rubert-ru-sentiment-rureviews

RuBERT-ru-sentiment-RuReviews

RuBERT-ru-sentiment-RuReviews is a RuBERT model fine-tuned on RuReviews dataset of Russian-language reviews from the ”Women’s Clothes and Accessories” product category on the primary e-commerce site in Russia.

<table> <thead> <tr> <th rowspan="4">Model</th> <th rowspan="4">Score<br></th> <th rowspan="4">Rank</th> <th colspan="12">Dataset</th> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="6">SentiRuEval-2016<br></td> <td colspan="2" rowspan="2">RuSentiment</td> <td rowspan="2">KRND</td> <td rowspan="2">LINIS Crowd</td> <td rowspan="2">RuTweetCorp</td> <td rowspan="2">RuReviews</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3">TC</td> <td colspan="3">Banks</td> </tr> <tr> <td>micro F1</td> <td>macro F1</td> <td>F1</td> <td>micro F1</td> <td>macro F1</td> <td>F1</td> <td>wighted</td> <td>F1</td> <td>F1</td> <td>F1</td> <td>F1</td> <td>F1</td> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td>SOTA</td> <td>n/s</td> <td></td> <td>76.71</td> <td>66.40</td> <td>70.68</td> <td>67.51</td> <td>69.53</td> <td>74.06</td> <td>78.50</td> <td>n/s</td> <td>73.63</td> <td>60.51</td> <td>83.68</td> <td>77.44</td> </tr> <tr> <td>XLM-RoBERTa-Large</td> <td>76.37</td> <td>1</td> <td>82.26</td> <td>76.36</td> <td>79.42</td> <td>76.35</td> <td>76.08</td> <td>80.89</td> <td>78.31</td> <td>75.27</td> <td>75.17</td> <td>60.03</td> <td>88.91</td> <td>78.81</td> </tr> <tr> <td>SBERT-Large</td> <td>75.43</td> <td>2</td> <td>78.40</td> <td>71.36</td> <td>75.14</td> <td>72.39</td> <td>71.87</td> <td>77.72</td> <td>78.58</td> <td>75.85</td> <td>74.20</td> <td>60.64</td> <td>88.66</td> <td>77.41</td> </tr> <tr> <td>MBARTRuSumGazeta</td> <td>74.70</td> <td>3</td> <td>76.06</td> <td>68.95</td> <td>73.04</td> <td>72.34</td> <td>71.93</td> <td>77.83</td> <td>76.71</td> <td>73.56</td> <td>74.18</td> <td>60.54</td> <td>87.22</td> <td>77.51</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Conversational RuBERT</td> <td>74.44</td> <td>4</td> <td>76.69</td> <td>69.09</td> <td>73.11</td> <td>69.44</td> <td>68.68</td> <td>75.56</td> <td>77.31</td> <td>74.40</td> <td>73.10</td> <td>59.95</td> <td>87.86</td> <td>77.78</td> </tr> <tr> <td>LaBSE</td> <td>74.11</td> <td>5</td> <td>77.00</td> <td>69.19</td> <td>73.55</td> <td>70.34</td> <td>69.83</td> <td>76.38</td> <td>74.94</td> <td>70.84</td> <td>73.20</td> <td>59.52</td> <td>87.89</td> <td>78.47</td> </tr> <tr> <td>XLM-RoBERTa-Base</td> <td>73.60</td> <td>6</td> <td>76.35</td> <td>69.37</td> <td>73.42</td> <td>68.45</td> <td>67.45</td> <td>74.05</td> <td>74.26</td> <td>70.44</td> <td>71.40</td> <td>60.19</td> <td>87.90</td> <td>78.28</td> </tr> <tr> <td>RuBERT</td> <td>73.45</td> <td>7</td> <td>74.03</td> <td>66.14</td> <td>70.75</td> <td>66.46</td> <td>66.40</td> <td>73.37</td> <td>75.49</td> <td>71.86</td> <td>72.15</td> <td>60.55</td> <td>86.99</td> <td>77.41</td> </tr> <tr> <td>MBART-50-Large-Many-to-Many</td> <td>73.15</td> <td>8</td> <td>75.38</td> <td>67.81</td> <td>72.26</td> <td>67.13</td> <td>66.97</td> <td>73.85</td> <td>74.78</td> <td>70.98</td> <td>71.98</td> <td>59.20</td> <td>87.05</td> <td>77.24</td> </tr> <tr> <td>SlavicBERT</td> <td>71.96</td> <td>9</td> <td>71.45</td> <td>63.03</td> <td>68.44</td> <td>64.32</td> <td>63.99</td> <td>71.31</td> <td>72.13</td> <td>67.57</td> <td>72.54</td> <td>58.70</td> <td>86.43</td> <td>77.16</td> </tr> <tr> <td>EnRuDR-BERT</td> <td>71.51</td> <td>10</td> <td>72.56</td> <td>64.74</td> <td>69.07</td> <td>61.44</td> <td>60.21</td> <td>68.34</td> <td>74.19</td> <td>69.94</td> <td>69.33</td> <td>56.55</td> <td>87.12</td> <td>77.95</td> </tr> <tr> <td>RuDR-BERT</td> <td>71.14</td> <td>11</td> <td>72.79</td> <td>64.23</td> <td>68.36</td> <td>61.86</td> <td>60.92</td> <td>68.48</td> <td>74.65</td> <td>70.63</td> <td>68.74</td> <td>54.45</td> <td>87.04</td> <td>77.91</td> </tr> <tr> <td>MBART-50-Large</td> <td>69.46</td> <td>12</td> <td>70.91</td> <td>62.67</td> <td>67.24</td> <td>61.12</td> <td>60.25</td> <td>68.41</td> <td>72.88</td> <td>68.63</td> <td>70.52</td> <td>46.39</td> <td>86.48</td> <td>77.52</td> </tr> </tbody> </table>

The table shows per-task scores and a macro-average of those scores to determine a models’s position on the leaderboard. For datasets with multiple evaluation metrics (e.g., macro F1 and weighted F1 for RuSentiment), we use an unweighted average of the metrics as the score for the task when computing the overall macro-average. The same strategy for comparing models’ results was applied in the GLUE benchmark.

Citation

If you find this repository helpful, feel free to cite our publication:

@article{Smetanin2021Deep,
  author = {Sergey Smetanin and Mikhail Komarov},
  title = {Deep transfer learning baselines for sentiment analysis in Russian},
  journal = {Information Processing & Management},
  volume = {58},
  number = {3},
  pages = {102484},
  year = {2021},
  issn = {0306-4573},
  doi = {0.1016/j.ipm.2020.102484}
}

Dataset:

@INPROCEEDINGS{Smetanin2019Sentiment,
  author={Sergey Smetanin and Michail Komarov},
  booktitle={2019 IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)},
  title={Sentiment Analysis of Product Reviews in Russian using Convolutional Neural Networks},
  year={2019},
  volume={01},
  pages={482-486},
  doi={10.1109/CBI.2019.00062},
  ISSN={2378-1963},
  month={July}
}