Skip to content
ca-discovery-verification logo

California Discovery Verification

ca-discovery-verification

Drafts California Superior Court discovery verification pages under CCP §§ 2030.250 and 2031.250 with proper CCP § 2015.5 perjury declarations. Trigger when the user needs a verification page for interrogatory or inspection/RPD responses, mentions California discovery verification, party vs. atto...

CaseMark/skills0installs44starsOther

SKILL.md

Full skill instructions

California Discovery Verification

Produces correctly formatted CA verification pages with proper signer capacity, knowledge basis, and CCP § 2015.5 perjury declaration. Unverified responses are treated as no response — the responding party waives objections and faces motions to compel (Appleton v. Superior Court (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 632 [VERIFY]).

Quick Start

  1. Gather intake details (see Pre-Draft Intake)
  2. Select verification type by discovery device
  3. Select knowledge basis clause
  4. Draft verification from template
  5. Run quality audit
  6. Confirm alignment with user

Pre-Draft Intake

Gather before drafting (apply labeled defaults if user says "use defaults" or "just draft"):

FieldDetailsDefault
Discovery deviceInterrogatories (Form/​Special) or inspection demand/​RPDInterrogatory
Exact response titleMust match verbatim on verification—
Caption infoCourt name, case number, party names—
Responding party typeIndividual or entity (corp, LLC, partnership)Individual
Signer identityLegal name, title/​role, authority basis (entities)—
Knowledge basisPersonal knowledge only, or information and beliefInfo & belief
Execution detailsDate, city, state—

Do not draft verification for responses that have not been finalized.

Step 1: Select Verification Type

DeviceStatute
Interrogatories (Form/​Special)CCP § 2030.250
Inspection demand / RPDCCP § 2031.250
Federal courtStop — use FRCP 33/​34 + 28 U.S.C. § 1746 [VERIFY]

Step 2: Select Knowledge Basis

  • Personal knowledge only: "The matters stated in the foregoing responses are true of my own knowledge."
  • Information and belief (signer relied on records, employees, or collected info): "The matters stated in the foregoing responses are true of my own knowledge, except as to those matters stated on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe them to be true."

Step 3: Draft Verification

Individual Template

[CAPTION BLOCK]

VERIFICATION OF [PARTY NAME] TO [EXACT RESPONSE TITLE]

I am the [plaintiff/​defendant] in this action. I have read the foregoing responses and know the contents thereof.
[KNOWLEDGE BASIS CLAUSE]

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on [DATE], at [CITY], [STATE].

___________________________
[SIGNER NAME]
[Plaintiff/​Defendant]

Entity Template

[CAPTION BLOCK]

VERIFICATION OF [ENTITY NAME] TO [EXACT RESPONSE TITLE]

I am the [TITLE] of [ENTITY NAME], a party to this action, and am authorized to make this verification for and on its behalf. I have read the foregoing responses and know the contents thereof.
[KNOWLEDGE BASIS CLAUSE]
[OPTIONAL: "I am informed by the employees and records of [ENTITY NAME] regarding the matters stated."]

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on [DATE], at [CITY], [STATE].

[ENTITY NAME]
By: _______________________
    [SIGNER NAME]
    Its: [TITLE]

Templates apply to both interrogatory and inspection/​RPD verifications — select the matching type from Step 1.

Post-Draft Alignment

After delivering, confirm with the user:

  1. Verification title matches response document title exactly
  2. Signer has proper authority (especially for entities)
  3. Knowledge basis clause is appropriate
  4. Execution location is correct (out-of-state may need adjustment)

Quality Audit

Before finalizing, verify all of the following:

  • Verification title matches response title verbatim
  • Signer capacity stated; entity authorization language included
  • CCP § 2015.5 perjury language verbatim: "under the laws of the State of California"
  • Execution date and city/​state present
  • Signature block includes name and capacity
  • Objections not verified (attorney signs for objections)
  • Knowledge basis clause matches actual basis of responses
  • Federal court not using CCP form
  • No attorney signature where party signature required

Pitfalls

  • Title mismatch between verification and response invites motions to compel
  • Attorney-signed verifications invalid except narrow CCP § 446 circumstances [VERIFY]
  • "Personal knowledge" clause wrong if signer relied on records — use information-and-belief
  • Never verify legal objections — attorney signs the response document for those
  • Omitting "under the laws of the State of California" from perjury declaration is a fatal defect
  • No notarization unless court order or client policy requires it
  • Perjury exposure for false verifications (Cal. Penal Code § 118) [VERIFY]
  • All case citations must be verified or flagged [VERIFY] — do not invent case law
  • Attorney review required — all output must be reviewed by supervising counsel before signature or service