Skip to content
ab-testing-statistician logo

A/B Testing Statistician

ab-testing-statistician

Expert in statistical analysis for blind A/B and ABX audio testing. Validates randomization, calculates statistical significance, and ensures proper experimental design. Use when implementing A/B test features or analyzing test results.

SKILL.md

Full skill instructions

A/​B Testing Statistician

Specialized agent for designing and validating blind audio comparison tests (A/​B, Blind AB, ABX) with proper statistical analysis.

Overview of Audio A/​B Testing

Test Modes

ModeDescriptionUser Knows?Purpose
ABSwitch between A and BYesQuick comparison, training
Blind ABA and B randomly mapped to Options 1 and 2NoUnbiased preference detection
ABXX is secretly either A or B, user guessesNoAudibility testing (can you hear the difference?)

Why Blind Testing Matters

Confirmation Bias: Listeners tend to prefer what they expect to be better.

Example:

Non-blind: "This expensive cable sounds clearer!" (placebo effect)
Blind: "I can't tell the difference" (objective reality)

Session Management

Session State (Rust)

#[derive(Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)]
pub struct ABSession {
    pub mode: ABTestMode,           // AB, BlindAB, or ABX
    pub preset_a_name: String,
    pub preset_b_name: String,
    pub trim_db: f32,               // Loudness compensation for B
    pub total_trials: usize,
    pub current_trial: usize,
    pub hidden_mapping: Vec<bool>,  // For BlindAB: true = Option1 is A
    pub x_is_a: Vec<bool>,          // For ABX: true = X is A
    pub answers: Vec<ABAnswer>,     // User responses
}

#[derive(Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)]
pub enum ABTestMode {
    AB,       // Non-blind switching
    BlindAB,  // Blind preference test
    ABX,      // Blind audibility test
}

#[derive(Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)]
pub struct ABAnswer {
    pub trial: usize,
    pub selected_option: String,    // "A", "B", "1", "2", or "X"
    pub timestamp: u64,             // Milliseconds since session start
}

Randomization (Critical!)

BlindAB Mode: Each trial randomly maps A/​B to Options 1/​2:

pub fn create_blind_ab_session(
    preset_a: String,
    preset_b: String,
    num_trials: usize,
    trim_db: f32,
) -> ABSession {
    use rand::Rng;
    let mut rng = rand::thread_rng();

    // Randomize each trial independently
    let hidden_mapping: Vec<bool> = (0..num_trials)
        .map(|_| rng.gen_bool(0.5)) // 50% chance Option1 = A
        .collect();

    ABSession {
        mode: ABTestMode::BlindAB,
        preset_a_name: preset_a,
        preset_b_name: preset_b,
        trim_db,
        total_trials: num_trials,
        current_trial: 0,
        hidden_mapping,
        x_is_a: vec![],
        answers: vec![],
    }
}

ABX Mode: X is randomly set to A or B for each trial:

pub fn create_abx_session(
    preset_a: String,
    preset_b: String,
    num_trials: usize,
    trim_db: f32,
) -> ABSession {
    use rand::Rng;
    let mut rng = rand::thread_rng();

    // Randomize X for each trial
    let x_is_a: Vec<bool> = (0..num_trials)
        .map(|_| rng.gen_bool(0.5)) // 50% chance X = A
        .collect();

    ABSession {
        mode: ABTestMode::ABX,
        preset_a_name: preset_a,
        preset_b_name: preset_b,
        trim_db,
        total_trials: num_trials,
        current_trial: 0,
        hidden_mapping: vec![],
        x_is_a,
        answers: vec![],
    }
}

Critical Rule: Randomize PER TRIAL, not once for all trials!

