Downloads · 30 days
30
11% of all-time downloads
yasserrmd/LFM2-350M-Extract-TOON
LFM2-350M-Extract-TOON is a text generation model from yasserrmd. Use it when you need the model to write or continue text. It is set up for transformers. The card lists the license as apache-2.0.
Downloads · 30 days
30
11% of all-time downloads
All-time downloads
261
Public
Parameters
354M
1.4 GB on disk
Likes
6
Public
Click a slice to open those files.
.safetensors1.4 GB · 100%
From the Hugging Face model README
yasserrmd/LFM2-350M-Extract-TOON is a fine-tuned variant of LiquidAI’s LFM2-350M-Extract, built using the Unsloth AI framework and the dataset yasserrmd/TOON-Unstructured-Structured.
This model specializes in schema-driven conversion of natural-language text into valid TOON (Token-Oriented Object Notation) format — a compact, token-efficient alternative to JSON designed for large language models.
| Property | Description |
|---|---|
| Base Model | LiquidAI/LFM2-350M-Extract |
| Architecture | LFM2-350M (Decoder-only Transformer) |
| Fine-tuning Method | LoRA (via Unsloth AI) |
| Objective | Structured extraction in TOON format |
| Dataset | yasserrmd/TOON-Unstructured-Structured |
| Languages | English |
| Frameworks | Transformers, Unsloth, PyTorch |
| License | LFM License v1.0 |
| Final Loss | 0.2178 (Step 430) |
TOON (Token-Oriented Object Notation) is a serialization format optimized for LLMs.
It represents structured data with minimal tokens using a header + rows pattern:
users[2]{id,name,role}:
1,Alice,admin
2,Bob,user
Compared to JSON, TOON reduces token count by up to 60% and is easier for LLMs to generate deterministically.
The model was trained on 430 steps with the following key trends:
The training demonstrated strong stability and smooth convergence towards sub-0.25 loss, confirming excellent adaptation of the base model to TOON structure.
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM
from transformers import TextStreamer
model_id = "yasserrmd/LFM2-350M-Extract-TOON"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id, torch_dtype="auto", device_map="auto")
schema = """
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
type: object
properties:
id:
type: string
pattern: "^(\\d+\\.\\d+) disturbing$"
description: Dot-separated integers representing the unique ID of each element in the hierarchy
title:
type: string
description: Descriptive title of the section or element
level:
type: integer
minimum: 0
maximum: 9
description: "Hierarchical level (0 - ROOT, 1 - SECTION, 2 - SUBSECTION, 3+ - DETAIL_N)"
level_type:
type: string
enum[4]: ROOT,SECTION,SUBSECTION,DETAIL_N
description: Type of the hierarchical element
component:
type: array
items:
type: object
properties:
idc:
type: integer
description: Component ID
component_type:
type: string
enum[4]: PARAGRAPH,TABLE,CALCULATION,CHECKBOX
description: Type of component
metadata:
type: string
description: "Additional metadata (e.g., title, note, or overview)"
properties:
type: object
properties:
variables:
type: array
items:
type: object
properties:
idx:
type: string
description: Unique row-column identifier (X.Y format)
name:
type: string
description: Attribute name
value:
type: string
description: Attribute value
unit:
type[2]: string,"null"
description: Optional unit for the value
metrics:
type: boolean
description: Boolean flag indicating if the attribute is a metric
formula:
type: boolean
description: Boolean flag indicating if the attribute is a formula
content:
type: array
items:
type[2]: string,"null"
description: Text content
children:
type: array
items:
"$ref": #
required[6]: id,title,level,level_type,component,children
"""
text = """
SUBSECTION component[1]: - idc: 1 component_type: PARAGRAPH metadata: "<note>Note: Specific to debtor risk.</note>" properties: variables[0]: content[1]: The risk of debtors failing to make payments on time. - id: "2.2" title: Liquidity Risk level: 2 level_type: SUBSECTION component[1]: - idc: 1 component_type: PARAGRAPH metadata: "<note>Note: Specific to liquidity risk.</note>" properties: variables[0]: content[1]: Liquidity risk is related to the difficulty in selling assets quickly without a significant loss.
The document begins with an inclusive overview, elucidating the purpose of the report and its objective to assess risks and propose mitigations for financial operations, such as compliance, fraud detection, and performance metrics. The overall framework is meticulously divided into several sections and subsections reflecting detailed and structured analysis.
This report is intended to provide a comprehensive understanding of risk exposure within financial operations. We will now delve into the first section of the report, which covers a vast array of compliance regulations critical for maintaining financial accountability.
Firstly, let’s examine the **Compliance Section**. The section’s primary aim is to highlight the key compliance regulations applicable to financial operations. Notably, this includes the **Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Regulation (RC.1)** and the **Data Privacy Act (RC.2)**. Highlighting the significance of these regulations, the Subsection on Anti-Money Laundering identifies several gaps within the current system. These gaps need to be addressed to ensure robust compliance. The analysis suggests the presence of several risk points where the current practices might fall short of regulatory standards.
