Skip to content
m04-zero-cost logo

Zero-Cost Abstraction

m04-zero-cost

CRITICAL: Use for generics, traits, zero-cost abstraction. Triggers: E0277, E0308, E0599, generic, trait, impl, dyn, where, monomorphization, static dispatch, dynamic dispatch, impl Trait, trait bound not satisfied, 泛型, 特征, 零成本抽象, 单态化

SKILL.md

Full skill instructions

Zero-Cost Abstraction

Layer 1: Language Mechanics

Core Question

Do we need compile-time or runtime polymorphism?

Before choosing between generics and trait objects:

  • Is the type known at compile time?
  • Is a heterogeneous collection needed?
  • What's the performance priority?

Error → Design Question

ErrorDon't Just SayAsk Instead
E0277"Add trait bound"Is this abstraction at the right level?
E0308"Fix the type"Should types be unified or distinct?
E0599"Import the trait"Is the trait the right abstraction?
E0038"Make object-safe"Do we really need dynamic dispatch?

Thinking Prompt

Before adding trait bounds:

  1. What abstraction is needed?

    • Same behavior, different types → trait
    • Different behavior, same type → enum
    • No abstraction needed → concrete type
  2. When is type known?

    • Compile time → generics (static dispatch)
    • Runtime → trait objects (dynamic dispatch)
  3. What's the trade-off priority?

    • Performance → generics
    • Compile time → trait objects
    • Flexibility → depends

Trace Up ↑

When type system fights back:

E0277 (trait bound not satisfied)
    ↑ Ask: Is the abstraction level correct?
    ↑ Check: m09-domain (what behavior is being abstracted?)
    ↑ Check: m05-type-driven (should use newtype?)
Persistent ErrorTrace ToQuestion
Complex trait boundsm09-domainIs the abstraction right?
Object safety issuesm05-type-drivenCan typestate help?
Type explosionm10-performanceAccept dyn overhead?

Trace Down ↓

From design to implementation:

"Need to abstract over types with same behavior"
    ↓ Types known at compile time → impl Trait or generics
    ↓ Types determined at runtime → dyn Trait

"Need collection of different types"
    ↓ Closed set → enum
    ↓ Open set → Vec<Box<dyn Trait>>

"Need to return different types"
    ↓ Same type → impl Trait
    ↓ Different types → Box<dyn Trait>

Quick Reference

PatternDispatchCode SizeRuntime Cost
fn foo<T: Trait>()Static+bloatZero
fn foo(x: &dyn Trait)DynamicMinimalvtable lookup
impl Trait returnStatic+bloatZero
Box<dyn Trait>DynamicMinimalAllocation + vtable

Syntax Comparison

// Static dispatch - type known at compile time
fn process(x: impl Display) { }      // argument position
fn process<T: Display>(x: T) { }     // explicit generic
fn get() -> impl Display { }         // return position

// Dynamic dispatch - type determined at runtime
fn process(x: &dyn Display) { }      // reference
fn process(x: Box<dyn Display>) { }  // owned

Error Code Reference

ErrorCauseQuick Fix
E0277Type doesn't impl traitAdd impl or change bound
E0308Type mismatchCheck generic params
E0599No method foundImport trait with use
E0038Trait not object-safeUse generics or redesign

Decision Guide

ScenarioChooseWhy
Performance criticalGenericsZero runtime cost
Heterogeneous collectiondyn TraitDifferent types at runtime
Plugin architecturedyn TraitUnknown types at compile
Reduce compile timedyn TraitLess monomorphization
Small, known type setenumNo indirection

Object Safety

A trait is object-safe if it:

  • Doesn't have Self: Sized bound
  • Doesn't return Self
  • Doesn't have generic methods
  • Uses where Self: Sized for non-object-safe methods

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy BadBetter
Over-generic everythingCompile time, complexityConcrete types when possible
dyn for known typesUnnecessary indirectionGenerics
Complex trait hierarchiesHard to understandSimpler design
Ignore object safetyLimits flexibilityPlan for dyn if needed

Related Skills

WhenSee
Type-driven designm05-type-driven
Domain abstractionm09-domain
Performance concernsm10-performance
Send/​Sync boundsm07-concurrency

More Other skills

Delegate independent tasks to specialized agents working concurrently with isolated context.

295.4K 206.3K
View

Applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography to any sort of artifact that may benefit from having Anthropic's look-and-feel. Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply.

179.7K 100.1K
View

Toolkit for styling artifacts with a theme. These artifacts can be slides, docs, reportings, HTML landing pages, etc. There are 10 pre-set themes with colors/fonts that you can apply to any artifact that has been creating, or can generate a new theme on-the-fly.

179.7K 89.5K
View

A set of resources to help me write all kinds of internal communications, using the formats that my company likes to use. Claude should use this skill whenever asked to write some sort of internal communications (status reports, leadership updates, 3P updates, company newsletters, FAQs, incident reports, project updates, etc.).

179.7K 76.1K
View

Fundamental design principles for writing maintainable, testable Python code.

40.2K 21.9K
View

Modern responsive layouts using container queries, fluid typography, CSS Grid, and mobile-first strategies.

40.2K 20K
View

Generate Playwright tests from scenarios using interactive browser exploration and validation.

39.7K 18.2K
View

Modern React state management with Redux Toolkit, Zustand, Jotai, and React Query for every state category.

40.2K 14.7K
View

GDPR-compliant data handling with consent management, data subject rights, and privacy controls.

40.2K 14.3K
View

Python error handling patterns including input validation, exception hierarchies, and partial failure handling. Use when implementing validation logic, designing exception strategies, handling batch processing failures, or building robust APIs.

40.2K 13.5K
View

Detailed multi-file refactor planning with safety checks and rollback guidance.

39.7K 13K
View