requesting-code-review
Dispatch code review subagents with focused context to catch issues before they compound.
conventional-commit
Structured prompt template for generating standardized conventional commit messages.
Full skill instructions
<description>This file contains a prompt template for generating conventional commit messages. It provides instructions, examples, and formatting guidelines to help users write standardized, descriptive commit messages in accordance with the Conventional Commits specification.</description>
Follow these steps:
git status to review changed files.git diff or git diff --cached to inspect changes.git add <file>.git commit -m "type(scope): description"
<commit-message>
<type>feat|fix|docs|style|refactor|perf|test|build|ci|chore|revert</type>
<scope>()</scope>
<description>A short, imperative summary of the change</description>
<body>(optional: more detailed explanation)</body>
<footer>(optional: e.g. BREAKING CHANGE: details, or issue references)</footer>
</commit-message>
<examples>
<example>feat(parser): add ability to parse arrays</example>
<example>fix(ui): correct button alignment</example>
<example>docs: update README with usage instructions</example>
<example>refactor: improve performance of data processing</example>
<example>chore: update dependencies</example>
<example>feat!: send email on registration (BREAKING CHANGE: email service required)</example>
</examples>
<validation>
<type>Must be one of the allowed types. See <reference>https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#specification</reference></type>
<scope>Optional, but recommended for clarity.</scope>
<description>Required. Use the imperative mood (e.g., "add", not "added").</description>
<body>Optional. Use for additional context.</body>
<footer>Use for breaking changes or issue references.</footer>
</validation>
<final-step>
<cmd>git commit -m "type(scope): description"</cmd>
<note>Replace with your constructed message. Include body and footer if needed.</note>
</final-step>
Dispatch code review subagents with focused context to catch issues before they compound.
Evaluate code review feedback with technical rigor before implementing, avoiding performative agreement and blind implementation.
Isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification.
Structured workflow for completing development branches with test verification and merge/PR options.
review
Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.
Standardized git commits using Conventional Commits specification with intelligent diff analysis and message generation.
Structures git workflow practices. Use when making any code change. Use when committing, branching, resolving conflicts, or when you need to organize work across multiple parallel streams.
Code review focused exclusively on over-engineering. Finds what to delete: reinvented standard library, unneeded dependencies, speculative abstractions, dead flexibility. One line per finding: location, what to cut, what replaces it. Complements correctness-focused review, this one only hunts complexity.
Generate Excalidraw diagrams from natural language descriptions in multiple formats.
Whole-repo audit for over-engineering. Like ponytail-review, but scans the entire codebase instead of a diff: a ranked list of what to delete, simplify, or replace with stdlib/native equivalents. One-shot report, does not apply fixes.
Systematic code review practices for constructive feedback, bug detection, and team knowledge sharing.
Opus.ai: Revolutionize Your Web Experience
Build a no-code AI app in minutes.
An IDE for code migration from legacy to modern frameworks through coding agents.
Automate CGI animation in live-action scenes
Branded artistic QR-code concepts
Launch a website in seconds with AI.
Streamline Your Coding Experience with AI Code Helper
Convert any screenshot or design to clean code.