Downloads · 30 days
11
42% of all-time downloads
skoda/Vanity-SBU-Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2
Vanity-SBU-Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 is a text classification model from skoda. Use it when you need a label for a piece of text. It is set up for peft. The card lists the license as mit.
This model was fine-tuned on a curated dataset of 10,000 license plate examples, including vanity and standard plates, to classify plates as vanity or non-vanity and assess their acceptance or rejection. It leverages…
Downloads · 30 days
11
42% of all-time downloads
All-time downloads
26
Public
Repo size
1.1 GB
Likes
0
Public
Click a slice to open those files.
.pt738 MB · 66%
From the Hugging Face model README
This model was fine-tuned on a curated dataset of 10,000 license plate examples, including vanity and standard plates, to classify plates as vanity or non-vanity and assess their acceptance or rejection. It leverages Chain of Thought (CoT) reasoning for better interpretability of complex and nuanced semantic patterns in vanity plates. The training utilized the PEFT library with Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) for efficient memory and computation.
The model is intended for research and development, focusing on the semantic and contextual interpretation of vanity license plates. It can classify plates, determine their vanity status, and generate explanations for approval or rejection decisions.
The training dataset includes 10,000 license plates, categorized into accepted and rejected vanity plates, along with standard plates. Semantic features like Named Entity Recognition (NER) and lexical features were integrated for contextual insights. Dataset link - https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1_12PC4b5PdDW4Dv0rF1mBDx7U2Q-QYIW
The model was fine-tuned using Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) with NF4 quantization for memory efficiency and gradient checkpointing to reduce resource usage. The training employed the Paged AdamW optimizer with a learning rate of 2e-4, batch size of 4, and ran for 5 epochs on NVIDIA GPUs in Google Colab. The process focused on minimizing the causal language modeling loss, enabling effective handling of nuanced semantic tasks.
<!-- #### Preprocessing [optional] [More Information Needed] -->20% of the annotated dataset was used as the test set, alongside evaluations on external datasets like the NY License Plate dataset.
<!-- #### Factors --> <!-- These are the things the evaluation is disaggregating by, e.g., subpopulations or domains. --> <!-- [More Information Needed] -->Metrics included accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score for classification. BLEU and ROUGE scores were used to evaluate interpretative explanations.