MATPO-14b

<div align="center">

MATPO: Multi-Agent Tool-Integrated Policy Optimization

Train Multiple Agent Roles Within a Single LLM via Reinforcement Learning.

<!-- [](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.04678) [](LICENSE) [](https://www.python.org/downloads/) [](https://github.com/mzf666/MATPO) --> <!-- <hr> --> <div align="center">

</div> </div> <div align="center"> <table> <tr> <td align="center"> <img src="assets/main_gaia.png" width="220px" alt="GAIA Results"><br> <em>GAIA Results</em> </td> <td align="center"> <img src="assets/main_frameqa.png" width="220px" alt="FRAMES Results"><br> <em>FRAMES Results</em> </td> <td align="center"> <img src="assets/main_webwalkerqa.png" width="220px" alt="WebWalkerQA Results"><br> <em>WebWalkerQA Results</em> </td> </tr> </table> </div> <p align="center"> <img src="assets/multi_agent_framework.png" width="500px" alt="MATPO Framework"> </p> <p align="center"> <em>MATPO allows planner and worker agents to coexist within a single LLM and be trained via RL, achieving an 18.38% relative improvement over single-agent baselines on GAIA-text, FRAMES, and WebWalker-QA.</em> </p>

News & Updates

• [2025-Oct-08] MATPO-Qwen3-14B checkpoints and rollouts released
• [2025-Oct-08] Code and training scripts released
• [2025-Oct-06] Arxiv Paper released

Overview

MATPO (Multi-Agent Tool-Integrated Policy Optimization) is a novel reinforcement learning framework that enables training multiple specialized agent roles (planner and worker agents) within a single large language model.

The Problem

Current single-agent approaches for multi-turn tool-integrated planning face critical limitations:

• Context Length Bottleneck: Tool responses (e.g., web scraping) consume excessive tokens, making long-range planning prohibitive
• Noisy Tool Responses: Raw tool responses interfere with the model's attention and planning capabilities

Our Solution

MATPO introduces a multi-agent-in-one-model architecture where:

• A planner-agent orchestrates high-level planning and delegates subtasks
• Worker-agents handle specific browsing and search tasks with isolated contexts
• Both roles are trained within a single LLM using role-specific prompts via reinforcement learning

Key Features

• Multi-Agent-in-One-Model: Train planner and worker agents within a single LLM using role-specific system prompts
• Principled Credit Assignment: Extends GRPO with theoretically grounded reward distribution across planner and worker rollouts
• Easy Integration: Built on top of veRL, compatible with existing RL training frameworks
• Robust Training: More stable learning curves compared to single-agent approaches, especially with noisy tool responses
• Infrastructure Efficient: No need for deployment of separate models or additional rollout engines

MATPO Architecture

MATPO employs a hierarchical multi-agent framework where a single LLM serves multiple roles:

User Query → Planner Agent → Subtask 1 → Worker Agent → Result 1
                           → Subtask 2 → Worker Agent → Result 2
                           → ...
                           → Final Answer

<p align="center"> <img src="assets/single_agent.png" width="600px" alt="Single-agent GRPO Framework"> <img src="assets/multi_agent_RL_rollout.png" width="600px" alt="MATPO Framework"> </p> <p align="center"> <em>Comparison between the rollout trajectories between the single-agent GRPO (top) and the multi-agent MATPO (bottom).</em> </p>

Multi-Agent Rollout Process

1. Planner Agent:

   • Receives user query with planner-specific system prompt
   • Generates high-level plan and decomposes it into subtasks
   • Delegates subtasks to worker agents
   • Synthesizes worker responses into final answer

2. Worker Agent:

   • Receives subtask with worker-specific system prompt
   • Performs multi-turn tool-integrated planning (search, scrape, analyze)
   • Returns summarized result to planner
   • Maintains isolated context to prevent token overflow

3. Credit Assignment:

   • Final answer accuracy determines the reward
   • Reward is normalized across all planner-worker rollout groups
   • Gradient flows to both planner actions and worker actions proportionally

<p align="center"> <img src="assets/multi-agent-grpo-implementation.png" width="600px" alt="MATPO Framework"> </p> <p align="center"> <em>Visualization of MATPO implementation.</em> </p>

Quick Start

Prerequisites:

• Python 3.10 or higher
• CUDA 12.4+ (for GPU support)
• 16 x (8 x 80G-A800) GPUs (for training with Qwen3-14B-base)

Clone the repository.

git clone https://github.com/mzf666/MATPO.git
cd MATPO

For prerequisites installation (CUDA, cuDNN, Apex), we recommend following the verl prerequisites guide which provides detailed instructions for:

• CUDA: Version >= 12.4
• cuDNN: Version >= 9.8.0
• Apex

Setup environment and install dependencies.

conda create -n matpo python==3.10 -y
conda activate matpo
bash examples/sglang_multiturn/install.sh

Setup Node.js for Serper API support.

MCP (Model Context Protocol) requires Node.js to run MCP servers. Node.js version 18+ is recommended for optimal compatibility with MCP tools.

target_path=YOUR_TARGET_PATH

# Download Node.js binary (example for Linux x64)
wget https://nodejs.org/dist/v24.2.0/node-v24.2.0-linux-x64.tar.xz

# Extract to your target path
tar -xf node-v24.2.0-linux-x64.tar.xz -C $target_path

# Add to PATH
export NODEJS_HOME=$target_path/node-v24.2.0-linux-x64
export PATH=$NODEJS_HOME/bin:$PATH
export NODE_SHARED=$target_path/node-shared/node_modules
export PATH=$NODE_SHARED/.bin:$PATH

# Verify installation
node --version
npm --version

# Install serper mcp server
mkdir -p $target_path/node-shared
cd $target_path/node-shared
npm init -y
npm install serper-search-scrape-mcp-server

Configure the Node.js paths and HTTP / HTTPS proxies (if necessary) in the examples/sglang_multiturn/launch.sh script properly.

