Downloads · 30 days
163
4% of all-time downloads
mgonzs13/SpaceOm-GGUF
SpaceOm-GGUF is a image-text-to-text model from mgonzs13. Use it for the image-text-to-text task on the model card, and read the license before you ship it in a product. It is set up for llama.cpp. The card lists the license as apache-2.0.
This model is evaluated in the paper SpaCE-10: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models in Compositional Spatial Intelligence. The code for the SpaCE-10 benchmark is available at: https://github.…
Downloads · 30 days
163
4% of all-time downloads
All-time downloads
3.8K
Public
Repo size
21.2 GB
Likes
1
Public
Click a slice to open those files.
.gguf21.2 GB · 100%
From the Hugging Face model README
This model is evaluated in the paper SpaCE-10: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models in Compositional Spatial Intelligence. The code for the SpaCE-10 benchmark is available at: https://github.com/Cuzyoung/SpaCE-10.
Model creator: remyxai<br>
Original model: SpaceOm<br>
GGUF quantization: llama.cpp commit 2baf07727f921d9a4a1b63a2eff941e95d0488ed<br>
SpaceOm improves over SpaceThinker by adding:
o_proj in LoRA fine-tuningThe choice to include o_proj among the target modules in LoRA finetuning was inspired by the study here, which argues for
the importance of this module in reasoning models.
The reasoning traces in the SpaceThinker dataset average ~200 "thinking" tokens so now we've included longer reasoning traces in the training data to help the model use more tokens in reasoning.
Aiming to improve alignment for robotics applications, we've trained with synthetic reasoning traces, derived from the Robo2VLM-1 dataset.
| Model | Overall | Count. | Obj.-Loc. | Pos.-Rel. | Dist. | Obj.-Prop. | Cam.&IT. | Tracking | Others |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SpaceQwen2.5-VL-3B | 42.31 | 45.01 | 49.78 | 57.88 | 27.36 | 34.11 | 26.34 | 26.44 | 43.58 |
| SpatialBot-Phi2-3B | 41.65 | 53.23 | 54.32 | 55.40 | 27.12 | 26.10 | 24.21 | 27.57 | 41.66 |
| Kimi-VL-3B | 51.48 | 49.22 | 61.99 | 61.34 | 38.27 | 46.74 | 33.75 | 56.28 | 47.23 |
| Kimi-VL-3B-Thinking | 52.60 | 52.66 | 58.93 | 63.28 | 39.38 | 42.57 | 32.00 | 46.97 | 42.73 |
| Qwen2.5-VL-3B | 47.90 | 46.62 | 55.55 | 62.23 | 32.39 | 32.97 | 30.66 | 36.90 | 42.19 |
| InternVL2.5-4B | 49.82 | 53.32 | 62.02 | 62.02 | 32.80 | 27.00 | 32.49 | 37.02 | 48.95 |
| SpaceOm (3B) | 49.00 | 56.00 | 54.00 | 65.00 | 41.00 | 50.00 | 36.00 | 42.00 | 47.00 |
See all results for evaluating SpaceOm on the SpatialScore benchmark.
Compared to SpaceQwen, this model outperforms by all categories
<img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/647777304ae93470ffc28913/tyrLNKsW3PAuZ8t7pCKU6.png" width="800">And comparing to SpaceThinker:
<img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/647777304ae93470ffc28913/TWRLWismj3-HduHUkTAuM.png" width="800">This table compares SpaceOm evaluated using GPT scoring against several top models from the SpaCE-10 benchmark leaderboard. Top scores in each category are bolded.
| Model | EQ | SQ | SA | OO | OS | EP | FR | SP | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SpaceOm | 32.47 | 24.81 | 47.63 | 50.00 | 32.52 | 9.12 | 37.04 | 25.00 | GPT Eval |
| Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct | 32.70 | 31.00 | 41.30 | 32.10 | 27.60 | 15.40 | 26.30 | 27.50 | Table |
| LLaVA-OneVision-7B | 37.40 | 36.20 | 42.90 | 44.20 | 27.10 | 11.20 | 45.60 | 27.20 | Table |
| VILA1.5-7B | 30.20 | 38.60 | 39.90 | 44.10 | 16.50 | 35.10 | 30.10 | 37.60 | Table |
| InternVL2.5-4B | 34.30 | 34.40 | 43.60 | 44.60 | 16.10 | 30.10 | 33.70 | 36.70 | Table |
Legend:
ℹ️ Note: Scores for SpaceOm are generated via
gpt_eval_scoreon single-choice (*-single) versions of the SpaCE-10 benchmark tasks. Other entries reflect leaderboard accuracy scores from the official SpaCE-10 evaluation table.
Read more about the SpaCE-10 benchmark
Users are encouraged to evaluate outputs critically and consider fine-tuning for domain-specific safety and performance. Distances estimated using autoregressive transformers may help in higher-order reasoning for planning and behavior but may not be suitable replacements for measurements taken with high-precision sensors, calibrated stereo vision systems, or specialist monocular depth estimation models capable of more accurate, pixel-wise predictions and real-time performance.
@article{chen2024spatialvlm,
title = {SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilities},
author = {Chen, Boyuan and Xu, Zhuo and Kirmani, Sean and Ichter, Brian and Driess, Danny and Florence, Pete and Sadigh, Dorsa and Guibas, Leonidas and Xia, Fei},
journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12168},
year = {2024},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.12168},
}
@misc{qwen2.5-VL,
title = {Qwen2.5-VL},
url = {https://qwenlm.github.io/blog/qwen2.5-vl/},
author = {Qwen Team},
month = {January},
year = {2025}
}
@misc{vl-thinking2025,
title={SFT or RL? An Early Investigation into Training R1-Like Reasoning Large Vision-Language Models },
author={Hardy Chen and Haoqin Tu and Fali Wang and Hui Liu and Xianfeng Tang and Xinya Du and Yuyin Zhou and Cihang Xie},
year = {2025},
publisher = {GitHub},
journal = {GitHub repository},
howpublished = {\url{https://github.com/UCSC-VLAA/VLAA-Thinking}},
}
@article{wu2025spatialscore,
author = {Wu, Haoning and Huang, Xiao and Chen, Yaohui and Zhang, Ya and Wang, Yanfeng and Xie, Weidi},
title = {SpatialScore: Towards Unified Evaluation for Multimodal Spatial Understanding},
journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.17012},
year = {2025},
}
@article{gong2025space10,
title = {SpaCE-10: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models in Compositional Spatial Intelligence},
author = {Ziyang Gong and Wenhao Li and Oliver Ma and Songyuan Li and Jiayi Ji and Xue Yang and Gen Luo and Junchi Yan and Rongrong Ji},
journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.07966},
year = {2025},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.07966}
}