Downloads · 30 days
7.5K
11% of all-time downloads
geoffmunn/Qwen3-14B-f16
Qwen3-14B-f16 is a text generation model from geoffmunn. Use it when you need the model to write or continue text. The card lists the license as apache-2.0.
This is a GGUF-quantized version of the Qwen/Qwen3-14B language model — a 14-billion-parameter LLM with deep reasoning, research-grade accuracy, and autonomous workflows. Converted for use with \llama.cpp\, LM Studio,…
Downloads · 30 days
7.5K
11% of all-time downloads
All-time downloads
69.7K
Public
Repo size
355 GB
Likes
3
Public
Click a slice to open those files.
.gguf215 GB · 100%
From the Hugging Face model README
This is a GGUF-quantized version of the Qwen/Qwen3-14B language model — a 14-billion-parameter LLM with deep reasoning, research-grade accuracy, and autonomous workflows. Converted for use with \llama.cpp, LM Studio, OpenWebUI, GPT4All, and more.
The Qwen3-14B model delivers serious intelligence in a locally runnable package, offering near-flagship performance while remaining feasible to run on a single high-end consumer GPU or a well-equipped CPU setup. It’s the optimal choice when you need strong reasoning, robust code generation, and deep language understanding—without relying on the cloud or massive infrastructure.
Choose Qwen3-14B when you’ve outgrown 7B–8B models but still want to run efficiently offline—balancing capability, control, and cost without sacrificing quality.
At 14B scale, quantization achieves exceptional resilience—all bit widths deliver production-ready quality with imatrix, and even Q2_K becomes viable (+13.1% loss). The model's parameter redundancy provides a "sweet spot" where aggressive compression meets robust architecture. Q5_K_M + imatrix achieves near-lossless fidelity (+0.59% vs F16), while Q4_K_M + imatrix offers the best balance of quality, speed, and compatibility:
| Bit Width | Best Variant (+ imatrix) | Quality vs F16 | File Size | Speed | Memory | Viability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q5_K | Q5_K_M + imatrix | +0.59% ✅✅✅ | 9.55 GiB | 63.81 TPS | 10,021 MiB | Exceptional |
| Q4_K | Q4_K_M + imatrix | +1.2% ✅✅ | 8.38 GiB | 72.89 TPS | 8,581 MiB | Excellent |
| Q3_K | Q3_K_HIFI + imatrix | +2.5% ✅ | 7.93 GiB | 63.93 TPS | 8,120 MiB | Very Good |
| Q2_K | Q2_K + imatrix | +13.1% ⚠️ | 5.35 GiB | 102.80 TPS | 6,340 MiB | Fair (viable) |
💡 Critical insight: 14B represents the inflection point where Q2_K becomes genuinely viable with imatrix (+13.1% loss vs +35% at 1.7B). Q5_K_M + imatrix achieves near-lossless quality (+0.59%), while Q4_K_M + imatrix provides the best practical balance. All variants are production-ready with imatrix.
→ Q5_K_M + imatrix
→ Q4_K_M + imatrix
→ Q2_K + imatrix
→ Q3_K_HIFI + imatrix
→ Q3_K_S + imatrix
⚠️ Q4_K_HIFI + imatrix is counterproductive — imatrix degrades quality by +0.6% (9.0847 → 9.1393 PPL). This is unique to 14B scale.
⚠️ Q5_K_HIFI provides zero advantage at 14B:
⚠️ Q2_K requires imatrix — Without it, Q2_K suffers +31.5% precision loss (poor quality). With imatrix, quality improves to +13.1% — viable for non-critical tasks.
⚠️ Q2_K_HIFI is strictly worse than Q2_K — At 14B scale, Q2_K_HIFI loses to Q2_K on every metric (quality, speed, size, memory). Always prefer standard Q2_K over Q2_K_HIFI.
⚠️ imatrix impact is minimal at 14B — Unlike smaller models where imatrix recovers 60–78% of lost precision, at 14B the gains are modest (0.1–2.6%):
| Available VRAM | Recommended Variant | Expected Quality | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| < 6.5 GiB | Q2_K + imatrix | PPL 10.20, +13.1% loss ⚠️ | Only option that fits; quality acceptable for non-critical tasks |
| 6.5 – 8.2 GiB | Q3_K_S + imatrix | PPL 9.60, +6.5% loss ⚠️ | Only option that fits; quality acceptable for non-critical tasks |
| 8.2 – 10.1 GiB | Q4_K_M + imatrix | PPL 9.12, +1.2% loss ✅ | Best balance of quality/speed/size; standard compatibility |
| 10.1 – 12.0 GiB | Q5_K_M + imatrix | PPL 9.07, +0.59% loss ✅ | Near-lossless quality; best precision available |
| > 12.0 GiB | F16 or Q5_K_M + imatrix | PPL 9.01 or 9.07 | F16 only if absolute precision required |
| Priority | Q2_K Best | Q3_K Best | Q4_K Best | Q5_K Best | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality (with imat) | Q2_K (+13.1%) | Q3_K_HIFI (+2.5%) | Q4_K_M (+1.2%) | Q5_K_M (+0.59%) ✅ | Q5_K_M |
| Speed | Q2_K (102.80 TPS) ✅ | Q3_K_S (91.32 TPS) | Q4_K_S (76.34 TPS) | Q5_K_S (65.40 TPS) | Q2_K |
| Smallest Size | Q2_K (5.35 GiB) ✅ | Q3_K_S (6.19 GiB) | Q4_K_S (7.98 GiB) | Q5_K_S (9.33 GiB) | Q2_K |
| Best Balance | Q2_K + imat | Q3_K_M + imat | Q4_K_M + imat ✅ | Q5_K_M + imat | Q4_K_M |
✅ = Recommended for general use
⚠️ = Context-dependent (see warnings above)
Model redundancy threshold: 14B represents the inflection point where parameter count provides sufficient redundancy that quantization errors average out rather than accumulating. Below 8B, quality degrades more rapidly; above 14B, gains plateau.
