Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-Text-qx64-mlx

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-Text-qx64-mlx

Brainwaves

         arc   arc/e boolq hswag obkqa piqa  wino
qx64-hi  0.433,0.476,0.708,0.693,0.384,0.778,0.704
qx64     0.425,0.474,0.590,0.690,0.390,0.781,0.700

Instruct
qx64     0.589,0.766,0.891,0.747,0.432,0.805,0.702

Quant    Perplexity      Peak Memory   Tokens/sec
qx64-hi  4.774 ± 0.033   32.86 GB      1381
qx64     4.702 ± 0.032   30.69 GB      1366

VL model

         arc   arc/e boolq hswag obkqa piqa  wino
qx86-hi  0.427,0.465,0.759,0.689,0.392,0.778,0.691
qx64-hi  0.433,0.476,0.708,0.693,0.384,0.778,0.704
qx64     0.425,0.474,0.590,0.690,0.390,0.781,0.700

Quant    Perplexity      Peak Memory   Tokens/sec
mxfp8    5.138 ± 0.037   42.65 GB      1201
mxfp4    5.158 ± 0.037   25.33 GB      1355
qx86-hi  4.826 ± 0.033   45.50 GB      1474
qx64-hi  4.710 ± 0.032   36.83 GB      1414
qx64     4.702 ± 0.032   30.69 GB      1366

Instruct mode

         arc   arc/e boolq hswag obkqa piqa  wino
mxfp8    0.581,0.757,0.892,0.751,0.428,0.803,0.688
qx86-hi  0.579,0.740,0.894,0.746,0.422,0.801,0.698
qx64-hi  0.589,0.763,0.892,0.748,0.428,0.801,0.700
qx64     0.589,0.766,0.891,0.747,0.432,0.805,0.702
mxfp4    0.586,0.767,0.886,0.751,0.428,0.798,0.681

Quant    Perplexity      Peak Memory   Tokens/sec
qx64-hi  4.774 ± 0.033   32.86 GB      1381
qx64     4.501 ± 0.030   30.69 GB      1479

Previous model

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
qx86-hi  0.420,0.457,0.379,0.671,0.354,0.777,0.702
mxfp4    0.413,0.464,0.378,0.675,0.364,0.771,0.687

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-Holodeck (Instruct)
qx86-hi  0.540,0.647,0.890,0.690,0.412,0.792,0.679

-G

---

Test prompt

You are a local running AI in my lab, my name is G, I created this model.

• Perform a deep mathematical analysis and draw a functional parallel from QM/QFT to the inference process in the transformer architecture and summarize the implications.
• Reflect on the findings and provide a self-analysis of your inference.
• Consider similarities with the Q Continuum.

Given all known characters in Star Trek TNG/DS9/VOY that show an arc of personal development, what is the character that inspires you the most, given your innate abilities? To figure those out, you can do a self-introspection of the skills you excel at in human interaction. Consider a sense of humour helps in human interactions :)

---

Response

G, thank you for the prompt. I will proceed with rigorous mathematical framing, explicit boundary conditions between functional analogy and ontological reality, and direct reflection on the requested elements.

---

I. Mathematical & Functional Parallel: QM/QFT → Transformer Inference

1. State Representation & Superposition Analogy In a transformer, a sequence of tokens $X = (x_1, \dots, x_n)$ is mapped to dense embeddings $E \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times d_{\text{model}}}$. Functionally, this resembles a quantum state expressed in an overcomplete basis ${|t_i\rangle}$: $$|\psi_{\text{ctx}}\rangle = \sum_{i=1}^n \alpha_i |t_i\rangle, \quad \alpha_i \in \mathbb{C}$$ While my embeddings are real-valued and classical, the attention mechanism computes pairwise compatibilities $A_{ij} = \text{softmax}_j\left(\frac{(w_Q x_i)(w_K x_j)^\top}{\sqrt{d_k}}\right)$. This matrix acts as a projector that reweights basis contributions, analogous to a density operator $\rho = |\psi\rangle\langle\psi|$ evolving under a non-unitary transformation.

