Notable Users

**Companies:**
- [Company 1]
- [Company 2]
- [Company 3]

**Thought Leaders:**
- [Name 1]
- [Name 2]

## Sources & Further Reading

**Essential:**
- [Original book/​paper with full citation]
- [Key article or guide]
- [Official website if exists]

**Additional:**
- [Supplementary resource 1]
- [Supplementary resource 2]

**Videos/​Courses:**
- [If available]

## Keywords

For framework matching:
- [keyword1]
- [keyword2]
- [keyword3]
- [problem-type]
- [situation-context]
- [domain/​industry]

1. Fill in all sections:

   • Use research from Phase 3
   • Be comprehensive and specific
   • Include all required elements
   • Use clear, accessible language

2. Review for quality:

   • All sections complete?
   • Specific examples (not generic)?
   • Sources credible and cited?
   • Keywords appropriate?
   • Structure clear and usable?

Phase 5: Integration (5 minutes)

Goal: Integrate new framework into system.

Steps:

1. Save framework file to both locations:

   frameworks/[number]-[framework-name].md
   skills/​use-framework/​references/​frameworks/[number]-[framework-name].md
   

   (Both locations must have identical files)

2. Update frameworks-index.md: Open skills/​choose-framework/​references/​frameworks-index.md

   Add new entry in appropriate category:

   ### [Category Name]
   
   [... existing frameworks ...]
   
   **[Number]. [Framework Name]** by [Creator]
   - [One-line description]
   - **Use for:** [primary use case]
   - **Keywords:** [keyword1], [keyword2], [keyword3]
   

3. Update choose-framework matching logic: Consider if SKILL.md needs updates to mention new framework in:

   • Framework Matching Logic section
   • Relevant category (Strategy/​Decision/​Innovation/​Operations/​Mental Models)

4. Verify integration:

   • Both framework files exist?
   • frameworks-index.md updated?
   • New framework appears in correct category?

Phase 6: Verification & Test Offer (5 minutes)

Goal: Confirm success and offer to test new framework.

Show user what was added:

# Framework Successfully Added! 🎉

## What was created:

**Framework:** [Framework Name] by [Creator]
**Number:** [XX]
**Category:** [Strategic/​Decision/​Innovation/​Operations/​Mental Models]
**Files created:**
- `frameworks/[filename].md`
- `skills/​use-framework/​references/​frameworks/[filename].md`

**Index updated:**
- Added to `frameworks-index.md` under [Category]

## Framework Summary

[2-3 sentences about the framework]

**Best for:** [Primary use cases]

**Notable users:** [2-3 companies/​people]

## Next Steps

Would you like to:
1. **Test the framework:** Use `/​use-framework [Framework Name]` to try it with your situation
2. **Add another framework:** Use `/​discover-framework` again
3. **Learn more:** I can explain how to apply this framework

Offer to test:

• "Want to try this framework on your problem? I can guide you through it using /​use-framework [name]"
• If yes: Transition to use-framework with the new framework
• If no: "Great! The framework is now available in the system for anyone to use."

---

Special Cases

Framework Already Exists

If during research you discover framework is already in library (maybe under different name):

Response: "I found that [Framework Name] is already in our library as [Existing Framework].

[Show existing framework details]

Would you like to:

1. Use the existing framework with /​use-framework [name]
2. Look for a different framework
3. Improve the existing framework documentation"

Framework Fails Quality Criteria

If framework doesn't meet quality standards:

Response: "I researched [Framework Name], but it doesn't meet our quality criteria because:

• [Specific reason 1 - e.g., no credible sources]
• [Specific reason 2 - e.g., AI-generated content]
• [Specific reason 3 - e.g., no real-world validation]

Our library maintains high quality standards - we only add real, proven frameworks.

Would you like me to:

1. Search for alternative frameworks that solve your need
2. Investigate a different framework you have in mind
3. Work with existing frameworks in the library"

Duplicate Framework (Different Name)

If new framework is essentially same as existing one:

Response: "[Framework Name] is very similar to [Existing Framework] already in our library. They both:

• [Similarity 1]
• [Similarity 2]

The main difference is [key difference].

Would you like to:

1. Use the existing [Existing Framework]
2. Add this as a variant (if difference is meaningful)
3. Look for a more distinct framework"

Framework Needs More Research

If you can't find enough information:

Response: "I found [Framework Name] but couldn't find enough credible information to add it:

• Missing: [What's missing - creator, methodology, examples, sources]

This might mean:

• Framework is too new/​obscure
• Framework is not well-documented
• Framework might not be real/​established

Would you like to:

1. Help me find more sources about this framework
2. Look for better-documented alternatives
3. Consider existing frameworks that might work"

---

Quality Checklist

Before marking framework as complete, verify:

Research completeness:

• Creator identified with credentials
• Year and origin story documented
• Methodology clearly explained
• At least 2 real-world examples found
• At least 3 credible sources cited
• Keywords identified for matching

Quality criteria met:

• Real framework (not AI-generated)
• Credible sources exist
• Not duplicate of existing framework
• Structured methodology with steps
• Practical applicability demonstrated
• Unique value proposition clear

Integration complete:

• Framework file created in frameworks/
• Framework file copied to skills/​use-framework/​references/​frameworks/
• frameworks-index.md updated
• Appropriate category selected
• Keywords added for matching

File quality:

• All template sections filled
• Specific examples (not generic)
• Sources properly cited
• Clear and accessible language
• Usable structure for workshops

---

Key Reminders

1. Use WebSearch extensively - This skill depends on web research
2. Validate rigorously - Quality standards protect library integrity
3. Be skeptical - Many "frameworks" online are made-up or low-quality
4. Document thoroughly - Create comprehensive framework files
5. Test fit - Framework should fill gap in current library
6. Integrate properly - Files in both locations, index updated
7. Offer to test - Let user try their new framework immediately

---

Warning Signs (Don't Add These)

🚫 AI-generated frameworks - ChatGPT created, no real origin 🚫 Blog post "frameworks" - Random blog coined term, no adoption 🚫 Unvalidated methodologies - No one actually uses it 🚫 Repackaged existing frameworks - Just renamed something that exists 🚫 Overly complex academic models - Theory with no practical application 🚫 Fad frameworks - Trendy but no substance 🚫 Self-help guru "systems" - Motivational speech, not framework

Test: Would serious business leaders, academics, or practitioners use this? If not, don't add it.

---

References

• references/​framework-template.md - Template structure for new frameworks
• references/​research-checklist.md - What to research about frameworks
• references/​quality-criteria.md - Standards for accepting frameworks