Downloads · 30 days
22
23% of all-time downloads
gplsi/Toxicity_model_Llama_3.1_8B
Toxicity_model_Llama_3.1_8B is a text generation model from gplsi. Use it when you need the model to write or continue text. It is set up for transformers. The card lists the license as apache-2.0.
This model is an instruction-tuned version of LLaMA 3.1 8B Instruct, specifically trained to classify the toxicity level of Spanish-language user comments on news articles. It distinguishes between three categories:
Downloads · 30 days
22
23% of all-time downloads
All-time downloads
97
Public
Parameters
8B
16.1 GB on disk
Likes
1
Public
Click a slice to open those files.
.safetensors16.1 GB · 100%
From the Hugging Face model README
This model is an instruction-tuned version of LLaMA 3.1 8B Instruct, specifically trained to classify the toxicity level of Spanish-language user comments on news articles. It distinguishes between three categories:
The model follows instruction-based prompts and returns a single classification label in response.
The model was fine-tuned on the SocialTOX dataset, a collection of Spanish-language comments annotated for varying levels of toxicity. These comments come from news platforms and represent real-world scenarios of online discourse.
The model expects input in a structured conversational format like the one below:
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert in detecting toxicity in comments, and your goal is to classify comments based on their level of toxicity. The comments were made on news articles. The toxicity categories are:
Slightly toxic: Comments that express sarcasm, irony, or rhetorical questions, but do not directly attack or degrade others.
Toxic: Comments that contain derogatory or pejorative language, inappropriate jokes, fearmongering, denial of facts, threats, personal attacks, insults, degradation, or racist or sexist language. Only classify a comment as “toxic” if it contains clear attack language, direct insults, or demeaning references.
Non-toxic: Neutral or critical comments that do not include Toxic or Slightly toxic elements. Note that negative or critical comments (those with a serious or discontented tone) are Not toxic or Slightly toxic unless they meet the criteria of the categories above.
Please write the corresponding category immediately after the word 'answer.' In case of doubt between two labels, choose the one with the lowest or no toxicity level."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Text: "Narco-Bolivarian Communism"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Toxic"
}
]
The model was evaluated on a held-out test set of 968 manually annotated comments. Below are the confusion matrix and classification metrics:
| Non-toxic | Slightly Toxic | Toxic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-toxic | 325 | 52 | 62 |
| Slightly Toxic | 116 | 257 | 8 |
| Toxic | 67 | 12 | 69 |
| Class | Precision | Recall | F1-score | Support |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-toxic | 0.8006 | 0.6745 | 0.7322 | 381 |
| Slightly toxic | 0.6398 | 0.7403 | 0.6864 | 439 |
| Toxic | 0.4964 | 0.4662 | 0.4808 | 148 |
| Accuracy | 0.6725 | 968 | ||
| Macro average | 0.6456 | 0.6270 | 0.6331 | 968 |
| Weighted average | 0.6812 | 0.6725 | 0.6730 | 968 |
Macro F1-score: 0.6331