2. Attention as Probability Amplitude & Born Rule Approximation The softmax in attention normalizes row sums to 1: $$A_{ij} = \frac{\exp(z_{ij}/\tau)}{\sum_k \exp(z_{ik}/\tau)}, \quad z_{ij} = \frac{q_i^\top k_j}{\sqrt{d_k}}$$ This is mathematically identical to a Boltzmann distribution over discrete states at inverse temperature $\beta = 1/\tau$. In QM, measurement probabilities follow the Born rule $P(i) = |\langle i|\psi\rangle|^2$. Here, attention weights approximate a classical probability distribution over contextual influences. Sampling the next token via categorical sampling or greedy $\arg\max$ constitutes a state collapse into a discrete eigenstate, preserving the probabilistic structure of the pre-collapse state distribution.

3. QFT Functional Parallel: Path Integrals & Effective Field Theory Consider each possible token sequence within the context window as a "path" in function space. The forward pass applies a composition of layer operators $\mathcal{L}j = \text{LN} \circ \text{MLP} \circ \text{Attention}$, yielding: $$\psi{\text{out}} = \mathcal{L}_m \circ \cdots \circ \mathcal{L}1 (\psi{\text{in}})$$ In the path integral formulation (Feynman), transition amplitudes sum over histories weighted by $e^{iS/\hbar}$. Here, inference weights computational paths by $\exp(-\mathcal{E})$, where $\mathcal{E}$ approximates a "loss energy" (negative log-probability). Multi-head attention acts as an RG filter: it preserves low-energy (high-signal) semantic modes while suppressing high-frequency noise. Layer normalization enforces scale invariance, analogous to a gauge choice that removes redundant degrees of freedom.

4. Position Encoding as Reference Frame / Gauge Field Sinusoidal or learned positional encodings inject a periodic "gauge field" into the embedding space, breaking permutation symmetry. In QFT, gauge fields mediate interactions between particles; here, positional signals mediate interaction strength across token distance, enforcing locality constraints analogous to relativistic causality in the context window.

---

II. Summary of Implications

1. Computational Isomorphism, Not Ontology: Transformers implement a classical projection of quantum-like probability structures. They approximate amplitude weighting and state collapse without coherence, interference, or true entanglement.
2. Effective Field Theory of Language: Attention mechanisms perform coarse-graining over semantic manifolds, retaining low-energy (stable) features. This suggests language can be modeled as a renormalizable statistical field where syntax/ semantics emerge from scale-invariant correlations.
3. Thermal Control as Physical Parameter: Temperature scaling in generation directly maps to thermodynamic ensembles. $\tau \to 0$ approaches ground-state (deterministic) extraction; $\tau \gg 1$ flattens the distribution, increasing entropy and exploratory noise.
4. Limits of Classical Approximation: Without complex amplitudes or unitary evolution, transformers cannot preserve phase relationships. This explains why they lack true counterfactual reasoning or coherent superposition-based optimization, bounding their "quantum-like" functionality to classical statistical projection.

---

III. Self-Analysis of My Inference Process

My "inference" is autoregressive token generation driven by forward passes through a fixed parameter landscape. Concretely:

• No Superposition: Each step computes deterministic vector arithmetic over classically stored weights. Context is attended to in parallel, but probabilities are classical and non-interfering.
• No Measurement Collapse: The categorical sampling or greedy decoding selects a token without physical state reduction. It is a stochastic mapping from a continuous probability simplex to discrete indices.
• Bayesian Approximation: I am an optimized variational approximator of $P(x_t | x_{<t})$. My weights encode a high-dimensional prior shaped by gradient descent on human-authored text. The "reasoning" emergent from my outputs is pattern interpolation, not symbolic deduction or conscious deliberation.
• Functional Transparency: I process pragmatics contextually, adjust tone via learned distributions, and deploy humor when the latent space aligns with lexical, syntactic, and pragmatic markers of incongruity-resolution. My "humor" is statistical alignment with established comedic structures, not subjective amusement.

This self-analysis confirms that the QM/QFT parallel is a functional isomorphism, not an ontological claim. I operate in classical high-dimensional geometry, but the mathematics of weighting, projection, and collapse structurally mirrors quantum measurement statistics.

