Downloads · 30 days
6
5% of all-time downloads
sweelol/finetuned-pruned-gemma3-270m-dolly
finetuned-pruned-gemma3-270m-dolly is a text generation model from sweelol. Use it when you need the model to write or continue text. The card lists the license as gemma.
This model is part of the Sweelol AI Hub collection, resulting from experiments in efficient fine-tuning and knowledge distillation on the Gemma-3-270m architecture using the Databricks Dolly-15k dataset on Kaggle TPU…
Downloads · 30 days
6
5% of all-time downloads
All-time downloads
115
Public
Parameters
436M
905 MB on disk
Likes
0
Public
Click a slice to open those files.
.safetensors872 MB · 96%
From the Hugging Face model README
This model is part of the Sweelol AI Hub collection, resulting from experiments in efficient fine-tuning and knowledge distillation on the Gemma-3-270m architecture using the Databricks Dolly-15k dataset on Kaggle TPUs/GPUs.
Full Research Notebook & Benchmark Results: [Link to your final Kaggle Benchmark notebook here]
Key Details:
google/gemma-3-270mThis is a placeholder README. A detailed model card with full results and usage instructions will be added shortly.
This table compares the performance of this Finetuned-Pruned model against the original, un-tuned google/gemma-3-270m base model.
| Benchmark Task | Sweelol Finetuned-Pruned | Baseline (Gemma-3-270m) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average MMLU (5 tasks) | 25.18% | 24.88% | +0.30% |
| HellaSwag (Common Sense) | 29.50% | 43.50% | -14.00% |
| ---------------------------------- | ---------- | ---------- | -------- |
| MMLU Sub-task Breakdown: | |||
| MMLU - Formal Logic | 28.57% | 25.40% | +3.17% |
| MMLU - High School Computer Science | 25.00% | 24.00% | +1.00% |
| MMLU - Professional Law | 25.00% | 27.00% | -2.00% |
| MMLU - Abstract Algebra | 22.00% | 22.00% | 0.00% |
| MMLU - High School Mathematics | 21.00% | 26.00% | -5.00% |
Fine-tuning the pruned model resulted in a solid overall improvement on MMLU, particularly in formal logic. However, like the pruned-only baseline, it suffered a significant drop in common-sense reasoning (HellaSwag).
All models were evaluated on a comprehensive suite of tasks from the lm-evaluation-harness, including 5 diverse subsets of MMLU (for academic reasoning) and HellaSwag (for common-sense reasoning). The primary metric is zero-shot accuracy on a 200-sample subset of each task's test split.
This table summarizes the final benchmark scores for all models created in the Sweelol AI Comparative Study. All fine-tuned models were trained on a subset of the databricks/databricks-dolly-15k dataset.
| Model | Technique | Average MMLU | HellaSwag | MMLU CompSci | MMLU Logic | MMLU Law | MMLU Math | MMLU Algebra |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | (Pre-trained) | 24.88% | 43.50% | 24.00% | 25.40% | 27.00% | 26.00% | 22.00% |
| Pruned-Baseline | Pruning | 26.17% | 29.50% | 28.00% | 29.37% | 26.00% | 24.50% | 23.00% |
| Prompt-Tune | PEFT | 25.77% | 39.00% | 27.00% | 29.37% | 27.50% | 22.00% | 23.00% |
| Finetuned-Pruned | Pruning + FT | 25.18% | 29.50% | 25.00% | 28.57% | 25.00% | 21.00% | 22.00% |
| LoRA | PEFT | 24.60% | 26.00% | 25.00% | 28.57% | 25.00% | 21.00% | 22.00% |
| KD-Pruned | Distillation | 23.98% | 33.00% | 26.00% | 25.40% | 25.00% | 21.50% | 22.00% |
| Full-Finetune | Full FT | 22.60% | 39.00% | 26.00% | 23.02% | 23.50% | 21.50% | 19.00% |
Pruning is a Superpower for Logic: The Pruned-Baseline model, with no fine-tuning, was the undisputed champion on average MMLU performance. It achieved the highest scores in Formal Logic and Computer Science, suggesting that pruning enhances the model's core, pre-trained reasoning abilities.
