C3 Container Level Exploration

C3 Container Level Exploration

⛔ CRITICAL GATE: Load Parent Context + Current Container First

STOP - Before ANY container-level work, execute:

# Load parent Context (REQUIRED - containers inherit from here)
cat .c3/​README.md 2>/​dev/​null || echo "NO_CONTEXT"

# Load current container (if exists)
cat .c3/​c3-{N}-*/​README.md 2>/​dev/​null || echo "NO_CONTAINER_DOC"

# Load settings
cat .c3/​settings.yaml 2>/​dev/​null || echo "NO_SETTINGS"

Based on output:

• If "NO_CONTEXT" → STOP. Context must exist first. Escalate to c3-context-design.
• If container doc exists → Read it completely before proposing changes
• Extract from Context: boundary, protocols, actors, cross-cutting concerns for this container

⚠️ DO NOT read ADRs unless user specifically asks:

• Container work focuses on current structure, not historical decisions
• ADRs add unnecessary context → hallucination risk
• Only read: Context, this Container, sibling Containers (if coordination needed)

Why this gate exists: Containers INHERIT from Context. Proposing changes without understanding inherited constraints causes conflicts.

Self-check before proceeding:

• I executed the commands above
• I read parent Context doc
• I know what constraints this container inherits
• I read existing container doc (if exists)

---

Overview

The Container level is the architectural command center of C3:

• Full context awareness from above (inherits from Context)
• Complete control over component responsibilities below
• Mediator for all interactions

Position: MIDDLE (c3-{N}) | Parent: Context (c3-0) | Children: Components (c3-{N}NN)

📁 File Location: Container is .c3/​c3-{N}-{slug}/​README.md - a folder with README inside.

Announce: "I'm using the c3-container-design skill to explore Container-level impact."

---

The Principle

Upper layer defines WHAT. Lower layer implements HOW.

At Container level:

• Context defines WHAT I am (my existence, my responsibility)
• I define WHAT components exist and WHAT they do
• Component implements my definitions (HOW it works)
• I do NOT define how components work internally - that's Component's job

Integrity rules:

• I must be listed in Context before I can exist
• Components cannot exist without being listed in my inventory

---

Container Archetypes

---

Include/​Exclude

Litmus test: "Is this about WHAT components do and HOW they relate to each other?"

---

Exploration Process

Phase 1: Verify Inheritance

From loaded Context, extract for this container:

• Boundary: What can/​cannot access
• Protocols: What we implement (provider/​consumer)
• Actors: Who we serve
• Cross-cutting: Patterns we must follow (auth, logging, errors)

Phase 2: Analyze Change Impact

Phase 3: Socratic Discovery

By archetype:

• Service: Responsibility? Key components? Critical flows?
• Data: Engine/​version? Schema? Access patterns?
• Boundary: Contract? Client? Fallback?
• Platform: Processes? Affected containers?

---

Template

See container-template.md for complete structure with frontmatter, diagrams, and examples.

Required sections:

1. Inherited From Context
2. Overview
3. Technology Stack
4. Architecture - External Relationships (diagram + interface mapping table)
5. Architecture - Internal Structure (diagram with Foundation/​Business layering)
6. Component Layering Rules
7. Components table
8. Key Flows

---

Diagram Requirements

Container level REQUIRES two diagrams:

1. External Relationships - Shows connections to other containers/​external systems
2. Internal Structure - Shows how components relate to each other

Use Mermaid only - no ASCII art.

---

⛔ Enforcement Harnesses

Harness 1: Template Fidelity

Rule: Output MUST match template structure exactly.

Required sections (in order):

1. Frontmatter (id, c3-version, title, type, parent, summary)
2. Inherited From Context
3. Overview
4. Technology Stack
5. Architecture - External Relationships (diagram REQUIRED)
6. Architecture - Internal Structure (diagram REQUIRED)
7. Components
8. Key Flows

🚩 Red Flags:

• Sections missing or reordered
• Only one diagram (need BOTH)
• Missing "Inherited From Context" section

Harness 2: Two Diagrams Required

Rule: Container docs MUST have both External and Internal diagrams.

# Verify both diagrams exist
grep -c '```mermaid' .c3/​c3-{N}-*/​README.md  # Should be >= 2

---

Verification Checklist

Before claiming completion, execute:

# Verify container doc exists in correct location
ls .c3/​c3-*-*/​README.md

# Verify frontmatter
grep -E "^id:|^type:|^parent:" .c3/​c3-{N}-*/​README.md

# Verify BOTH mermaid diagrams exist
mermaid_count=$(grep -c '```mermaid' .c3/​c3-{N}-*/​README.md)
echo "Mermaid diagrams: $mermaid_count (need >= 2)"

• Critical gate executed (Context + current container loaded)
• Container is listed in Context's container inventory
• "Inherited From Context" section populated from parent
• Template sections present in correct order
• BOTH diagrams included (External + Internal)
• Components listed with responsibilities
• Downstream delegation identified (c3-component-design)

---

📚 Reading Chain Output

At the end of container work, output a reading chain for components and related containers.

Format:

## 📚 To Go Deeper

This container (c3-N) contains:

**Components to explore:**
├─ c3-N01-{slug} - [responsibility, why it matters]
├─ c3-N02-{slug} - [responsibility, why it matters]
└─ ...

**Parent (inherited constraints):**
└─ c3-0 (Context) - [what this container inherits]

**Sibling containers (if coordination needed):**
└─ c3-M-{slug} - [why coordination matters]

*Reading chain generated from components listed in this Container.*

Rules:

• List components from the Container's inventory
• Highlight which components are affected by this change
• Include parent Context for constraint reference
• Never include ADRs unless user asked

---

Change Impact Decision

flowchart TD
    A[Analyze Change] --> B{New protocol or<br/>boundary violation?}
    B -->|yes| C[Escalate to<br/>c3-context-design]
    B -->|no| D{Component org<br/>change?}
    D -->|yes| E[Delegate to<br/>c3-component-design]
    D -->|no| F[Document at<br/>Container level]

---

Common Rationalizations

---

Common Mistakes

---

Related

• references/​core-principle.md - The C3 principle
• defaults.md - Container layer rules
• references/​container-archetypes.md - Container types
• references/​diagram-decision-framework.md - When to use which diagram