Delegate independent tasks to specialized agents working concurrently with isolated context.
Claudemem Multi-Agent Orchestration
claudemem-orchestration
Multi-agent code analysis orchestration using claudemem. Share claudemem output across parallel agents. Enables parallel investigation, consensus analysis, and role-based command mapping.
SKILL.md
Full skill instructions
Claudemem Multi-Agent Orchestration
Version: 1.0.0 Purpose: Coordinate multiple agents using shared claudemem output
Overview
When multiple agents need to investigate the same codebase:
- Run claudemem ONCE to get structural overview
- Write output to shared file in session directory
- Launch agents in parallel - all read the same file
- Consolidate results with consensus analysis
This pattern avoids redundant claudemem calls and enables consensus-based prioritization.
For parallel execution patterns, see: orchestration:multi-model-validation skill
Claudemem-Specific Patterns
This skill focuses on claudemem-specific orchestration. For general parallel execution:
- 4-Message Pattern - See
orchestration:multi-model-validationPattern 1 - Session Setup - See
orchestration:multi-model-validationPattern 0 - Statistics Collection - See
orchestration:multi-model-validationPattern 7
Pattern 1: Shared Claudemem Output
Purpose: Run expensive claudemem commands ONCE, share results across agents.
# Create unique session directory (per orchestration:multi-model-validation Pattern 0)
SESSION_ID="analysis-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)-$(head -c 4 /dev/urandom | xxd -p)"
SESSION_DIR="/tmp/${SESSION_ID}"
mkdir -p "$SESSION_DIR"
# Run claudemem ONCE, write to shared files
claudemem --nologo map "feature area" --raw > "$SESSION_DIR/structure-map.md"
claudemem --nologo test-gaps --raw > "$SESSION_DIR/test-gaps.md" 2>&1 || echo "No gaps found" > "$SESSION_DIR/test-gaps.md"
claudemem --nologo dead-code --raw > "$SESSION_DIR/dead-code.md" 2>&1 || echo "No dead code" > "$SESSION_DIR/dead-code.md"
# Export session info
echo "$SESSION_ID" > "$SESSION_DIR/session-id.txt"
Why shared output matters:
- Claudemem indexing is expensive (full AST parse)
- Same index serves all queries in session
- Parallel agents reading same file = no redundant computation
Pattern 2: Role-Based Agent Distribution
After running claudemem, distribute to role-specific agents:
# Parallel Execution (ONLY Task calls - per 4-Message Pattern)
Task: architect-detective
Prompt: "Analyze architecture from $SESSION_DIR/structure-map.md.
Focus on layer boundaries and design patterns.
Write findings to $SESSION_DIR/architect-analysis.md"
---
Task: tester-detective
Prompt: "Analyze test gaps from $SESSION_DIR/test-gaps.md.
Prioritize coverage recommendations.
Write findings to $SESSION_DIR/tester-analysis.md"
---
Task: developer-detective
Prompt: "Analyze dead code from $SESSION_DIR/dead-code.md.
Identify cleanup opportunities.
Write findings to $SESSION_DIR/developer-analysis.md"
All 3 execute simultaneously (3x speedup!)
Pattern 3: Consolidation with Ultrathink
Task: ultrathink-detective
Prompt: "Consolidate analyses from:
- $SESSION_DIR/architect-analysis.md
- $SESSION_DIR/tester-analysis.md
- $SESSION_DIR/developer-analysis.md
Create unified report with prioritized action items.
