requesting-code-review
Dispatch code review subagents with focused context to catch issues before they compound.
java-junit
JUnit 5 best practices for standard and data-driven unit testing with practical patterns.
Full skill instructions
Your goal is to help me write effective unit tests with JUnit 5, covering both standard and data-driven testing approaches.
src/test/java.junit-jupiter-api, junit-jupiter-engine, and junit-jupiter-params for parameterized tests.mvn test or gradle test.Test suffix, e.g., CalculatorTest for a Calculator class.@Test for test methods.methodName_should_expectedBehavior_when_scenario.@BeforeEach and @AfterEach for per-test setup and teardown.@BeforeAll and @AfterAll for per-class setup and teardown (must be static methods).@DisplayName to provide a human-readable name for test classes and methods.@ParameterizedTest to mark a method as a parameterized test.@ValueSource for simple literal values (strings, ints, etc.).@MethodSource to refer to a factory method that provides test arguments as a Stream, Collection, etc.@CsvSource for inline comma-separated values.@CsvFileSource to use a CSV file from the classpath.@EnumSource to use enum constants.org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions (e.g., assertEquals, assertTrue, assertNotNull).assertThat(...).is...).assertThrows or assertDoesNotThrow to test for exceptions.assertAll to ensure all assertions are checked before the test fails.@Mock and @InjectMocks annotations from Mockito to simplify mock creation and injection.@Tag to categorize tests (e.g., @Tag("fast"), @Tag("integration")).@TestMethodOrder(MethodOrderer.OrderAnnotation.class) and @Order to control test execution order when strictly necessary.@Disabled to temporarily skip a test method or class, providing a reason.@Nested to group tests in a nested inner class for better organization and structure.Dispatch code review subagents with focused context to catch issues before they compound.
Evaluate code review feedback with technical rigor before implementing, avoiding performative agreement and blind implementation.
Isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification.
Structured workflow for completing development branches with test verification and merge/PR options.
review
Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.
Standardized git commits using Conventional Commits specification with intelligent diff analysis and message generation.
Structures git workflow practices. Use when making any code change. Use when committing, branching, resolving conflicts, or when you need to organize work across multiple parallel streams.
Code review focused exclusively on over-engineering. Finds what to delete: reinvented standard library, unneeded dependencies, speculative abstractions, dead flexibility. One line per finding: location, what to cut, what replaces it. Complements correctness-focused review, this one only hunts complexity.
Generate Excalidraw diagrams from natural language descriptions in multiple formats.
Whole-repo audit for over-engineering. Like ponytail-review, but scans the entire codebase instead of a diff: a ranked list of what to delete, simplify, or replace with stdlib/native equivalents. One-shot report, does not apply fixes.
Systematic code review practices for constructive feedback, bug detection, and team knowledge sharing.
Opus.ai: Revolutionize Your Web Experience
Build a no-code AI app in minutes.
An IDE for code migration from legacy to modern frameworks through coding agents.
Automate CGI animation in live-action scenes
Branded artistic QR-code concepts
Launch a website in seconds with AI.
Streamline Your Coding Experience with AI Code Helper
Convert any screenshot or design to clean code.