Download the training and testing datasets to the data directory. The prerpocessed datasets can be downloaded here.

Train a Qwen3-14B-base model with MATPO on the MuSiQue dataset and evaluate on the GAIA-text datasets:

# tested on 16 x (8 x 80G-A800) nodes

export SERPER_API_KEY="YOUR_SERPER_API_KEY" && \
export OPENAI_API_KEY="YOUR_OPENAI_API_KEY" && \
export WANDB_API_KEY="YOUR_WANDB_API_KEY" && \
export SINGLENODE=true && \
export RAY_DEBUG=legacy && \
export HYDRA_FULL_ERROR=1 && \
source YOUR_CONDA_PATH activate matpo && \
cd YOUR_PROJECT_PATH && \
bash examples/sglang_multiturn/launch.sh \
    examples/sglang_multiturn/qwen3-14b_musique_MATPO.sh

Experiments and Results

Main Results

MATPO consistently outperforms single-agent GRPO baselines across all benchmarks:

Training Configuration

• Base Model: Qwen3-14B-base
• Training Dataset: Filtered MuSiQue dataset.
• Training Steps: 180 steps
• Rollouts per Query: 8 (for group normalization)
• Reward Function: 0.9 × accuracy + 0.1 × tool_format_reward

Model Checkpoints and Rollouts

We release the trained Qwen3-14B-base model checkpoints at the 180th training step of both single-agent GRPO and MATPO.

The associated model rollouts across various training steps can be found here.

Key Findings

• More Stable Training: MATPO exhibits more stable learning curves and avoids catastrophic performance drops observed in single-agent training

• Robustness to Noise: Multi-agent decomposition effectively isolates noisy tool responses, preventing them from interfering with high-level planning

• Better Credit Assignment: Principled reward distribution across planner and worker rollouts leads to more effective learning

Practical Implementation Tips

Based on our experiments, we recommend:

• Final Summary: Final summaries from worker agents are critical for clean planner-worker interfaces
• Query Recap: Recapping original user query in worker prompt significantly improves performance
• URL Blocking: Remember to blocking HuggingFace search results to avoid data leakage

Citation

If you find MATPO helpful in your research, please consider citing our paper:

@misc{mo2025multiagenttoolintegratedpolicyoptimization,
      title={Multi-Agent Tool-Integrated Policy Optimization}, 
      author={Zhanfeng Mo and Xingxuan Li and Yuntao Chen and Lidong Bing},
      year={2025},
      eprint={2510.04678},
      archivePrefix={arXiv},
      primaryClass={cs.CL},
      url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04678}, 
}

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank:

• VolcEngine for developing and open-sourcing veRL, the RL training framework that powers MATPO
• Alibaba Cloud for the Qwen3 model series
• Google for the Serper API that enables web search capabilities
• The authors of GAIA, WebWalkerQA, FRAMES, and MuSiQue datasets
• The open-source community for valuable feedback and contributions

FAQ

<details> <summary><b>Q: What's the difference between MATPO and traditional multi-agent systems?</b></summary>

MATPO uses a single LLM to play multiple agent roles via different system prompts, rather than deploying separate models. This offers:

• Lower infrastructure complexity
• Better parameter efficiency
• Easier deployment and maintenance
• Compatible with existing RL frameworks

</details> <details> <summary><b>Q: Can I use MATPO with models other than Qwen3?</b></summary>

Yes! MATPO is model-agnostic. You can use any decoder-only LLM that supports tool calling and multi-turn conversations. We've tested with Qwen3-14B-base, but models like Llama 3, Mistral, or other reasoning-capable LLMs should work.

</details> <details> <summary><b>Q: How many GPUs do I need for training?</b></summary>

For Qwen3-14B-base, we recommend:

• Training: 8x A100/A800 GPUs (80GB)
• Inference: 1-2x A100/A800 GPUs (40GB/80GB)

</details> <details> <summary><b>Q: How does MATPO handle credit assignment?</b></summary>

MATPO extends GRPO with principled credit assignment:

1. The planner's final answer determines the accuracy reward
2. This reward is normalized across all rollouts in a group
3. Gradients flow proportionally to both planner and worker actions
4. Worker agents receive the same advantage value as their parent planner rollout

See our paper for more details.

</details> <details> <summary><b>Q: Can I use MATPO for tasks other than web search?</b></summary>

Absolutely! While our paper focuses on web search, MATPO's framework is general. You can extend it to:

• Code generation with execution feedback
• Scientific reasoning with calculator tools
• Data analysis with pandas/SQL tools
• Any multi-turn task with verifiable rewards

</details> <details> <summary><b>Q: How stable is MATPO training compared to single-agent RL?</b></summary>

MATPO is significantly more stable. Our experiments show:

• Single-agent GRPO often suffers catastrophic drops after step 120
• MATPO maintains steady improvement throughout training
• Multi-agent structure isolates noisy tool responses, preventing interference

See Figure 4 in our paper for training curves.

</details> <details> <summary><b>Q: Do I need to block HuggingFace URLs during training?</b></summary>

For research integrity, yes - especially if your evaluation benchmarks are hosted on HuggingFace. This prevents models from "cheating" by finding ground-truth answers online.

For production systems with no data leakage concerns, this is optional.

</details>

---

<p align="center"> <strong>Star ⭐ this repository if you find it helpful!</strong> </p>