Perplexity Migration Deep Dive
perplexity-migration-deep-dive
Execute Perplexity major re-architecture and migration strategies with strangler fig pattern. Use when migrating to or from Perplexity, performing major version upgrades, or re-platforming existing integrations to Perplexity. Trigger with phrases like "migrate perplexity", "perplexity migration",...
SKILL.md
Full skill instructions
Perplexity Migration Deep Dive
Overview
Comprehensive guide for migrating to or from Perplexity, or major version upgrades.
Prerequisites
- Current system documentation
- Perplexity SDK installed
- Feature flag infrastructure
- Rollback strategy tested
Migration Types
| Type | Complexity | Duration | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh install | Low | Days | Low |
| From competitor | Medium | Weeks | Medium |
| Major version | Medium | Weeks | Medium |
| Full replatform | High | Months | High |
Pre-Migration Assessment
Step 1: Current State Analysis
# Document current implementation
find . -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.py" | xargs grep -l "perplexity" > perplexity-files.txt
# Count integration points
wc -l perplexity-files.txt
# Identify dependencies
npm list | grep perplexity
pip freeze | grep perplexity
Step 2: Data Inventory
interface MigrationInventory {
dataTypes: string[];
recordCounts: Record<string, number>;
dependencies: string[];
integrationPoints: string[];
customizations: string[];
}
async function assessPerplexityMigration(): Promise<MigrationInventory> {
return {
dataTypes: await getDataTypes(),
recordCounts: await getRecordCounts(),
dependencies: await analyzeDependencies(),
integrationPoints: await findIntegrationPoints(),
customizations: await documentCustomizations(),
};
}
Migration Strategy: Strangler Fig Pattern
Phase 1: Parallel Run
┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐
│ Old │ │ New │
│ System │ ──▶ │ Perplexity │
│ (100%) │ │ (0%) │
└─────────────┘ └─────────────┘
Phase 2: Gradual Shift
┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐
│ Old │ │ New │
│ (50%) │ ──▶ │ (50%) │
└─────────────┘ └─────────────┘
Phase 3: Complete
┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐
│ Old │ │ New │
│ (0%) │ ──▶ │ (100%) │
└─────────────┘ └─────────────┘
Implementation Plan
Phase 1: Setup (Week 1-2)
# Install Perplexity SDK
npm install @perplexity/sdk
# Configure credentials
cp .env.example .env.perplexity
# Edit with new credentials
# Verify connectivity
node -e "require('@perplexity/sdk').ping()"
Phase 2: Adapter Layer (Week 3-4)
// src/adapters/perplexity.ts
interface ServiceAdapter {
create(data: CreateInput): Promise<Resource>;
read(id: string): Promise<Resource>;
update(id: string, data: UpdateInput): Promise<Resource>;
delete(id: string): Promise<void>;
}
class PerplexityAdapter implements ServiceAdapter {
async create(data: CreateInput): Promise<Resource> {
const perplexityData = this.transform(data);
return perplexityClient.create(perplexityData);
}
private transform(data: CreateInput): PerplexityInput {
// Map from old format to Perplexity format
}
}
Phase 3: Data Migration (Week 5-6)
async function migratePerplexityData(): Promise<MigrationResult> {
const batchSize = 100;
let processed = 0;
let errors: MigrationError[] = [];
for await (const batch of oldSystem.iterateBatches(batchSize)) {
try {
const transformed = batch.map(transform);
await perplexityClient.batchCreate(transformed);
processed += batch.length;
} catch (error) {
errors.push({ batch, error });
}
// Progress update
console.log(`Migrated ${processed} records`);
}
return { processed, errors };
}
Phase 4: Traffic Shift (Week 7-8)
// Feature flag controlled traffic split
function getServiceAdapter(): ServiceAdapter {
const perplexityPercentage = getFeatureFlag('perplexity_migration_percentage');
if (Math.random() * 100 < perplexityPercentage) {
return new PerplexityAdapter();
}
return new LegacyAdapter();
}
Rollback Plan
# Immediate rollback
kubectl set env deployment/app PERPLEXITY_ENABLED=false
kubectl rollout restart deployment/app
# Data rollback (if needed)
./scripts/restore-from-backup.sh --date YYYY-MM-DD
# Verify rollback
curl https://app.yourcompany.com/health | jq '.services.perplexity'
Post-Migration Validation
async function validatePerplexityMigration(): Promise<ValidationReport> {
const checks = [
{ name: 'Data count match', fn: checkDataCounts },
{ name: 'API functionality', fn: checkApiFunctionality },
{ name: 'Performance baseline', fn: checkPerformance },
{ name: 'Error rates', fn: checkErrorRates },
];
const results = await Promise.all(
checks.map(async c => ({ name: c.name, result: await c.fn() }))
);
return { checks: results, passed: results.every(r => r.result.success) };
}
Instructions
Step 1: Assess Current State
Document existing implementation and data inventory.
Step 2: Build Adapter Layer
Create abstraction layer for gradual migration.
Step 3: Migrate Data
Run batch data migration with error handling.
Step 4: Shift Traffic
Gradually route traffic to new Perplexity integration.
Output
- Migration assessment complete
- Adapter layer implemented
- Data migrated successfully
- Traffic fully shifted to Perplexity
Error Handling
| Issue | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Data mismatch | Transform errors | Validate transform logic |
| Performance drop | No caching | Add caching layer |
| Rollback triggered | Errors spiked | Reduce traffic percentage |
| Validation failed | Missing data | Check batch processing |
Examples
Quick Migration Status
const status = await validatePerplexityMigration();
console.log(`Migration ${status.passed ? 'PASSED' : 'FAILED'}`);
status.checks.forEach(c => console.log(` ${c.name}: ${c.result.success}`));
Resources
Flagship+ Skills
For advanced troubleshooting, see perplexity-advanced-troubleshooting.