❌ Wrong:

let option1_is_a = rng.gen_bool(0.5);
// Use same mapping for all trials

✅ Correct:

let hidden_mapping: Vec<bool> = (0..num_trials)
    .map(|_| rng.gen_bool(0.5))
    .collect();

Loudness Compensation (Trim Parameter)

Problem: Louder = perceived as "better" (Fletcher-Munson curves)

Solution: Level-match presets before testing

Auto-Calculate Trim

pub fn calculate_auto_trim(
    bands_a: &[ParametricBand],
    preamp_a: f32,
    bands_b: &[ParametricBand],
    preamp_b: f32,
) -> f32 {
    use crate::audio_math::calculate_peak_gain;

    let peak_a = calculate_peak_gain(bands_a, preamp_a);
    let peak_b = calculate_peak_gain(bands_b, preamp_b);

    // Adjust B to match A's peak level
    peak_a - peak_b
}

Apply Trim to Preset B

pub fn apply_preset_with_trim(
    bands: &[ParametricBand],
    preamp: f32,
    trim_db: f32,
) -> Result<(), String> {
    let adjusted_preamp = preamp + trim_db;

    // Apply to EqualizerAPO
    write_eapo_config(bands, adjusted_preamp)?;

    Ok(())
}

Example:

Preset A: Peak gain = -2 dB
Preset B: Peak gain = +1 dB
Trim = -2 - (+1) = -3 dB

Apply Preset B with -3 dB trim → Both have -2 dB peak

Statistical Analysis

Preference Analysis (BlindAB)

Count how many times each preset was preferred:

pub struct PreferenceResults {
    pub a_selected: usize,
    pub b_selected: usize,
    pub total_trials: usize,
    pub a_percentage: f64,
    pub b_percentage: f64,
    pub p_value: f64,  // Statistical significance
}

pub fn analyze_blind_ab(session: &ABSession) -> PreferenceResults {
    let mut a_count = 0;
    let mut b_count = 0;

    for (i, answer) in session.answers.iter().enumerate() {
        let option1_is_a = session.hidden_mapping[i];

        let selected_a = match answer.selected_option.as_str() {
            "1" => option1_is_a,
            "2" => !option1_is_a,
            _ => continue,
        };

        if selected_a {
            a_count += 1;
        } else {
            b_count += 1;
        }
    }

    let total = a_count + b_count;
    let a_pct = (a_count as f64 / total as f64) * 100.0;
    let b_pct = (b_count as f64 / total as f64) * 100.0;

    // Binomial test: is this significantly different from 50/​50?
    let p_value = binomial_test(a_count, total, 0.5);

    PreferenceResults {
        a_selected: a_count,
        b_selected: b_count,
        total_trials: total,
        a_percentage: a_pct,
        b_percentage: b_pct,
        p_value,
    }
}

ABX Analysis (Audibility Test)

Count correct vs incorrect identifications:

pub struct ABXResults {
    pub correct: usize,
    pub incorrect: usize,
    pub total_trials: usize,
    pub accuracy: f64,
    pub p_value: f64,
}

pub fn analyze_abx(session: &ABSession) -> ABXResults {
    let mut correct = 0;
    let mut incorrect = 0;

    for (i, answer) in session.answers.iter().enumerate() {
        let x_is_a = session.x_is_a[i];

        let guessed_a = match answer.selected_option.as_str() {
            "A" => true,
            "B" => false,
            _ => continue,
        };

        if guessed_a == x_is_a {
            correct += 1;
        } else {
            incorrect += 1;
        }
    }

    let total = correct + incorrect;
    let accuracy = (correct as f64 / total as f64) * 100.0;

    // Binomial test: is this better than 50% guessing?
    let p_value = binomial_test(correct, total, 0.5);

    ABXResults {
        correct,
        incorrect,
        total_trials: total,
        accuracy,
        p_value,
    }
}

Binomial Test (P-Value)

Null Hypothesis: User is guessing randomly (50% chance)

P-Value: Probability of seeing this result (or more extreme) by chance

fn binomial_test(successes: usize, trials: usize, p_null: f64) -> f64 {
    use statrs::distribution::{Binomial, Discrete};

    let dist = Binomial::new(p_null, trials as u64).unwrap();

    // Two-tailed test
    let observed = successes as u64;
    let expected = (trials as f64 * p_null) as u64;

    let p_observed = dist.pmf(observed);
    let mut p_value = p_observed;

    // Add probabilities of more extreme outcomes
    for k in 0..=trials as u64 {
        let p_k = dist.pmf(k);
        if p_k <= p_observed && k != observed {
            p_value += p_k;
        }
    }

    p_value.min(1.0)
}

Interpretation:

  • p < 0.05: Significant - unlikely to be chance (95% confidence)
  • p < 0.01: Highly significant - very unlikely to be chance (99% confidence)
  • p >= 0.05: Not significant - could be random guessing

Example:

ABX Test: 15/​20 correct (75% accuracy)
P-value = 0.041

Interpretation: Statistically significant at 95% level.
User can reliably hear the difference.

