span-marker-luke-legal

Try a prompt

• The seven-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in SBP and Co. (supra) while reversing earlier five-judge Constitution Bench judgment in Konkan Railway Corpn. Ltd. vs. Rani Construction (P) Ltd., (2002) 2 SCC 388 held that the power exercised by the Chief Justice of the High Court or the Chief justice of India under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act is not an administrative power but is a judicial power.Copy
• In The High Court Of Judicature At Patna Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.160 of 2021 Arising Out of Ps. Case No.-58 Year-2020 Thana- Bakhari District- Begusarai ====================================================== Hanif Ur Rahman, son of Azhar Rahman, Resident of C-39, East Nizamuddin, New Delhi....... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar (through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar) Main Secretariat, Patna - 800015. 2. Meena Khatoon, wife of Mastan @ Noor Mohammad, Resident of Village- Mansurpur Chaksikandar, P.S.- Bidupur, District- Vaishali (Bihar) 3. The Bihar Police, through Standing Counsel. 4. Child Welfare Committee, through Chairperson, Chanakyanagar, Mahmadpur, Begusarai. 5. The Superintendent, Alpawas Grih, Nirala Nagar, Behind G.D. College, Ratanpur, Begusarai....... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance:For the Petitioner:Ms. Kriti Awasthi, Advocate Mr. Sambhav Gupta, Advocate Mr. Navnit Kumar, Advocate Mr. Shyam Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents:Mr.Nadim Seraj, G.P.5 For the Resp. No. 2:Ms. Archana Sinha, Advocate For the Resp. No. 4:Mr. Prabhu Narain Sharma, Advocate ====================================================== Coram: Honourable Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad C.A.V. JudgmentCopy
• 1 R In The High Court Of Karnataka At Bengaluru Dated This The 19Th Day Of February, 2021 Before The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice H.P. Sandesh Criminal Appeal No.176/2011 Between: Sri G.L. Jagadish, S/O Sri G.N. Lingappa, Aged About 52 Years, Residing At No.29, 3Rd Main, Basaveshwara Housing Society Layout, Vijayanagar, Near Bts Depot, Bengaluru-40....Appellant [By Sri H. Ramachandra, Advocate For Sri H.R. Anantha Krishna Murthy And Associates - (Through V.C.)] And: Smt. Vasantha Kokila, W/O Late N.R. Somashekhar, Aged About 58 Years, Residing At No.322, 8Th Main, 3Rd Stage, 4Th Block, Basaveshwaranagar, Bengaluru....Respondent [By Sri K.R. Lakshminarayana Rao, Advocate] This Criminal Appeal Is Filed Under Section 378(4) Of Cr.P.C. Praying To Set Aside The Order Dated 06.07.2010 Passed By The P.O. Ftc-Ii, Bengaluru In Crl.A. No.470/2009 And Confirming The Order Dated 27.05.2009 Passed By The Xxii Acmm And Xxiv Ascj, Bengaluru In C.C.No.17229/2004 Convicting The Respondent/Accused For The Offence Punishable Under Section 138 Of Ni Act. 2 This Criminal Appeal Having Been Heard And Reserved For Orders On 06.02.2021 This Day, The Court Pronounced The Following: JudgmentCopy
• The petition was filed through Sh. Vijay Pahwa, General Power of Attorney and it was asserted in the petition under Section 13-B of the Rent Act that 1 of 23 50% share of the demised premises had been purchased by the landlord from Sh. Vinod Malhotra vide sale deed No.4226 registered on 20.12.2007 with Sub Registrar, Chandigarh.Copy