Downloads · 30 days
24
3% of all-time downloads
mrsteyk/openchatgpt-neo-125m
openchatgpt-neo-125m is a text generation model from mrsteyk. Use it when you need the model to write or continue text. It is set up for transformers. The card lists the license as mit.
This model is a fine-tuned version of EleutherAI/gpt-neo-125M on the openchatgpt safe-r1 dataset. It achieves the following results on the evaluation set: - Loss: 3.2156 - Accuracy: 0.8338
Downloads · 30 days
24
3% of all-time downloads
All-time downloads
762
Public
Parameters
176M
1.1 GB on disk
Likes
1
Public
Click a slice to open those files.
.bin551 MB · 50%
How the weights are stored.
F32125M · 71%
From the Hugging Face model README
This model is a fine-tuned version of EleutherAI/gpt-neo-125M on the openchatgpt safe-r1 dataset. It achieves the following results on the evaluation set:
Finetune based on the inner workings of ChatGPT. I won't elaborate on that. You must have a faint idea of how prompt is made for it to spit anything that's not garbled mess.
This is effectively a schizophrenic idea that met the light of day. Practically a collab of 3 students in a virtual shed.
Intended uses & limitations fall in line with OpenAI's. Dataset used consists of safe texts (i.e. not highly sexual/erotica type stuff). NSFW version of the dataset is not planned to exist at the moment.
Keep in mind that this is a 125m version of GPT-Neo. My 1050Ti Mobile couldn't even handle that without gradient thingmabobs. If anyone knows how to effectively finetune larger models on free colabs - feel free to let me know. Pile tokenizer also has one downside compared to native GPT-2/3 - Assistant.
Data was split in ratio of 95%/5%. Preproccess included removing mentions of OpenAI wherever it was not deemed appropriete (GPT-2 has one of the appropriete mentions). Whole dataset consists of just shy off 3k input-output pairs. One input has multiple outputs (read as: one message has multiple variants of an answer). <<<1% (3 total) are curated lines (i.e. a huge mistake was spotted that needed corrections).
Heavy bias on IT.
Input and output were straight up concatenated due to the nature of how ChatGPT works. Padding chosen was the same as the separator token, if that's not effective - please let me know as I am new to this stuff.
The following hyperparameters were used during training:
| Training Loss | Epoch | Step | Validation Loss | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.9203 | 1.0 | 1378 | 5.1668 | 0.7274 |
| 4.1368 | 2.0 | 2756 | 4.3841 | 0.7563 |
| 3.4554 | 3.0 | 4134 | 3.8068 | 0.7875 |
| 2.7598 | 4.0 | 5512 | 3.3097 | 0.8303 |
| 2.5879 | 5.0 | 6890 | 3.2156 | 0.8338 |