Prompt Tuning is the Efficiency King: The Prompt-Tune model was the second-best performer on MMLU and retained strong common-sense performance (HellaSwag). This makes it the most efficient and effective overall technique, delivering top-tier results with minimal training.
The "Alignment Tax" is Real: Both Full-Finetune and KD-Pruned models, while trained on instruction data, showed a significant drop in performance on the MMLU reasoning tasks compared to the baseline. This is a classic example of the "alignment tax," where teaching a model to be a helpful assistant can sometimes dilute its raw, academic reasoning capabilities.
Common Sense is Fragile: Techniques that heavily modified the model's structure or weights (Pruning, LoRA) resulted in a significant drop in performance on the HellaSwag common-sense benchmark. The Baseline model remains the champion of common sense.
This comprehensive benchmark provides a clear, data-driven guide for selecting the right optimization technique for a given task.
Model Page: Gemma
Resources and Technical Documentation:
Terms of Use: [Terms][terms]
Authors: Google DeepMind
Summary description and brief definition of inputs and outputs.
Gemma is a family of lightweight, state-of-the-art open models from Google, built from the same research and technology used to create the Gemini models. Gemma 3 models are multimodal, handling text and image input and generating text output, with open weights for both pre-trained variants and instruction-tuned variants. Gemma 3 has a large, 128K context window, multilingual support in over 140 languages, and is available in more sizes than previous versions. Gemma 3 models are well-suited for a variety of text generation and image understanding tasks, including question answering, summarization, and reasoning. Their relatively small size makes it possible to deploy them in environments with limited resources such as laptops, desktops or your own cloud infrastructure, democratizing access to state of the art AI models and helping foster innovation for everyone.
Input:
Output:
@article{gemma_2025,
title={Gemma 3},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.19786},
publisher={Google DeepMind},
author={Gemma Team},
year={2025}
}
Data used for model training and how the data was processed.
These models were trained on a dataset of text data that includes a wide variety of sources. The 27B model was trained with 14 trillion tokens, the 12B model was trained with 12 trillion tokens, 4B model was trained with 4 trillion tokens, the 1B with 2 trillion tokens, and the 270M with 6 trillion tokens. The knowledge cutoff date for the training data was August 2024. Here are the key components:
The combination of these diverse data sources is crucial for training a powerful multimodal model that can handle a wide variety of different tasks and data formats.
Here are the key data cleaning and filtering methods applied to the training data:
Details about the model internals.
Gemma was trained using [Tensor Processing Unit (TPU)][tpu] hardware (TPUv4p, TPUv5p and TPUv5e). Training vision-language models (VLMS) requires significant computational power. TPUs, designed specifically for matrix operations common in machine learning, offer several advantages in this domain:
Training was done using [JAX][jax] and [ML Pathways][ml-pathways].
JAX allows researchers to take advantage of the latest generation of hardware, including TPUs, for faster and more efficient training of large models. ML Pathways is Google's latest effort to build artificially intelligent systems capable of generalizing across multiple tasks. This is specially suitable for foundation models, including large language models like these ones.
Together, JAX and ML Pathways are used as described in the [paper about the Gemini family of models][gemini-2-paper]; "the 'single controller' programming model of Jax and Pathways allows a single Python process to orchestrate the entire training run, dramatically simplifying the development workflow."
Model evaluation metrics and results.
These models were evaluated against a large collection of different datasets and metrics to cover different aspects of text generation. Evaluation results marked with IT are for instruction-tuned models. Evaluation results marked with PT are for pre-trained models.