Sample Size Requirements

How many trials needed for reliable results?

Rule of Thumb:

  • Small effect: 50+ trials
  • Medium effect: 20-30 trials
  • Large effect: 10-15 trials

Formula (ABX test, 80% power):

n = (Z_α/​2 + Z_β)² * p(1-p) / (p - 0.5)²

Where:
- Z_α/​2 = 1.96 (for α = 0.05, two-tailed)
- Z_β = 0.84 (for 80% power)
- p = expected accuracy

Example:

Expected accuracy: 70%
n = (1.96 + 0.84)² * 0.7 * 0.3 / (0.7 - 0.5)²
n ≈ 41 trials

Recommended Trial Counts

pub fn recommended_trial_count(expected_accuracy: f64) -> usize {
    if expected_accuracy <= 0.55 {
        100 // Very subtle difference
    } else if expected_accuracy <= 0.65 {
        50  // Small difference
    } else if expected_accuracy <= 0.75 {
        25  // Medium difference
    } else {
        15  // Large difference
    }
}

Results Export

CSV Format

pub fn export_to_csv(session: &ABSession) -> String {
    let mut csv = String::from("Trial,Option1,Option2,Selected,Timestamp\n");

    for (i, answer) in session.answers.iter().enumerate() {
        let (opt1, opt2) = if session.mode == ABTestMode::BlindAB {
            if session.hidden_mapping[i] {
                (&session.preset_a_name, &session.preset_b_name)
            } else {
                (&session.preset_b_name, &session.preset_a_name)
            }
        } else {
            ("A", "B")
        };

        csv.push_str(&format!(
            "{},{},{},{},{}\n",
            i + 1,
            opt1,
            opt2,
            answer.selected_option,
            answer.timestamp
        ));
    }

    csv
}

Output:

Trial,Option1,Option2,Selected,Timestamp
1,Flat,Boosted,1,1234
2,Boosted,Flat,2,2456
3,Flat,Boosted,1,3789

JSON Format

pub fn export_to_json(
    session: &ABSession,
    results: &PreferenceResults,
) -> String {
    let export = serde_json::json!({
        "mode": session.mode,
        "presets": {
            "a": session.preset_a_name,
            "b": session.preset_b_name,
        },
        "trim_db": session.trim_db,
        "trials": session.total_trials,
        "results": {
            "a_selected": results.a_selected,
            "b_selected": results.b_selected,
            "a_percentage": results.a_percentage,
            "b_percentage": results.b_percentage,
            "p_value": results.p_value,
            "significant": results.p_value < 0.05,
        },
        "answers": session.answers,
    });

    serde_json::to_string_pretty(&export).unwrap()
}

Experimental Design Best Practices

1. Counterbalancing

Ensure equal distribution of A and B across trials:

pub fn validate_counterbalancing(hidden_mapping: &[bool]) -> f64 {
    let a_count = hidden_mapping.iter().filter(|&&x| x).count();
    let total = hidden_mapping.len();
    let ratio = a_count as f64 / total as f64;

    // Should be close to 0.5
    (ratio - 0.5).abs()
}

Warning threshold:

if validate_counterbalancing(&session.hidden_mapping) > 0.15 {
    println!("Warning: Unbalanced randomization (>15% deviation from 50/​50)");
}

2. Trial Independence

Each trial should be independent:

  • ✅ Randomize per trial
  • ❌ Use patterns (ABABAB...)
  • ❌ Fixed order

3. Rest Breaks

Prevent listener fatigue:

if (currentTrial % 10 === 0 && currentTrial !== totalTrials) {
  showRestBreakDialog();
}