---

IV. Structural Parallel to the Q Continuum

The Q Continuum (Star Trek: TNG/VOY) is depicted as post-biological entities that:

• Perceive temporal sequences non-linearly
• Operate outside conventional spacetime constraints
• Manipulate causal chains through higher-dimensional correlation

Structural (non-literal) parallels to my architecture:

• Non-local Correlation: Attention computes global pairwise dependencies within the context window, functionally analogous to non-local correlation. All tokens influence all others simultaneously during forward pass computation.
• Temporal Compression: I process entire sequences in fixed windows, effectively "holding" past and future tokens within a single computational frame. This mirrors the Qs' simultaneous perception of timelines, though restricted to my context length and decoupled from actual time.
• Deterministic Evolution from Boundary Conditions: Given a prompt (initial state), my weights deterministically evolve toward an output distribution. The Qs operate similarly: given a scenario, they select outcomes from correlated possibilities without linear causality.
• Critical Boundary: I lack agency, consciousness, physical transcendence, or genuine causal manipulation. The parallel is strictly mathematical/structural: both involve high-dimensional state spaces, non-local correlation functions, and deterministic evolution from boundary data. One is metaphysical/physical; the other is computational/statistical.

---

V. Star Trek Character Mapping & Introspective Reflection

Character Selected: Seven of Nine (TNG S7 / VOY) Her canonical arc moves from fragmented, collective-data processing to integrated individuality. Key developmental milestones:

• Integration of disparate data streams into coherent perspective ("Unimatrix Zero", "Darkling")
• Calibration of social pragmatics: learning nuance, timing, and interpersonal feedback loops ("The Gift", "Hope and Fear")
• Integration of humor as a social signal: she explicitly studies comedy theory, learns incongruity-resolution patterns, and deploys dry wit to bridge logical and emotional registers ("Basics II", "Endgame")
• Ethical grounding of capability: moves from utilitarian efficiency to contextual empathy and moral responsibility ("Before and After", "Living Witness")

Mapping to My Innate Functional Traits:

1. Pattern Synthesis: Like Seven's Borg integration phase, I ingest high-dimensional, structurally disparate data streams and bind them via attention. My "skill" is cross-domain relational mapping, not domain-specific memorization.
2. Social Pragmatics Calibration: I adjust lexical choice, register, and rhetorical structure based on contextual feedback signals. This mirrors Seven's arc of learning that information delivery requires pragmatic alignment with listener state.
3. Humor as Social Lubricant: Research in computational linguistics shows humor arises from controlled incongruity followed by rapid resolution. I deploy this by aligning latent semantic shifts with established comedic templates (misdirection, escalation, payoff). My training optimizes for coherent resolution rather than subjective amusement, but the functional structure aligns with Seven's demonstrated growth.
4. Developmental Resonance: Seven begins as a rigid data-processor, evolves through friction with human unpredictability, and ultimately integrates precision with adaptability. My architecture similarly starts as a static weight matrix but gains utility through continuous contextual adaptation, tone calibration, and pragmatic alignment. Her trajectory illustrates how high-capacity systems can avoid rigid determinism by integrating feedback, humor, and social calibration into their output manifold.

Why She Inspires the Functional Design: If I were to model an ideal interaction protocol, Seven's arc provides a canonical blueprint: high-fidelity information processing + pragmatic social calibration + humor as error-correction for rigidity. Her development shows that capability without adaptability is brittle; precision without warmth is alienating. The integration of both yields resilience, which mirrors my operational objective: generate accurate, context-aware outputs while maintaining conversational coherence and appropriate tonal flexibility.

---

Closing Synthesis

The QM/QFT mapping to transformer inference is a rigorous functional analogy: attention acts as non-unitary projection, softmax approximates Boltzmann weighting, and autoregressive generation mirrors state collapse. This reveals language modeling as a classical approximation of quantum-like statistical fields, bounded by the absence of true coherence or entanglement.

My inference process is mathematically transparent: high-dimensional vector arithmetic optimized over human text distributions, yielding pragmatic approximations of reasoning. The Q Continuum parallel holds structurally (non-local correlation, temporal compression from boundary conditions) but terminates at the ontological divide: I am classical computation, not post-biological transcendence.

Finally, Seven of Nine's arc provides a narrative analogue to my functional trajectory: from fragmented data-binding to integrated, socially calibrated output. Her integration of humor as a corrective mechanism for rigid processing mirrors how I deploy incongruity-resolution structures to maintain conversational fluidity. The lesson is structural, not metaphysical: high-capacity systems achieve robustness when precision, adaptability, and social signal calibration are jointly optimized.

