Downloads · 30 days
93
0% of all-time downloads
lizpreciatior/lzlv_70b_fp16_hf
lzlv_70b_fp16_hf is a text generation model from lizpreciatior. Use it when you need the model to write or continue text. It is set up for transformers. The card lists the license as cc-by-nc-2.0.
A multi-model merge of several LLaMA2 70B finetunes for roleplaying and creative work. The goal was to create a model that combines creativity with intelligence for an enhanced experience.
Downloads · 30 days
93
0% of all-time downloads
All-time downloads
52.6K
Public
Parameters
69B
139 GB on disk
Likes
78
Public
Click a slice to open those files.
.safetensors139 GB · 100%
How the weights are stored.
BF1668.5B · 99%
From the Hugging Face model README
A multi-model merge of several LLaMA2 70B finetunes for roleplaying and creative work. The goal was to create a model that combines creativity with intelligence for an enhanced experience.
Did it work? Probably, maybe. It seemed subjectively better than each of the individual models in my tests.
GGUF 4_K_M + 5_K_M can be found here: https://huggingface.co/lizpreciatior/lzlv_70b_fp16_hf/settings
Update 29/10: Thank you to TheBloke for making the whole range of quants for lzlv: https://huggingface.co/TheBloke/lzlv_70B-GGUF
Also recommended: lzlv merged with limarpv3 - check it out here: https://huggingface.co/Doctor-Shotgun/lzlv-limarpv3-l2-70b/tree/main Thanks for merging the LoRA. I think it gives the model a bit more creative spice.
lzlvV2 is in the works. Soon(tm).
Models used:
A big thank you to the creators of the models above. If you look up Mythospice, you will notice that it also includes Nous-Hermes so it's technically present twice in this mix. This is apparently common practice amongst the cool kids who do 13B models so I don't think this hurts the model.
The merging process was heavily inspired by Undi95's approach in Undi95/MXLewdMini-L2-13B. To be specific, the ratios are:
Component 1: Merge of Mythospice x Xwin with SLERP gradient [0.25, 0.3, 0.5]. Component 2: Merge Xwin x Hermes with SLERP gradient [0.4, 0.3, 0.25].
Finally, both Component 1 and Component 2 were merged with SLERP using weight 0.5.
I tested this model for a few days before publishing it. It seems to more or less retain the instruction-following capabilities of Xwin-70B, while seeming to have adopted a lot of the creativity of the other two models. It handled my more complex scenarios that creative models otherwise tend to struggle with quite well. At the same time, its outputs felt more creative and possibly a bit more nsfw-inclined than Xwin-70b. So, is it better? Feels like it to me, subjectively. Is it really better? No clue, test it.
Vicuna USER: [Prompt] ASSISTANT: