Downloads · 30 days
0
sweelol/gemma3-270m-pruned-baseline-50pc
gemma3-270m-pruned-baseline-50pc is a text generation model from sweelol. Use it when you need the model to write or continue text. It is set up for transformers. The card lists the license as gemma.
This model is part of the Sweelol AI Hub collection, resulting from experiments in efficient fine-tuning and knowledge distillation on the Gemma-3-270m architecture using the Databricks Dolly-15k dataset on Kaggle TPU…
Downloads · 30 days
0
Access
Public
Updated Aug 26, 2025
Repo size
—
Likes
0
Public
Click a slice to open those files.
.md23.3 KB · 94%
From the Hugging Face model README
This model is part of the Sweelol AI Hub collection, resulting from experiments in efficient fine-tuning and knowledge distillation on the Gemma-3-270m architecture using the Databricks Dolly-15k dataset on Kaggle TPUs/GPUs.
Key Details:
google/gemma-3-270msweelol/gemma3-270m-prunedThis model is part of the Sweelol AI Hub collection, resulting from experiments in efficient fine-tuning and knowledge distillation on the Gemma-3-270m architecture using the Databricks Dolly-15k dataset on Kaggle TPUs/GPUs.
Full Research Notebook & Benchmark Results: [Coming soon]
This is a pruned baseline version of the google/gemma-3-270m model. It was created by applying magnitude-based pruning to remove 50% of the model's weights. Crucially, this specific variant was not subsequently fine-tuned on a specific task or distilled. It represents the pruned model architecture before any task-specific adaptation.
Swee.LOL aiSwee.LOL aiCausal Language Model (Pruned)EnglishApache-2.0google/gemma-3-270mThis model can be used for general text generation tasks. It is intended for research and experimentation, particularly in the areas of model compression and the impact of pruning on model performance.
This model is ideally suited as a starting point for further experimentation, such as:
This model is not intended for production deployment without further fine-tuning. It should not be used for generating content that requires high factual accuracy, safety, or alignment with specific ethical guidelines, as it has not been specifically aligned for these purposes.
google/gemma-3-270m model and the databricks/databricks-dolly-15k dataset.Users should be aware that while this model performed surprisingly well on MMLU benchmarks in our experiments, it is a research artifact. It should be evaluated thoroughly on any target task before deployment. The trade-off between model size/efficiency and general capability should be carefully considered.
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "sweelol/gemma3-270m-pruned"
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id, torch_dtype="auto")
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
prompt = "Explain the concept of model pruning."
inputs = tokenizer(prompt, return_tensors="pt")
# Generate
generate_ids = model.generate(inputs.input_ids, max_length=30)
result = tokenizer.batch_decode(generate_ids, skip_special_tokens=True, clean_up_tokenization_spaces=False)[0]
print(result).
The databricks/databricks-dolly-15k dataset was used to score the importance of weights in the google/gemma-3-270m model to determine which ones to prune. This specific version was not trained on additional data after pruning.
The model was evaluated on a comprehensive suite of tasks from the lm-evaluation-harness, including 5 diverse subsets of MMLU (for academic reasoning) and HellaSwag (for common-sense reasoning). The primary metric is zero-shot accuracy on a 200-sample subset of each task's test split.
The model was evaluated on a comprehensive suite of tasks from the lm-evaluation-harness, including 5 diverse subsets of MMLU (for academic reasoning) and HellaSwag (for common-sense reasoning). The primary metric is zero-shot accuracy on a 200-sample subset of each task's test split.
This table summarizes the final benchmark scores for the sweelol/gemma3-270m-pruned-baseline model. It is compared directly against the original, un-pruned google/gemma-3-270m to measure the impact of pruning.
| Benchmark Task | Sweelol Pruned-Baseline | Baseline (Gemma-3-270m) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average MMLU (5 tasks) | 26.17% | 24.88% | +1.29% |
| HellaSwag (Common Sense) | 29.50% | 43.50% | -14.00% |
| ---------------------------------- | ---------- | ---------- | -------- |
| MMLU Sub-task Breakdown: | |||
| MMLU - High School Computer Science | 28.00% | 24.00% | +4.00% |
| MMLU - Formal Logic | 29.37% | 25.40% | +3.97% |
| MMLU - Professional Law | 26.00% | 27.00% | -1.00% |
| MMLU - High School Mathematics | 24.50% | 26.00% | -1.50% |
| MMLU - Abstract Algebra | 23.00% | 22.00% | +1.00% |
Gemma-3-270m model, with no subsequent fine-tuning, resulted in a significant improvement in average MMLU performance.HellaSwag score. This highlights a fascinating trade-off between specialized reasoning and general knowledge.Full comparative results with other fine-tuning techniques can be found in our main research notebook linked at the top of this card. These results are from the final benchmark run, which can be reproduced in our public research notebook. The surprising strength of this pruned-only model, particularly on logic and computer science tasks, is a key finding of our study.
SweeLOL-ai
Model Page: Gemma
Resources and Technical Documentation:
Terms of Use: [Terms][terms]
Authors: Google DeepMind
Input:
Output:
@article{gemma_2025,
title={Gemma 3},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.19786},
publisher={Google DeepMind},
author={Gemma Team},
year={2025}
}
This table compares the performance of this Pruned-Baseline model against the original, un-pruned google/gemma-3-270m.
| Benchmark Task | Sweelol Pruned-Baseline | Baseline (Gemma-3-270m) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average MMLU (5 tasks) | 26.17% | 24.88% | +1.29% |
| HellaSwag (Common Sense) | 29.50% | 43.50% | -14.00% |
| ---------------------------------- | ---------- | ---------- | -------- |
| MMLU Sub-task Breakdown: | |||
| MMLU - Formal Logic | 29.37% | 25.40% | +3.97% |
| MMLU - High School Computer Science | 28.00% | 24.00% | +4.00% |
| MMLU - Professional Law | 26.00% | 27.00% | -1.00% |
| MMLU - High School Mathematics | 24.50% | 26.00% | -1.50% |
| MMLU - Abstract Algebra | 23.00% | 22.00% | +1.00% |
A key finding of our research: simply pruning 50% of the weights significantly improved the model's average MMLU performance, especially in logical reasoning tasks. This came at the cost of its common-sense reasoning ability (HellaSwag).
Model Page: Gemma
Resources and Technical Documentation:
Terms of Use: [Terms][terms]
Authors: Google DeepMind
Summary description and brief definition of inputs and outputs.
Gemma is a family of lightweight, state-of-the-art open models from Google, built from the same research and technology used to create the Gemini models. Gemma 3 models are multimodal, handling text and image input and generating text output, with open weights for both pre-trained variants and instruction-tuned variants. Gemma 3 has a large, 128K context window, multilingual support in over 140 languages, and is available in more sizes than previous versions. Gemma 3 models are well-suited for a variety of text generation and image understanding tasks, including question answering, summarization, and reasoning. Their relatively small size makes it possible to deploy them in environments with limited resources such as laptops, desktops or your own cloud infrastructure, democratizing access to state of the art AI models and helping foster innovation for everyone.
Input:
Output:
@article{gemma_2025,
title={Gemma 3},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.19786},
publisher={Google DeepMind},
author={Gemma Team},
year={2025}
}
Data used for model training and how the data was processed.
These models were trained on a dataset of text data that includes a wide variety of sources. The 27B model was trained with 14 trillion tokens, the 12B model was trained with 12 trillion tokens, 4B model was trained with 4 trillion tokens, the 1B with 2 trillion tokens, and the 270M with 6 trillion tokens. The knowledge cutoff date for the training data was August 2024. Here are the key components:
The combination of these diverse data sources is crucial for training a powerful multimodal model that can handle a wide variety of different tasks and data formats.
Here are the key data cleaning and filtering methods applied to the training data:
Details about the model internals.
Gemma was trained using [Tensor Processing Unit (TPU)][tpu] hardware (TPUv4p, TPUv5p and TPUv5e). Training vision-language models (VLMS) requires significant computational power. TPUs, designed specifically for matrix operations common in machine learning, offer several advantages in this domain:
Training was done using [JAX][jax] and [ML Pathways][ml-pathways].
JAX allows researchers to take advantage of the latest generation of hardware, including TPUs, for faster and more efficient training of large models. ML Pathways is Google's latest effort to build artificially intelligent systems capable of generalizing across multiple tasks. This is specially suitable for foundation models, including large language models like these ones.
Together, JAX and ML Pathways are used as described in the [paper about the Gemini family of models][gemini-2-paper]; "the 'single controller' programming model of Jax and Pathways allows a single Python process to orchestrate the entire training run, dramatically simplifying the development workflow."
Model evaluation metrics and results.