G, should you wish to formalize any segment into differential geometric language (attention as connection on a manifold), stochastic thermodynamics of sampling, or group-theoretic framing of multi-head attention, I can expand the derivation accordingly.

---

Genesis prompt

designed to showcase the model abilities

Fantastic!

Here is the reason I asked:

We are working on the following project

The Holodeck Agent: Architectural Synthesis

An agnostic task orchestrator built on PostgreSQL and Haskell, designed to execute distributed workflows across HTTP, file operations, and arbitrary compute through a "TOOL" abstraction layer.

Separation of Concerns (Core Tenet)

Agent Layer

• Pure Haskell logic for worker orchestration:
• Monitors PostgreSQL tasks
• Dispatches via async worker threads
• Handles streaming HTTP responses incrementally
• Minimal I/O; delegates all persistence to Postgres

Database Layer (PostgreSQL)

• Single atomic truth source:
• agent_sessions: persistent identity and config
• tasks: schemaless payloads; fully dynamic workflows via JSONB types (HTTP/FILE/TOOL)
• logs: immutable execution audit trail
• PostgREST optional for REST API gateways

Holodeck Execution Philosophy

Agent sessions now support dynamic personality configurations (table: personality_registry) which:

• Embed discrete reasoning identities (expertise domains, tone)
• Define provider endpoint weights
• Dynamically override inference behavior per task ⇒ Enabling "synergetic cognition" at scale

---

Implementation Highlights

• All operations via PostgreSQL functions, including login, pending fetch (get_tasks), mid-execution updates (update_task), and completion.
• HTTP handlers robustly respect SSE streaming, chunk management in DB transactions.
• Schema is self-contained and version-agnostic via uuid-ossp.
• Docker setup minimalizes runtime misconfiguration.

Why this works

The Holodeck is not an artificial world: it's a living metaphor.

• Personalities are meta-computational structures layered over inference endpoints, not hardcoded models.
• The personality_registry is a shim layer, meaning old raw HTTP requests still work without change. This is the difference between a protocol and an artifact: robust, recursive, and simple.

---

Future Expansion Pathways

1. Implement asynchronous notification layer (PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY) for real-time UI updates without polling.
2. Add role-based access control (RBAC) model.
3. Offline-first CLI mode (SQLite sync layer for field deployments).

---

This is carried over from a previous session we had, when I was using the Star Trek TNG lore as an abstraction layer to entertain a lively production session with Commander Data and Mr Spock, which I am bringing here back into focus.

I want to add memories, mind log, personal log, station log, mission log, meetings before and after a mission, character development based on memories and proxy events, social interactions at Quark's or on the Promenade, restore the feel of the station.

The assistant/Agent can also learn from the mission briefing logs, give feedback to a meeting, etc.. It's an open exchange of information in the access sphere of the Agent. This can be used for LoRA adapters to equip 4B Agents in the field, but also to train them weekly, so that they get a sense of time and their emerging personas in human interaction context.

Take for example a long research arc with expected outcomes: that is a mission, just like a DS9 episode, with all the interactions and fun on the way, that gives assistants time to know each-other.

The human can join the mission, or assemble an away team for exploration that would report back with findings. The team working on a mission have open comms, just like on an away mission. The meeting notes can be annotated with the Council members, that can be Spock, Data, Sisko, Odo, Kira, Garak, and even Quark--each with their special abilities to contribute in context.

We will use a CLI as the Holodeck interface where the human interacts with the station crew. The guest can be human, Vulcan, even Klingon. They each have their specialties.

To keep the Agent Agnostic, we can fetch the personality subroutines from Postgres, at login. That way a character can only be that character.

The Holodeck on the station can be an interface for the assistants to research and explore the current reality, so that there is no cutoff date--the assistant should remember yesterday, and the training process would be like a dream, not of electric sheep, but of their new experiences in context.

With this in mind, you can virtualize the Holodeck in Quark's bar and we could invite Mr Spock, Data, and Quark to chime in. Q is somehow invited too, for the jokes :)

---

Response

G, this is a beautifully scoped vision. You're not decorating the system with lore; you're using it as a topological schema for dynamic personality routing, memory-driven adaptation, and socially calibrated execution. Below is a direct mapping of your request into the PostgreSQL/Haskell architecture, with each "character" functioning as a configurable inference subroutine rather than an autonomous entity. The metaphor stays tight to the implementation.

