Downloads · 30 days
5
29% of all-time downloads
gnitoahc/ceed-b2
ceed-b2 is a image-text-to-text model from gnitoahc. Use it for the image-text-to-text task on the model card, and read the license before you ship it in a product. It is set up for transformers. The card lists the license as gemma.
A LoRA fine-tune of google/gemma-4-e4b-it trained with cross-entropy plus top-k logit distillation from the teacher. The teacher is the sparse mixture-of-experts google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it.
Downloads · 30 days
5
29% of all-time downloads
All-time downloads
17
Public
Parameters
7.9B
15.9 GB on disk
Likes
0
Public
Click a slice to open those files.
.safetensors15.9 GB · 100%
From the Hugging Face model README
A LoRA fine-tune of google/gemma-4-e4b-it
trained with cross-entropy plus top-k logit distillation from the teacher.
The teacher is the sparse mixture-of-experts google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it.
The adapter has been folded into the base weights, so this is a standalone checkpoint: load it exactly like the base model, with no PEFT and no CEED code.
This is Group B2 of the CEED study (Causal Expert–Evidence Distillation), a research artifact published for reproducibility. It is not a product.
from transformers import AutoModelForImageTextToText, AutoProcessor
model = AutoModelForImageTextToText.from_pretrained("gnitoahc/ceed-b2", dtype="float16")
processor = AutoProcessor.from_pretrained("gnitoahc/ceed-b2")
The model was trained and scored with a short-answer instruction in the prompt.
Without it an instruction-tuned model answers "The total written in the image is **28**." against gold "28" and scores zero on every metric here.
| Corpus | chartqa 2,500, docvqa 5,349, gqa 10,000 (17,849 examples, 80/10/10 split by example id) |
| Passes over the training split | 2.69 |
| Adapter | LoRA rank 4 |
| Final cross-entropy | 0.9816 |
| Final KD term | 2.3852 |
| Seed | 0 |
| Run identity | 575ea8aeee645401277edca0c6555326879f72291a6ac8330f8170dd80b922ee |
| Dataset | Metric | Score | n |
|---|---|---|---|
| docvqa | ANLS | 0.8506 | 565 |
| gqa | exact match | 0.6191 | 1016 |
| chartqa | relaxed accuracy | 0.5783 | 249 |
Scored by CEED's own harness (harness_version: ceed-direct-1)
with greedy decoding, on CEED's own 10% validation split.
These numbers are not comparable to published DocVQA / GQA / ChartQA leaderboard results. Different splits, different prompt, different decoding. They are meaningful only against the other CEED Groups, which were scored identically.
kd_weight: 0, scored above this checkpoint on every dataset (docvqa 0.8506 vs 0.8798; gqa 0.6191 vs 0.6959; chartqa 0.5783 vs 0.7871). Whatever this checkpoint's objective contributes, it is not visible as an advantage over supervised fine-tuning here.ceed_provenance.json beside the weights carries the source run's identity,
parameter-efficiency mode, and metrics.