These models were evaluated against a large collection of different datasets and metrics to cover different aspects of text generation. Evaluation results marked with IT are for instruction-tuned models. Evaluation results marked with PT are for pre-trained models.
| Benchmark | n-shot | Gemma 3 PT 270M |
|---|---|---|
| HellaSwag | 10-shot | 40.9 |
| BoolQ | 0-shot | 61.4 |
| PIQA | 0-shot | 67.7 |
| TriviaQA | 5-shot | 15.4 |
| ARC-c | 25-shot | 29.0 |
| ARC-e | 0-shot | 57.7 |
| WinoGrande | 5-shot | 52.0 |
| Benchmark | n-shot | Gemma 3 IT 270m |
|---|---|---|
| HellaSwag | 0-shot | 37.7 |
| PIQA | 0-shot | 66.2 |
| ARC-c | 0-shot | 28.2 |
| WinoGrande | 0-shot | 52.3 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | few-shot | 26.7 |
| IF Eval | 0-shot | 51.2 |
| Benchmark | n-shot | Gemma 3 IT 1B | Gemma 3 IT 4B | Gemma 3 IT 12B | Gemma 3 IT 27B |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 0-shot | 19.2 | 30.8 | 40.9 | 42.4 |
| SimpleQA | 0-shot | 2.2 | 4.0 | 6.3 | 10.0 |
| FACTS Grounding | - | 36.4 | 70.1 | 75.8 | 74.9 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 0-shot | 39.1 | 72.2 | 85.7 | 87.6 |
| BIG-Bench Extra Hard | 0-shot | 7.2 | 11.0 | 16.3 | 19.3 |
| IFEval | 0-shot | 80.2 | 90.2 | 88.9 | 90.4 |
| Benchmark | n-shot | Gemma 3 PT 1B | Gemma 3 PT 4B | Gemma 3 PT 12B | Gemma 3 PT 27B |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HellaSwag | 10-shot | 62.3 | 77.2 | 84.2 | 85.6 |
| BoolQ | 0-shot | 63.2 | 72.3 | 78.8 | 82.4 |
| PIQA | 0-shot | 73.8 | 79.6 | 81.8 | 83.3 |
| SocialIQA | 0-shot | 48.9 | 51.9 | 53.4 | 54.9 |
| TriviaQA | 5-shot | 39.8 | 65.8 | 78.2 | 85.5 |
| Natural Questions | 5-shot | 9.48 | 20.0 | 31.4 | 36.1 |
| ARC-c | 25-shot | 38.4 | 56.2 | 68.9 | 70.6 |
| ARC-e | 0-shot | 73.0 | 82.4 | 88.3 | 89.0 |
| WinoGrande | 5-shot | 58.2 | 64.7 | 74.3 | 78.8 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | few-shot | 28.4 | 50.9 | 72.6 | 77.7 |
| DROP | 1-shot | 42.4 | 60.1 | 72.2 | 77.2 |
| Benchmark | n-shot | Gemma 3 IT 1B | Gemma 3 IT 4B | Gemma 3 IT 12B | Gemma 3 IT 27B |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [MMLU][mmlu] (Pro) | 0-shot | 14.7 | 43.6 | 60.6 | 67.5 |
| [LiveCodeBench][lcb] | 0-shot | 1.9 | 12.6 | 24.6 | 29.7 |
| [Bird-SQL][bird-sql] (dev) | - | 6.4 | 36.3 | 47.9 | 54.4 |
| [Math][math] | 0-shot | 48.0 | 75.6 | 83.8 | 89.0 |
| HiddenMath | 0-shot | 15.8 | 43.0 | 54.5 | 60.3 |
| [MBPP][mbpp] | 3-shot | 35.2 | 63.2 | 73.0 | 74.4 |
| [HumanEval][humaneval] | 0-shot | 41.5 | 71.3 | 85.4 | 87.8 |
| [Natural2Code][nat2code] | 0-shot | 56.0 | 70.3 | 80.7 | 84.5 |
| [GSM8K][gsm8k] | 0-shot | 62.8 | 89.2 | 94.4 | 95.9 |
| Benchmark | n-shot | Gemma 3 PT 4B | Gemma 3 PT 12B | Gemma 3 PT 27B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [MMLU][mmlu] | 5-shot | 59.6 | 74.5 | 78.6 |
| [MMLU][mmlu] (Pro COT) | 5-shot | 29.2 | 45.3 | 52.2 |
| [AGIEval][agieval] | 3-5-shot | 42.1 | 57.4 | 66.2 |
| [MATH][math] | 4-shot | 24.2 | 43.3 | 50.0 |
| [GSM8K][gsm8k] | 8-shot | 38.4 | 71.0 | 82.6 |
| GPQA | 5-shot | 15.0 | 25.4 | 24.3 |
| [MBPP][mbpp] | 3-shot | 46.0 | 60.4 | 65.6 |
| [HumanEval][humaneval] | 0-shot | 36.0 | 45.7 | 48.8 |