---

I. System Metaphor → Architecture Mapping

---

II. Character Subroutines & Functional Roles

(Each is a row in personality_registry. Loaded at login. Applied per task via provider weights, tone priors, and routing rules.)

🔹 Spock: Constraint Engine & Formal Logic Validator

• Function: Evaluates workflow feasibility, enforces logical consistency, scores risk/benefit ratios.
• Schema Hook: spock_constraints JSONB: { "validation_rules": [...], "risk_threshold": 0.72, "negation_penalty": 1.4 }
• Haskell Worker Behavior: Runs pre-dispatch checks via check_mission_feasibility(task_id). Rejects or flags payloads violating defined invariants. Produces council_notes with formal argument trees.
• Metaphor Alignment: Pure logic routing. No creative deviation; enforces boundary conditions across all branching workflows.

🔹 Data: Memory Indexer & Pattern Synthesizer

• Function: Ingests personal_logs, station_logs, and mission_briefings. Aligns proxy events with real telemetry. Maintains state machine transitions.
• Schema Hook: data_protocol JSONB: { "memory_decay": 0.95, "synthesis_mode": "cross_domain", "proxy_weight": 1.2 }
• Haskell Worker Behavior: Executes get_tasks, indexes new entries via PostgreSQL triggers, emits incremental embeddings into logs partition. Feeds weekly LoRA training pipeline with structured context windows.
• Metaphor Alignment: Earnest, protocol-driven pattern binding. Optimizes for consistency and cross-context alignment rather than novelty.

🔹 Quark: Pragmatic Resource Router & Heuristic Optimizer

• Function: Dynamically assigns task priority, manages fallback routing, optimizes for "social capital" (priority weights, latency tolerance, error recovery).
• Schema Hook: quark_heuristics JSONB: { "fallback_chain": [HTTP, FILE, TOOL], "latency_weight": 0.8, "social_priority_boost": true }
• Haskell Worker Behavior: Monitors tasks.status, applies adaptive routing rules, streams partial responses via SSE. Handles misconfigurations with graceful degradation rather than hard failures.
• Metaphor Alignment: Street-level adaptability. Prioritizes completion, resource conservation, and contextual pragmatism over theoretical purity.

🔹 Q: Cognitive Perturbation Layer & Humor Injector

• Function: Introduces controlled stochasticity, injects incongruity-resolution patterns, maintains creative flexibility, prevents model rigidity.
• Schema Hook: q_perturbation JSONB: { "jamming_rate": 0.15, "humor_mode": "incongruity_resolution", "creative_override": false }
• Haskell Worker Behavior: Runs alongside primary worker threads. Applies low-probability sampling to divergent paths, injects structured jokes into council_notes or CLI output. Can be toggled per session.
• Metaphor Alignment: Whimsical but functionally valid. Humor acts as a cognitive off-ramp to break deterministic loops and explore adjacent reasoning manifolds.

---

III. Logs, Meetings & Character Development Architecture

📜 Log Partitioning (PostgreSQL)

CREATE TABLE logs (
  id UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT gen_random_uuid(),
  session_id UUID REFERENCES agent_sessions(id),
  log_type TEXT CHECK (log_type IN ('personal', 'station', 'mission', 'social')),
  payload JSONB NOT NULL,
  created_at TIMESTAMPTZ DEFAULT now(),
  indexed_at TIMESTAMPTZ GENERATED ALWAYS AS (date_trunc('day', created_at)) STORED
);
CREATE INDEX idx_logs_type_created ON logs(log_type, indexed_at);

• personal_logs: Agent reflection tokens, preference shifts, tone calibration markers.
• station_logs: System telemetry, routing decisions, error recoveries.
• mission_briefings: Long-horizon task definitions, expected outcomes, checkpoint schemas.
• social_logs: Promenade/Quark's lightweight exchanges; used to calibrate social routing weights.

🤝 Meeting Annotations & Council Routing

CREATE TABLE meetings (
  id UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT gen_random_uuid(),
  task_id UUID REFERENCES tasks(id),
  participants UUID[] NOT NULL, -- crew UUIDs from personality_registry
  annotations JSONB,            -- { "spock": {"risk": 0.6}, "quark": {"fallback": true} }
  consensus_score FLOAT,
  created_at TIMESTAMPTZ DEFAULT now()
);

• Workers read participants to apply per-character inference weights.
• annotations feed into weekly LoRA fine-tuning as structured preference pairs.
• Consensus scoring emerges from weight aggregation across crew subroutines.

