Skip to content
ada-accommodation-complaint logo

ADA Failure to Accommodate Complaint

ada-accommodation-complaint

Drafts an ADA failure-to-accommodate complaint for federal or state court filing. Covers Title I employment (42 U.S.C. § 12112) and Title III public accommodations (42 U.S.C. § 12182), including EEOC exhaustion, interactive process failures, and prayer for relief. Use when drafting an ADA complai...

CaseMark/skills0installs44starsOther

SKILL.md

Full skill instructions

ADA Failure to Accommodate Complaint

Generates a litigation-ready complaint under ADA Title I (employment) or Title III (public accommodations) for federal or state court. Determines applicable title from intake facts, structures numbered allegations to satisfy Twombly/​Iqbal plausibility, and produces a complete pleading with causes of action and prayer for relief.

Intake Checklist

Gather before drafting:

  • Plaintiff name, state of residence
  • Disability: diagnosis, functional limitations, treating provider
  • Accommodation request: date, form (oral/​written), recipient, specific accommodation, medical documentation submitted
  • Defendant response: denial letter, non-response timeline, or interactive process failure evidence
  • Title I only: job description, hire date, performance reviews, adverse action date/​reason
  • Title I only: EEOC charge number, filing date, Right to Sue date, receipt date
  • Damages: pay stubs, W-2s, benefits records, therapy/​treatment records

Complaint Structure

Draft the following sections in order:

1. Caption

Court name/​division; plaintiff as "an individual with a disability"; defendant by full legal name; title: COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT; case number placeholder.

2. Nature of Action

2–4 sentences: title invoked → plaintiff's disability and limitation → accommodation requested → defendant's refusal or process failure → resulting harm.

3. Parties

Plaintiff: Name; residence state; disability status under 42 U.S.C. § 12102 (impairment / record of / regarded as); relationship with defendant.

Defendant (Title I): Legal name; business form; principal place of business; 15+ employees for 20+ weeks in current or preceding calendar year.

Defendant (Title III): Legal name; owns/​leases/​operates place of public accommodation; category under § 12181(7).

4. Jurisdiction and Venue

BasisCitation
Federal question28 U.S.C. § 1331
Title I42 U.S.C. § 12117(a)
Title III42 U.S.C. § 12188
Supplemental state claims28 U.S.C. § 1367(a)
Venue28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)

EEOC exhaustion (Title I — mandatory):

  • Charge filed within 300 days (deferral state) or 180 days (non-deferral)
  • Complaint filed within 90 days of Right to Sue receipt per § 2000e-5(f)(1)
  • Attach Right to Sue letter as Exhibit A

5. Factual Allegations

Numbered paragraphs, chronological:

  1. Disability — impairment; how it substantially limits a major life activity per ADAAA; documentation provided to defendant
  2. Qualification — position, essential functions, performance history establishing "otherwise qualified"
  3. Accommodation request — date, form, recipient, content; medical documentation submitted
  4. Interactive process failure — no meeting, no questions about limitations, no alternatives proposed, no good-faith engagement
  5. Denial and rebuttal — defendant's reason(s) and rebuttal:
    • Undue hardship: low cost vs. resources; tax credits; minimal operational impact (§ 12111(10)(B))
    • Not qualified: performance record; prior success with informal accommodation
    • Fundamental alteration: modification does not alter core service/​function
  6. Adverse action — date, type (termination/​demotion/​denial of access/​constructive discharge), stated reason
  7. Damages — lost wages, benefits, out-of-pocket costs, emotional distress with treatment records
  8. Malice/​reckless indifference (if punitive damages sought) — pattern of discrimination, ignored counsel advice, animus statements

6. Causes of Action

Count I — Failure to Accommodate (Title I), § 12112(a), (b)(5)(A):

  • Plaintiff has a disability (§ 12102)
  • Plaintiff is otherwise qualified with or without accommodation
  • Defendant had notice of disability and accommodation need
  • Plaintiff requested a specific reasonable accommodation
  • Defendant failed to accommodate or engage in good-faith interactive process
  • Plaintiff suffered damages as proximate result

