Newsletter Visual Assets

Newsletter Visual Assets

Analyze a newsletter draft, identify the highest-impact opportunities for visual enhancement, and generate on-brand visual assets. Every visual must clarify, persuade, or engage — never decorate.

Core Principle: Visuals earn their place through measurable impact on clarity, engagement, or persuasion. A newsletter with zero visuals is better than one with decorative filler.

When to Use

Use this skill when:

• Enhancing a newsletter draft with visual assets
• A draft contains [screenshot] placeholders that need strategic evaluation
• The user asks to "add visuals", "create images", or "make this more visual"
• A newsletter draft is text-heavy and could benefit from visual breaks

Prerequisites

A design system must exist before generating any visuals — without one, generated images won't have consistent colors, typography, or style. Check ~/​.claude/​.context/​design-systems/ for available design systems.

• If none exists: Inform the user and offer to invoke creator-stack:design-system to create one. Do not generate visuals without a design system — the results will be inconsistent and off-brand.
• If one exists: Verify its Application Guidelines cover newsletter/​website assets. If they don't, note this to the user and proceed with the closest available style guidance.

Content Type Resolution

Read the relevant reference file before generating any assets — it contains platform-specific constraints (aspect ratios, resolution, email rendering limits) that affect every prompt.

Workflow

Step 1: Audit the Draft

Read the full draft and catalog every section. For each section, evaluate:

1. Existing visuals — Does it already have a [screenshot] placeholder, code block, table, or other visual element? Note what it covers and whether it's sufficient.
2. Complexity — Is the concept hard to explain in text alone? (process flows, architectures, comparisons, data)
3. Engagement risk — Is this a point where readers are likely to disengage? (long text-only stretches, dense technical explanations)
4. Persuasion opportunity — Could a visual make a claim more believable? (cost data, performance comparisons, before/​after scenarios)

Existing [screenshot] placeholders: These represent real UI captures the author will provide. Treat them as existing visuals. Only recommend replacing one if the concept would be better served by a diagram or illustration — and explicitly flag this to the user with justification.

Step 2: Score and Rank Opportunities

For each potential visual opportunity, score on three dimensions (1-5 each):

Total score = Clarity + Engagement + Uniqueness (max 15)

Hard rules:

• Only visuals scoring 10+ make the shortlist
• Maximum 5 visuals per newsletter issue (fewer is often better)
• At least one visual in the first half of the newsletter
• Never add a visual within 150 words of another (visual fatigue)
• Visuals scoring below 8 are never included

Step 3: Select Visual Types

Choose the type based on what the visual needs to accomplish:

Never use illustrations when a diagram would be more informative. Illustrations are for engagement; diagrams are for clarity. When in doubt, choose the one that teaches.

Step 4: Present the Visual Brief

Before generating anything, present the brief to the user for approval:

For each recommended visual:

1. Location — Exact section and paragraph
2. Type — Which visual type
3. Purpose — What it clarifies, persuades, or engages (one sentence)
4. Description — What the visual shows (the concept, not the generation prompt)
5. Score — The three dimension scores and total

Also include:

• Sections where you did NOT recommend visuals and why
• Any [screenshot] placeholders you recommend replacing (with justification)

Do NOT generate prompts or images until the user approves the brief.

Step 5: Generate Visual Assets

After approval, generate each visual using creator-stack:nanobanana.

Design system integration: Load the design system from ~/​.claude/​.context/​design-systems/ and apply it to every prompt — colors, typography, illustration style, brand constraints.

Prompt construction:

[SUBJECT]: What the visual depicts
[COMPOSITION]: Layout, arrangement, spatial relationships
[STYLE]: From the design system — colors, typography, illustration style
[CONSTRAINTS]: What to avoid, what NOT to include
[FORMAT]: Aspect ratio and resolution (from substack-constraints reference)

Prompt rules:

• Be specific about spatial relationships ("left side shows X, right side shows Y")
• Include exact hex colors from the design system
• Specify "no text" or exact text to render (minimize text — AI text rendering is unreliable)
• Always include the style from your design system — never leave style ambiguous
• Never fabricate data that isn't in the source draft

Step 6: Write Captions and Alt Text

For each generated visual:

1. Caption — 1 sentence that adds context the image doesn't show. Good captions answer "so what?" — they don't just describe what's visible.
2. Alt text — Descriptive text for accessibility. Convey informational content, not visual style. ("Bar chart showing agent teams use 7x more tokens than single agents" not "blue and orange bar chart")

Step 7: Verify Against Checklist

Run the quality checklist before presenting final assets.

Voice Application

Invoke creator-stack:voice before finalizing any written output (captions). Voice is applied after the structural draft is complete but before brand compliance.

Invocation point: After writing captions and alt text, before presenting to the user.

Brand Compliance

When creating assets for The AI Launchpad, invoke creator-stack:brand-guidelines to resolve the correct design system and check anti-patterns.

Invocation point: After voice application, as the final quality gate.

Quality Checklist

• Design system loaded before any generation
• Every visual scores 10+ on the clarity/​engagement/​uniqueness scale
• Maximum 5 visuals in the brief
• At least one visual in the first half of the newsletter
• No two visuals within 150 words of each other
• Brief presented and approved before generation
• Every prompt includes design system colors and style
• No fabricated data in any visual
• Captions answer "so what?" (not just describe the image)
• Alt text conveys information, not visual style
• creator-stack:voice invoked for captions
• creator-stack:brand-guidelines invoked for brand compliance

Common Pitfalls

1. Too many visuals (6+): Cap at 5. Force-rank by score. Fewer high-impact visuals beat many mediocre ones.
2. Decorative hero image: Only include a hero if it scores 10+. Most newsletters don't need one.
3. Inventing data: Only visualize data the author provides. Never fabricate statistics.
4. Replacing screenshots without asking: Screenshots are the author's real evidence. Only suggest replacing with explicit justification.
5. Ignoring the design system: Every prompt must reference the design system. No making up colors or styles.
6. Dark-themed images for email: Default to light backgrounds. Dark images look broken in most email clients.
7. Text-heavy images: Minimize text in generated images. Put text in captions instead.
8. Generating before brief approval: Always present the brief first. Wasted assets cost time and API credits.
9. Using illustrations where diagrams belong: If the goal is clarity, use a diagram. Illustrations are for engagement.