Downloads · 30 days
101
35% of all-time downloads
studioburnside/Inkling-Small-REAP25-2bE
Inkling-Small-REAP25-2bE is a image-text-to-text model from studioburnside. Use it for the image-text-to-text task on the model card, and read the license before you ship it in a product. It is set up for mlx. The card lists the license as apache-2.0.
A tiered re-quantization of pipenetwork/Inkling-Small-MLX-REAP25-4bit, itself a REAP-pruned MLX build of thinkingmachines/Inkling-Small. 2-bit routed experts, everything else left at 4-bit. 60GB.
Downloads · 30 days
101
35% of all-time downloads
All-time downloads
288
Public
Parameters
103B
63.9 GB on disk
Likes
0
Public
Click a slice to open those files.
.safetensors63.8 GB · 100%
How the weights are stored.
U32103B · 100%
From the Hugging Face model README
A tiered re-quantization of pipenetwork/Inkling-Small-MLX-REAP25-4bit, itself a REAP-pruned MLX build of thinkingmachines/Inkling-Small. 2-bit routed experts, everything else left at 4-bit. 60GB.
Credit where it belongs: REAP pruning is Cerebras, arXiv:2510.13999;
the pruned 4-bit MLX base and the inkling_mlx loader are
PipeNetwork; the model is Thinking Machines Lab's.
This repo contributes only the expert-tier requant and the measurements below.
Inkling-Small is an unusually capable open multimodal MoE, and the 4-bit REAP build is ~112GB — which fits a 128GB Apple Silicon machine only by leaving no room for a long-context KV cache. The question was simple: do the routed experts survive deeper quantization while attention, embeddings and the shared "sink" experts stay at 4-bit? If yes, you buy back tens of gigabytes of working memory for context, which is the scarce resource on a single machine.
The answer turned out to be interesting in both directions.
| value | |
|---|---|
| intelligence | 0.90 |
| code (evalplus) | PERFECT 20/20 |
| verbosity ratio | 23x |
| decode, single stream | 58.5 tok/s |
| tools | 0.85 (engine-side parsing gaps, not weights — 18/20 with a fixed parser) |
3bE scored 0.97 on intelligence — the best result we have ever recorded on this suite, from any model. 2bE returned a perfect 20/20 on evalplus, which matters because it proves code ability survives 2-bit experts; 3bE's lower code number is an output-duplication artifact, not a weights limitation.
The honest counterpoint: at 2-bit experts, reasoning sometimes fails to terminate (4 parse failures on the intelligence suite). The capability is there; the stopping behaviour degrades.
Long-context evaluation is blocked upstream, not by this quantization:
inkling_mlx checkpoint layout needs engine support (#2451)All three are integration-layer and all are open. Until they land, this is a research artifact: excellent on everything that reaches the weights, unproven past ~8K context.
Requires the inkling_mlx loader and an engine with community-layout support.
Recommend stop=["<|end_message|>"] to suppress the duplication artifact.