| Benchmark | n-shot | Gemma 3 PT 270M |
|---|---|---|
| HellaSwag | 10-shot | 40.9 |
| BoolQ | 0-shot | 61.4 |
| PIQA | 0-shot | 67.7 |
| TriviaQA | 5-shot | 15.4 |
| ARC-c | 25-shot | 29.0 |
| ARC-e | 0-shot | 57.7 |
| WinoGrande | 5-shot | 52.0 |
| Benchmark | n-shot | Gemma 3 IT 270m |
|---|---|---|
| HellaSwag | 0-shot | 37.7 |
| PIQA | 0-shot | 66.2 |
| ARC-c | 0-shot | 28.2 |
| WinoGrande | 0-shot | 52.3 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | few-shot | 26.7 |
| IF Eval | 0-shot | 51.2 |
| Benchmark | n-shot | Gemma 3 IT 1B | Gemma 3 IT 4B | Gemma 3 IT 12B | Gemma 3 IT 27B |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 0-shot | 19.2 | 30.8 | 40.9 | 42.4 |
| SimpleQA | 0-shot | 2.2 | 4.0 | 6.3 | 10.0 |
| FACTS Grounding | - | 36.4 | 70.1 | 75.8 | 74.9 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 0-shot | 39.1 | 72.2 | 85.7 | 87.6 |
| BIG-Bench Extra Hard | 0-shot | 7.2 | 11.0 | 16.3 | 19.3 |
| IFEval | 0-shot | 80.2 | 90.2 | 88.9 | 90.4 |
| Benchmark | n-shot | Gemma 3 PT 1B | Gemma 3 PT 4B | Gemma 3 PT 12B | Gemma 3 PT 27B |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HellaSwag | 10-shot | 62.3 | 77.2 | 84.2 | 85.6 |
| BoolQ | 0-shot | 63.2 | 72.3 | 78.8 | 82.4 |
| PIQA | 0-shot | 73.8 | 79.6 | 81.8 | 83.3 |
| SocialIQA | 0-shot | 48.9 | 51.9 | 53.4 | 54.9 |
| TriviaQA | 5-shot | 39.8 | 65.8 | 78.2 | 85.5 |
| Natural Questions | 5-shot | 9.48 | 20.0 | 31.4 | 36.1 |
| ARC-c | 25-shot | 38.4 | 56.2 | 68.9 | 70.6 |
| ARC-e | 0-shot | 73.0 | 82.4 | 88.3 | 89.0 |
| WinoGrande | 5-shot | 58.2 | 64.7 | 74.3 | 78.8 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | few-shot | 28.4 | 50.9 | 72.6 | 77.7 |
| DROP | 1-shot | 42.4 | 60.1 | 72.2 | 77.2 |
| Benchmark | n-shot | Gemma 3 IT 1B | Gemma 3 IT 4B | Gemma 3 IT 12B | Gemma 3 IT 27B |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [MMLU][mmlu] (Pro) | 0-shot | 14.7 | 43.6 | 60.6 | 67.5 |
| [LiveCodeBench][lcb] | 0-shot | 1.9 | 12.6 | 24.6 | 29.7 |
| [Bird-SQL][bird-sql] (dev) | - | 6.4 | 36.3 | 47.9 | 54.4 |
| [Math][math] | 0-shot | 48.0 | 75.6 | 83.8 | 89.0 |
| HiddenMath | 0-shot | 15.8 | 43.0 | 54.5 | 60.3 |
| [MBPP][mbpp] | 3-shot | 35.2 | 63.2 | 73.0 | 74.4 |
| [HumanEval][humaneval] | 0-shot | 41.5 | 71.3 | 85.4 | 87.8 |
| [Natural2Code][nat2code] | 0-shot | 56.0 | 70.3 | 80.7 | 84.5 |
| [GSM8K][gsm8k] | 0-shot | 62.8 | 89.2 | 94.4 | 95.9 |
| Benchmark | n-shot | Gemma 3 PT 4B | Gemma 3 PT 12B | Gemma 3 PT 27B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [MMLU][mmlu] | 5-shot | 59.6 | 74.5 | 78.6 |
| [MMLU][mmlu] (Pro COT) | 5-shot | 29.2 | 45.3 | 52.2 |
| [AGIEval][agieval] | 3-5-shot | 42.1 | 57.4 | 66.2 |
| [MATH][math] | 4-shot | 24.2 | 43.3 | 50.0 |
| [GSM8K][gsm8k] | 8-shot | 38.4 | 71.0 | 82.6 |
| GPQA | 5-shot | 15.0 | 25.4 | 24.3 |
| [MBPP][mbpp] | 3-shot | 46.0 | 60.4 | 65.6 |
| [HumanEval][humaneval] | 0-shot | 36.0 | 45.7 | 48.8 |