Next, we have a **Detailed Risk Analysis** for the Anti-Money Laundering Regulation. This component outlines the specific risks and potential impacts on financial operations. In the document, a table detailing the risk assessment is provided outlining two primary risks, **Fraudulent Transactions (RA.1)**, and **Non-Compliance with AML (RA.2)**, each with a brief description of the risk and its possible consequences. Addressing these risks requires a systematic approach, ensuring all preventive measures are in place to mitigate financial risks effectively.
Moreover, a **Checklist** is included to assess the current status concerning the Anti-Money Laundering Regulation. The Checklist requires the selection of the best option that describes the current status as either **Option 1 (true)** or **Option 2 (false)**. This selection is pivotal in making informed decisions about regulatory compliance and operational adjustments.
In parallel, the **Data Privacy Act** (RC.2) Subsection identifies several issues in handling personal data. These issues need to be corrected to fully comply with the Data Privacy Act. The **Fraud Detection Section** and its **Subsections on Misrepresentation and Theft of Data** follow a similar structure, detailing the critical risks associated with these vulnerabilities and emphasizing the necessity for mitigation strategies.
In the **Fraud Detection Section**, we have a table outlining two major cases of fraud: **Misrepresentation (FC.1)** and **Theft of Data (FC.2)**. These cases are significant due to their impact on financial integrity and operational continuity. The analysis of these cases includes detailed descriptions of the nature and extent of the fraud, highlighting the importance of robust fraud detection mechanisms.
Each regulatory and fraud-related section is equipped with thorough analysis and checks, ensuring that every risk is identified and addressed. While the sections provide detailed tables and checklists, they also reflect the broader context of financial operations and the mitigation strategies required to ensure compliance and prevent fraud.
By providing these detailed sections and sub-sections, the report aims to equip stakeholders with the necessary information to assess and improve the risk management framework. This ensures that all financial operations are conducted in a compliant, transparent, and secure manner, thereby safeguarding the interests of all stakeholders involved.
"""
system_instruction = (
"You are an intelligent model specialized in converting natural language text"
"into valid TOON (Token-Oriented Object Notation) format. "
"Always follow the given schema strictly, emit the correct header "
"in the form <label>[1]{fields}: followed by exactly one values row. "
"Do not include explanations or additional commentary."
)
user_prompt = (
f'Generate TOON format using the schema {schema} '
f'for the below text "{text}".'
)
messages = [
{"role": "system", "content": system_instruction},
{"role": "user", "content": user_prompt}
]
inputs = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(
messages,
add_generation_prompt = True, # Must add for generation
return_tensors = "pt",
tokenize = True,
return_dict = True,
).to("cuda")
_ = model.generate(
**inputs,
max_new_tokens = 2046, # Increase for longer outputs!
# Recommended Liquid settings!
temperature = 0.3, min_p = 0.15, repetition_penalty = 1.05,
streamer = TextStreamer(tokenizer, skip_prompt = True),
)
Expected Output:
id: "0.0"
title: Financial Risk Assessment Report
level: 0
description: Overview of financial risks and mitigation strategies.
level_type: ROOT
component[1]:
- idc: 1
component_type: PARAGRAPH
metadata: <note>Note: Specific to debtor risk.</note>"
properties:
variables[0]:
content[1]: The risk of debtors failing to make payments on time.
children[1]:
- id: "1.0"
title: Compliance Section
level: 1
level_type: SECTION
component[1]:
- idc: 1
component_type: PARAGRAPH
metadata: <note>Note: Specific to liquidity risk.</note>"
properties:
variables[0]:
content[1]: The risk of liquidity risk is related to the difficulty in selling assets quickly without a significant loss.
children[1]:
- id: "1.1"
title: Detailed Risk Analysis
level: 2
level_type: SUBSECTION
component[1]:
- idc: 1
component_type: TABLE
metadata: <note>Table of Risks</note>"
properties:
variables[2]{idx,name,value,unit,metrics}:
"0.0",Risk Assessment,false,null,false
"0.1",Risks,Fraudulent Transactions,null,false
content[1]: Fraudulent Transactions (RA.1), Non-Compliance with AML,null,false
- idc: 2
component_type: CHECKBOX
metadata: <note>Checklist for compliance</note>
properties:
variables[0]:
content[1]: Option 1 (true),Option 2 (false)<|im_end|>
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Final Training Loss | 0.2178 |
| Lowest Loss | 0.2043 |
| Total Steps | 430 |
| Stability | Excellent (no divergence) |
[n]) TOON conversions.@misc{yasserrmd2025lfm2toon,
title = {LFM2-350M-Extract-TOON: Schema-driven TOON Output Model},
author = {Mohamed Yasser},
year = {2025},
howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/yasserrmd/LFM2-350M-Extract-TOON}}
}
| Version | Date | Changes |
|---|---|---|
| v1.0 | 2025-11-11 | Initial release (Unsloth LoRA fine-tune) |
| v1.1 | TBD | Planned quantized GGUF release |
Model performance summary: The model successfully converged from 1.37 → 0.21 loss over 430 steps, showing a 6× reduction in training loss. It produces deterministic, schema-accurate TOON outputs under the specified system instruction, making it an efficient structured extraction model for lightweight and edge deployments.