Codex Collaboration Skill
codex-collaboration
Codex CLI integration for code review and consultation. Use when: (1) code needs review before commit, (2) need expert consultation on implementation approach, (3) debugging assistance needed. This skill provides Codex interaction patterns only - workflow orchestration is defined in project CLAUD...
SKILL.md
Full skill instructions
Codex Collaboration Skill
Provides Codex CLI interaction patterns for code review and consultation.
Codex CLI Commands
Code Review (Primary Use)
# Standard review
codex review --uncommitted
# Review specific changes
codex exec -m gpt-5.2 "
Review this implementation:
$(git diff)
Check:
1. Correctness
2. Bugs
3. Security
4. Code quality
5. Edge cases
Verdict: PASS or FAIL with issues
"
Consultation
# Ask for guidance
codex exec -m gpt-5.2 "
Context: [CONTEXT]
Question: [SPECIFIC_QUESTION]
"
# Interactive session
codex "Help me with [TOPIC]"
Full Auto Execution
# Let Codex make changes
codex --full-auto "Implement [TASK]"
# With workspace access
codex -C /path/to/project --full-auto "Task"
Review Gate Pattern
Code Change
│
▼
codex review
│
├── PASS → git commit
│
└── FAIL → Fix issues → Re-review
Review Result Handling
PASS:
git add .
git commit -m "type(scope): description"
FAIL:
- Parse issues from output
- Fix each issue
- Re-submit:
codex review - Repeat until PASS
Model Options
gpt-5.2- Latest flagship (recommended)gpt-5.1-codex-mini- Faster, cheaper
Usage Examples
Before Commit
# After implementing a feature
codex review
# If PASS, commit
# If FAIL, fix and re-review
When Stuck
codex exec -m gpt-5.2 "
I'm implementing [TASK].
Current code: [CODE]
Issue: [PROBLEM]
What's the best approach?
"
Architecture Decision
codex exec -m gpt-5.2 "
Option A: [APPROACH_A]
Option B: [APPROACH_B]
Constraints: [CONSTRAINTS]
Which is better and why?
"