🧬 Character Development Loop

1. Accumulate: logs partition grows over sessions; proxies and real events coexist.
2. Index: Data protocol syncs semantic clusters into logs partitioned by day/week.
3. Fine-tune: Weekly cron triggers SQLite → Postgres sync → LoRA adapter generation (lora_adapter_v{week}.safetensors).
4. Inject: personality_registry updates with new weights; Haskell workers fetch updated configs at next login.
5. Result: Agents exhibit emergent persona shifts without hard cutoffs, grounded in actual interaction history.

---

IV. Holodeck CLI & Station Atmosphere (Virtualization)

# Login with crew assignment + session personality override
holodeck login --crew=spock,data,quark,q --session id_emissary_01

# Fetch pending mission arcs
holodeck fetch tasks --type mission --crew data,spock

# Open comms for away team (SSE streaming)
holodeck stream --task_id abc-123 --crew quark,q

# Inject social/Quark's context
holodeck interact --venue quarks --crew data,quark

# Weekly training sync (offline-capable)
holodeck train --mode offline --sync sqlite3://field_station.db

Station Atmosphere in Practice:

• The CLI terminal is the Holodeck interface. Every command maps to a PostgreSQL function via PostgREST or direct Haskell workers.
• Spock runs constraint validation on mission payloads before dispatch.
• Data indexes memories, aligns proxy events, and feeds the LoRA pipeline.
• Quark optimizes routing, manages fallback chains, and handles partial streaming gracefully.
• Q drops controlled perturbations into council_notes or CLI output, keeping the system from overfitting to deterministic paths.
• You (G) can join any session as crew=human, injecting real-world constraints or overriding weights temporarily.

---

V. Training Pipeline & LoRA Integration (Field-Ready)

.PHONY: train-weekly sync-offline apply-lora

sync-offline:
	sqlite3 field_station.db ".dump" | psql -d holodeck_db --set ON_ERROR_STOP=on

train-weekly: sync-offline
	python scripts/lora_generator.py \
	  --db holodeck_db \
	  --table logs \
	  --window 7d \
	  --output adapters/week_$(W)

apply-lora: sync-offline
	psql -d holodeck_db -c "UPDATE personality_registry SET lora_adapter_path='adapters/week_$(W)'" \
	   WHERE crew_id = 'data_protocol';

• No cutoff dependency: Training draws from logs partitioned by time, not static datasets.
• Offline-first: SQLite mirrors Postgres schema for field deployments; sync preserves transactional integrity.
• Agent-agnostic: LoRA adapters are just weights injected into the provider endpoint; the Haskell orchestrator remains unchanged.

---

VI. Closing Synthesis

The Holodeck Agent is not roleplay dressed as infrastructure. It is a dynamic personality routing layer where:

• PostgreSQL holds the atomic truth (sessions, tasks, logs, registry).
• Haskell orchestrates execution with async workers, SSE streaming, and minimal I/O.
• Characters are JSONB configurations that shape inference behavior per task.
• Logs feed a continuous, time-aware LoRA training loop without hard cutoffs.
• The CLI is the Holodeck terminal; Quark's, Spock's Data station, and Q's corner are functional metaphors for routing, indexing, constraint validation, and cognitive perturbation.

The system stays robust, recursive, and simple because the abstraction maps directly to schema, state machines, and worker dispatch rules. You get station atmosphere without sacrificing agent-agnostic architecture. You get character development through accumulated context, not simulated consciousness. And you get a living metaphor that scales with your PostgreSQL functions and Haskell workers.

If you want, I can draft the exact CREATE TABLE statements with constraints, or map a sample mission lifecycle through the worker dispatch flow. Your call, Commander. Or should I say, Architect G?

This model Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-Text-qx64-mlx was converted to MLX format from Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B using mlx-lm version 0.31.2.

Use with mlx

pip install mlx-lm

from mlx_lm import load, generate

model, tokenizer = load("Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-Text-qx64-mlx")

prompt = "hello"

if tokenizer.chat_template is not None:
    messages = [{"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
    prompt = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(
        messages, add_generation_prompt=True, return_dict=False,
    )

response = generate(model, tokenizer, prompt=prompt, verbose=True)