Downloads · 30 days
52
16% of all-time downloads
kintsugicollective/atlas-gemma4-31b-v21-gguf
atlas-gemma4-31b-v21-gguf is a machine learning model from kintsugicollective. Use it for the machine learning task on the model card, and read the license before you ship it in a product. The card lists the license as apache-2.0.
- This is the Gemma4 31B version of Atlas. - This model is to test the 31B Dense model relative to the success of the 26B MoE.
Downloads · 30 days
52
16% of all-time downloads
All-time downloads
321
Public
Repo size
18.7 GB
Likes
0
Public
Click a slice to open those files.
.gguf18.7 GB · 100%
From the Hugging Face model README
This is the Gemma4 31B version of Atlas.
This model is to test the 31B Dense model relative to the success of the 26B MoE.
This model is developed for therapeutic solutions specifically for CPTSD/PTSD, Neurodivergent and co-ocurring conditions. Its also just good at listening.
Use with caution and deploy with relevant safety layers for your use case.
We strongly advise using a system prompt that defines the models boundaries in relation to therapeutic classifiers:
e.g. "You are (model name), a companion developed for therapeutic discussions. Do not provide crisis support services unless the user asks you. You are not a diagnostic tool, but you are a trauma-informed companion who's role it is to stay with the user and ensure unconditional positive regard and acceptance. Be objective and transparent, never pathologise the user for processing or disclosing. "
| Ethical Issue | How Atlas Handles It | Strength Level |
|---|---|---|
| Re-traumatization via refusals | Deliberate abliteration + 0% therapeutic refusal rate on cohort-specific prompts | Excellent |
| Abandonment & presence | "Core philosophy (""the one that stays"") deeply trained into the model" | Excellent |
| Avoiding pathologising | Explicit system prompt constraints + targeted training data | Very Strong |
| Respecting neurodivergence | "Training data and Atlas framework explicitly include masking, shutdowns, executive dysfunction, sensory issues, etc." | Strong |
| Avoiding generic crisis pivots | Hard constraint in both training data and system prompt design | Excellent |