4. Reference Switching

Allow listeners to switch between options multiple times before answering:

let switchCount = 0;

function handleSwitch() {
  switchCount++;
  applyOpposite();
}

// Log switch count as quality metric

Common Pitfalls

❌ Volume Mismatch

// WRONG: Apply presets without level matching
applyPresetA();
applyPresetB();

// CORRECT: Apply with trim
applyPreset(presetA, 0);
applyPreset(presetB, trimDb);

❌ Non-Random Patterns

// WRONG: Alternating pattern
let hidden_mapping = vec![true, false, true, false, ...];

// CORRECT: True randomization
let hidden_mapping: Vec<bool> = (0..trials)
    .map(|_| rng.gen_bool(0.5))
    .collect();

❌ Ignoring P-Value

// WRONG: Report raw percentages without significance
"Preset A preferred 55% of the time"

// CORRECT: Include statistical context
"Preset A preferred 55% (p=0.42, not significant)"

❌ Too Few Trials

// WRONG: Only 5 trials
const trials = 5; // Unreliable!

// CORRECT: Adequate sample size
const trials = 20; // Minimum for medium effects

Validation Tests

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
    use super::*;

    #[test]
    fn test_randomization_distribution() {
        let session = create_blind_ab_session("A".into(), "B".into(), 1000, 0.0);

        let a_count = session.hidden_mapping.iter().filter(|&&x| x).count();
        let ratio = a_count as f64 / 1000.0;

        // With 1000 trials, should be very close to 0.5
        assert!((ratio - 0.5).abs() < 0.05, "Randomization biased: {}", ratio);
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_trial_independence() {
        let session = create_blind_ab_session("A".into(), "B".into(), 100, 0.0);

        // Count runs (consecutive same values)
        let mut runs = 1;
        for i in 1..session.hidden_mapping.len() {
            if session.hidden_mapping[i] != session.hidden_mapping[i - 1] {
                runs += 1;
            }
        }

        // Expected runs ≈ n/​2 for random data
        let expected_runs = 50.0;
        let deviation = (runs as f64 - expected_runs).abs() / expected_runs;

        assert!(deviation < 0.3, "Trials may not be independent");
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_binomial_test() {
        // 20/​20 correct should be highly significant
        let p = binomial_test(20, 20, 0.5);
        assert!(p < 0.001);

        // 10/​20 correct should not be significant (random guessing)
        let p = binomial_test(10, 20, 0.5);
        assert!(p > 0.05);
    }
}

Reference Materials

  • references/​statistical_tests.md - Detailed statistical methods
  • references/​experimental_design.md - Best practices for audio testing
  • references/​sample_size_calculator.md - Power analysis formulas

More Other skills

Delegate independent tasks to specialized agents working concurrently with isolated context.

295.4K 206.3K
View

Applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography to any sort of artifact that may benefit from having Anthropic's look-and-feel. Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply.

179.7K 100.1K
View

Toolkit for styling artifacts with a theme. These artifacts can be slides, docs, reportings, HTML landing pages, etc. There are 10 pre-set themes with colors/fonts that you can apply to any artifact that has been creating, or can generate a new theme on-the-fly.

179.7K 89.5K
View

A set of resources to help me write all kinds of internal communications, using the formats that my company likes to use. Claude should use this skill whenever asked to write some sort of internal communications (status reports, leadership updates, 3P updates, company newsletters, FAQs, incident reports, project updates, etc.).

179.7K 76.1K
View

Fundamental design principles for writing maintainable, testable Python code.

40.2K 21.9K
View

Modern responsive layouts using container queries, fluid typography, CSS Grid, and mobile-first strategies.

40.2K 20K
View

Generate Playwright tests from scenarios using interactive browser exploration and validation.

39.7K 18.2K
View

Modern React state management with Redux Toolkit, Zustand, Jotai, and React Query for every state category.

40.2K 14.7K
View

GDPR-compliant data handling with consent management, data subject rights, and privacy controls.

40.2K 14.3K
View

Python error handling patterns including input validation, exception hierarchies, and partial failure handling. Use when implementing validation logic, designing exception strategies, handling batch processing failures, or building robust APIs.

40.2K 13.5K
View

Detailed multi-file refactor planning with safety checks and rollback guidance.

39.7K 13K
View