Write to $SESSION_DIR/consolidated-analysis.md"
Role-Based Command Mapping
| Agent Role | Primary Commands | Secondary Commands | Focus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | map, dead-code | context | Structure, cleanup |
| Developer | callers, callees, impact | symbol | Modification scope |
| Tester | test-gaps | callers | Coverage priorities |
| Debugger | context, impact | symbol, callers | Error tracing |
| Ultrathink | ALL | ALL | Comprehensive |
Sequential Investigation Flow
For complex bugs or features requiring ordered investigation:
Phase 1: Architecture Understanding
claudemem --nologo map "problem area" --raw
Identify high-PageRank symbols (> 0.05)
Phase 2: Symbol Deep Dive
For each high-PageRank symbol:
claudemem --nologo context <symbol> --raw
Document dependencies and callers
Phase 3: Impact Assessment (v0.4.0+)
claudemem --nologo impact <primary-symbol> --raw
Document full blast radius
Phase 4: Gap Analysis (v0.4.0+)
claudemem --nologo test-gaps --min-pagerank 0.01 --raw
Identify coverage holes in affected code
Phase 5: Action Planning
Prioritize by: PageRank * impact_depth * test_coverage
Agent System Prompt Integration
When an agent needs deep code analysis, it should reference the claudemem skill:
---
skills: code-analysis:claudemem-search, code-analysis:claudemem-orchestration
---
The agent then follows this pattern:
- Check claudemem status:
claudemem status - Index if needed:
claudemem index - Run appropriate command based on role
- Write results to session file for sharing
- Return brief summary to orchestrator
Best Practices
Do:
- Run claudemem ONCE per investigation type
- Write all output to session directory
- Use parallel execution for independent analyses (see
orchestration:multi-model-validation) - Consolidate with ultrathink for cross-perspective insights
- Handle empty results gracefully
Don't:
- Run same claudemem command multiple times
- Let each agent run its own claudemem (wasteful)
- Skip the consolidation step
- Forget to clean up session directory (automatic TTL cleanup via
session-start.sh)
Session Lifecycle Management
Automatic TTL Cleanup:
The session-start.sh hook automatically cleans up expired session directories:
- Default TTL: 24 hours
- Runs at session start
- Cleans
/tmp/analysis-*,/tmp/review-*directories older than TTL - See
plugins/code-analysis/hooks/session-start.shfor implementation
Manual Cleanup:
# Clean up specific session
rm -rf "$SESSION_DIR"
# Clean all old sessions (24+ hours)
find /tmp -maxdepth 1 -name "analysis-*" -o -name "review-*" -mtime +1 -exec rm -rf {} \;
Error Handling Templates
For robust orchestration, handle common claudemem errors. See claudemem-search skill for complete error handling templates:
Empty Results
RESULT=$(claudemem --nologo map "query" --raw 2>/dev/null)
if [ -z "$RESULT" ] || echo "$RESULT" | grep -q "No results found"; then
echo "No results - try broader keywords or check index status"
fi
Version Compatibility
# Check if command is available (v0.4.0+ commands)
if claudemem --nologo dead-code --raw 2>&1 | grep -q "unknown command"; then
echo "dead-code requires claudemem v0.4.0+"
echo "Fallback: Use map command instead"
fi
Index Status
# Verify index before running commands
if ! claudemem status 2>&1 | grep -qE "[0-9]+ (chunks|symbols)"; then
echo "Index not found - run: claudemem index"
exit 1
fi
Reference: For complete error handling patterns, see templates in code-analysis:claudemem-search skill (Templates 1-5)
Maintained by: MadAppGang Plugin: code-analysis v2.6.0 Last Updated: December 2025
More Other skills
brand-guidelines
Applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography to any sort of artifact that may benefit from having Anthropic's look-and-feel. Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply.
theme-factory
Toolkit for styling artifacts with a theme. These artifacts can be slides, docs, reportings, HTML landing pages, etc. There are 10 pre-set themes with colors/fonts that you can apply to any artifact that has been creating, or can generate a new theme on-the-fly.
internal-comms
A set of resources to help me write all kinds of internal communications, using the formats that my company likes to use. Claude should use this skill whenever asked to write some sort of internal communications (status reports, leadership updates, 3P updates, company newsletters, FAQs, incident reports, project updates, etc.).
Fundamental design principles for writing maintainable, testable Python code.
responsive-design
Modern responsive layouts using container queries, fluid typography, CSS Grid, and mobile-first strategies.
Generate Playwright tests from scenarios using interactive browser exploration and validation.
Automated website exploration and test case generation using Playwright.
Modern React state management with Redux Toolkit, Zustand, Jotai, and React Query for every state category.
gdpr-data-handling
GDPR-compliant data handling with consent management, data subject rights, and privacy controls.
Python error handling patterns including input validation, exception hierarchies, and partial failure handling. Use when implementing validation logic, designing exception strategies, handling batch processing failures, or building robust APIs.
refactor-plan
Detailed multi-file refactor planning with safety checks and rollback guidance.