Count I alt — Denial of Equal Enjoyment (Title III), § 12182(a), (b)(2)(A)(ii):

  • Plaintiff has a disability
  • Defendant owns/​operates a place of public accommodation
  • Plaintiff requested reasonable policy/​practice modification
  • Modification would not fundamentally alter goods or services
  • Defendant refused, denying full and equal access

Count II — Retaliation (if applicable), § 12203(a):

  • Protected activity (accommodation request or opposition to discrimination)
  • Adverse action by defendant
  • Causal nexus

Count III — State disability discrimination (supplemental; cite applicable state statute)

7. Prayer for Relief

Title I: Reinstatement or front pay; back pay with prejudgment interest; compensatory damages (emotional distress); punitive damages if malice/​reckless indifference shown; attorney's fees and costs (§ 12205); pre/​post-judgment interest.

Title III (injunctive-focused): Permanent injunction requiring modification and ADA compliance; declaratory judgment; attorney's fees and costs (§ 12205).

Omit specific dollar amounts per FRCP 8(a)(3).

8. Jury Demand

"Plaintiff demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable." (FRCP 38(b))

Title III claims are equitable — no jury right. Limit or omit accordingly.

9. Signature Block

Per FRCP 11: date, attorney signature, name, bar number, state, firm, address, phone, email — "Attorney for Plaintiff." Add client verification if required by local rule.

Pitfalls and Checks

  • ADAAA breadth: Construe "substantially limits" broadly; never concede a narrow disability definition
  • Interactive process: Defendant's failure to engage creates independent liability even if plaintiff's preferred accommodation is unreasonable — plead separately. [VERIFY: circuit split on whether failure alone is actionable]
  • Title I damages cap: Compensatory + punitive capped at $50K–$300K by employer size (§ 1981a(b)(3)); back pay excluded from cap
  • State claims: FEHA, NYSHRL, and analogs provide broader coverage and uncapped damages — always plead supplemental state claims
  • Twombly/​Iqbal: Every element needs specific factual allegations raising plausibility; no conclusory recitations
  • Medical privacy: Include only detail necessary to establish substantial limitation; avoid gratuitous medical disclosure
  • Dual filing (Title I): Verify EEOC charge was dual-filed with state agency in deferral states to preserve state law claims

More Other skills

Delegate independent tasks to specialized agents working concurrently with isolated context.

295.4K 206.3K
View

Applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography to any sort of artifact that may benefit from having Anthropic's look-and-feel. Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply.

179.7K 100.1K
View

Toolkit for styling artifacts with a theme. These artifacts can be slides, docs, reportings, HTML landing pages, etc. There are 10 pre-set themes with colors/fonts that you can apply to any artifact that has been creating, or can generate a new theme on-the-fly.

179.7K 89.5K
View

A set of resources to help me write all kinds of internal communications, using the formats that my company likes to use. Claude should use this skill whenever asked to write some sort of internal communications (status reports, leadership updates, 3P updates, company newsletters, FAQs, incident reports, project updates, etc.).

179.7K 76.1K
View

Fundamental design principles for writing maintainable, testable Python code.

40.2K 21.9K
View

Modern responsive layouts using container queries, fluid typography, CSS Grid, and mobile-first strategies.

40.2K 20K
View

Generate Playwright tests from scenarios using interactive browser exploration and validation.

39.7K 18.2K
View

Modern React state management with Redux Toolkit, Zustand, Jotai, and React Query for every state category.

40.2K 14.7K
View

GDPR-compliant data handling with consent management, data subject rights, and privacy controls.

40.2K 14.3K
View

Python error handling patterns including input validation, exception hierarchies, and partial failure handling. Use when implementing validation logic, designing exception strategies, handling batch processing failures, or building robust APIs.

40.2K 13.5K
View

Detailed multi-file refactor planning with safety checks and rollback guidance.

39.7K 13K
View