Skip to content
conventional-commit logo

Conventional Commit

conventional-commit

Structured prompt template for generating standardized conventional commit messages.

SKILL.md

Full skill instructions

Instructions

	<description>This file contains a prompt template for generating conventional commit messages. It provides instructions, examples, and formatting guidelines to help users write standardized, descriptive commit messages in accordance with the Conventional Commits specification.</​description>

Workflow

Follow these steps:

  1. Run git status to review changed files.
  2. Run git diff or git diff --cached to inspect changes.
  3. Stage your changes with git add <file>.
  4. Construct your commit message using the following XML structure.
  5. After generating your commit message, Copilot will automatically run the following command in your integrated terminal (no confirmation needed):
git commit -m "type(scope): description"
  1. Just execute this prompt and Copilot will handle the commit for you in the terminal.

Commit Message Structure

<commit-message>
	<type>feat|fix|docs|style|refactor|perf|test|build|ci|chore|revert</​type>
	<scope>()</​scope>
	<description>A short, imperative summary of the change</​description>
	<body>(optional: more detailed explanation)</​body>
	<footer>(optional: e.g. BREAKING CHANGE: details, or issue references)</​footer>
</​commit-message>

Examples

<examples>
	<example>feat(parser): add ability to parse arrays</​example>
	<example>fix(ui): correct button alignment</​example>
	<example>docs: update README with usage instructions</​example>
	<example>refactor: improve performance of data processing</​example>
	<example>chore: update dependencies</​example>
	<example>feat!: send email on registration (BREAKING CHANGE: email service required)</​example>
</​examples>

Validation

<validation>
	<type>Must be one of the allowed types. See <reference>https://www.conventionalcommits.org/​en/​v1.0.0/#specification</​reference></​type>
	<scope>Optional, but recommended for clarity.</​scope>
	<description>Required. Use the imperative mood (e.g., "add", not "added").</​description>
	<body>Optional. Use for additional context.</​body>
	<footer>Use for breaking changes or issue references.</​footer>
</​validation>

Final Step

<final-step>
	<cmd>git commit -m "type(scope): description"</​cmd>
	<note>Replace with your constructed message. Include body and footer if needed.</​note>
</​final-step>

More Git & Pull Requests skills

requesting-code-review logo
Git & Pull Requests

requesting-code-review

Dispatch code review subagents with focused context to catch issues before they compound.

295.4K 245.8K
View
receiving-code-review logo
Git & Pull Requests

receiving-code-review

Evaluate code review feedback with technical rigor before implementing, avoiding performative agreement and blind implementation.

295.4K 208.8K
View
using-git-worktrees logo
Git & Pull Requests

using-git-worktrees

Isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification.

295.4K 205.2K
View

Structured workflow for completing development branches with test verification and merge/PR options.

295.4K 202.3K
View
review logo
Git & Pull Requests

review

review

276.6K 94.8K
View
code-review-and-quality logo
Git & Pull Requests

code-review-and-quality

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.

101.4K 55.6K
View
git-commit logo
Git & Pull Requests

git-commit

Standardized git commits using Conventional Commits specification with intelligent diff analysis and message generation.

39.7K 46.4K
View
git-workflow-and-versioning logo
Git & Pull Requests

git-workflow-and-versioning

Structures git workflow practices. Use when making any code change. Use when committing, branching, resolving conflicts, or when you need to organize work across multiple parallel streams.

101.4K 44.2K
View
ponytail-review logo
Git & Pull Requests

ponytail-review

Code review focused exclusively on over-engineering. Finds what to delete: reinvented standard library, unneeded dependencies, speculative abstractions, dead flexibility. One line per finding: location, what to cut, what replaces it. Complements correctness-focused review, this one only hunts complexity.

155.5K 32.1K
View
excalidraw-diagram-generator logo
Git & Pull Requests

excalidraw-diagram-generator

Generate Excalidraw diagrams from natural language descriptions in multiple formats.

39.7K 31.1K
View
ponytail-audit logo
Git & Pull Requests

ponytail-audit

Whole-repo audit for over-engineering. Like ponytail-review, but scans the entire codebase instead of a diff: a ranked list of what to delete, simplify, or replace with stdlib/native equivalents. One-shot report, does not apply fixes.

155.5K 30K
View
code-review-excellence logo
Git & Pull Requests

code-review-excellence

Systematic code review practices for constructive feedback, bug detection, and team knowledge sharing.

40.2K 29.4K
View

Coding & apps AI tools

Opus Clip logo
Coding & apps

Opus Clip

Opus.ai: Revolutionize Your Web Experience

Free
View
Imagica logo
Coding & apps

Imagica

Build a no-code AI app in minutes.

Freemium
View
E
Coding & apps

Emergent.sh

An IDE for code migration from legacy to modern frameworks through coding agents.

Freemium
View
Wonder Dynamics logo
Coding & apps

Wonder Dynamics

Automate CGI animation in live-action scenes

Paid
View
M
Coding & apps

Mixo

Launch a website in seconds with AI.

Paid
View
AI Code Convert logo
Coding & apps

AI Code Convert

Streamline Your Coding Experience with AI Code Helper

Free
View