Q2_K viability threshold: 14B is the smallest scale where Q2_K becomes genuinely viable with imatrix (+13.1% loss). At 8B, Q2_K + imatrix is +13.4%; at 4B, +18.7%; at 1.7B, +35.0%. This demonstrates a clear scale-dependent improvement curve.
Q3_K viability milestone: 14B is the smallest scale where Q3_K_HIFI achieves truly production-ready quality (+2.5% with imatrix). At 8B, Q3_K_HIFI is +3.5%; at 4B, +5.9%; at 1.7B, +3.4% but with much higher baseline PPL.
imatrix diminishing returns: At 14B, imatrix effectiveness plateaus — Q3_K_HIFI improves by only 0.1%, Q4_K_M by 0.1%, Q5_K variants by 1.1–1.3%. This contrasts sharply with 0.6B (40–48% recovery) and 1.7B (60–78% recovery).
Q4_K_HIFI paradox: Unlike at 8B (where imatrix helps Q4_K_HIFI by -1.1%) or 32B (where it helps by -0.7%), at 14B imatrix harms Q4_K_HIFI (+0.6%). This demonstrates non-linear scale effects in quantization behavior.
Q5_K_HIFI irrelevance: At 14B, residual quantization provides no measurable benefit — the model's inherent robustness makes the extra precision unnecessary. This changes at 32B where Q5_K_HIFI + imatrix achieves F16-equivalence.
Need best quality?
├─ Yes → Q5_K_M + imatrix (+0.59% loss)
└─ No → Need max speed?
├─ Yes → Q2_K + imatrix (102.80 TPS, +13.1% loss)
└─ No → Need smallest size?
├─ Yes → Memory < 8 GiB?
│ ├─ Yes → Q3_K_S + imatrix (6,339 MiB, +6.5% loss)
│ └─ No → Q2_K + imatrix (6,340 MiB, +13.1% loss, fastest)
└─ No → Q4_K_M + imatrix (best balance, +1.2% loss, standard build)
→ Q4_K_M + imatrix
Delivers excellent quality (+1.2% vs F16), strong speed (72.89 TPS), compact size (8.38 GiB), and universal llama.cpp compatibility. The safe, practical choice for 90% of deployments.
→ Q5_K_M + imatrix
Achieves near-lossless quantization (+0.59% vs F16) with 64% memory reduction and 2.5× speedup. Standard compatibility makes it preferable to Q5_K_HIFI, which offers no advantage.
→ Q3_K_M + imatrix
Best Q3 balance (+2.9% vs F16) with smallest viable footprint (6,973 MiB). Production-ready even without imatrix (+5.7% loss) — valuable for environments where imatrix generation isn't feasible.
→ Q2_K + imatrix
Fastest variant (102.80 TPS, +299% vs F16) with acceptable quality (+13.1% loss). Ideal when every TPS matters and marginal quality differences are acceptable.
→ Q3_K_HIFI + imatrix
Demonstrates that 3-bit quantization can achieve near-lossless quality (+2.5% loss) on sufficiently large models. Valuable for characterizing the lower bounds of viable quantization.
| Scenario | Recommended Variant | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Default / General Purpose | Q4_K_M + imatrix | Best balance of quality (+1.2%), speed (72.89 TPS), size (8.38 GiB), and compatibility |
| Maximum Quality | Q5_K_M + imatrix | Near-lossless (+0.59% vs F16) with standard toolchain |
| Maximum Speed | Q2_K + imatrix | Fastest (102.80 TPS, +299% vs F16) with acceptable quality (+13.1% loss) |
| Minimum Size | Q2_K + imatrix | Smallest footprint (5.35 GiB) with acceptable quality |
| No imatrix available | Q4_K_HIFI (no imat) | Best quality without imatrix (+0.8% vs F16) |
| Extreme constraints | Q3_K_S + imatrix | Only if memory < 8 GiB; +6.5% loss acceptable |
⚠️ Golden rules for 14B:
✅ 14B is the quantization resilience milestone: Large enough for robustness across all bit widths, small enough for dramatic efficiency gains. This scale demonstrates that intelligent quantization can deliver near-F16 quality at 1/3 the memory with 2.5–4× speed — a compelling value proposition for nearly all deployments.
NOTE: This analysis does not include the HIFI models.
There are two good candidates: Qwen3-14B-f16:Q3_K_S and Qwen3-14B-f16:Q5_K_M. These cover the full range of temperatures and are good at all question types.
Another good option would be Qwen3-14B-f16:Q3_K_M, with good finishes across the temperature range.
Qwen3-14B-f16:Q2_K got very good results and would have been a 1st or 2nd place candidate but was the only model to fail the 'hello' question which it should have passed.
You can read the results here: Qwen3-14b-analysis.md
If you find this useful, please give the project a ❤️ like.
| Level | Speed | Size | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q2_K | ⚡ Fastest | 5.75 GB | An excellent option but it failed the 'hello' test. Use with caution. |
| 🥇 Q3_K_S | ⚡ Fast | 6.66 GB | 🥇 Best overall model. Two first places and two 3rd places. Excellent results across the full temperature range. |
| 🥉 Q3_K_M | ⚡ Fast | 7.32 GB | 🥉 A good option - it came 1st and 3rd, covering both ends of the temperature range. |
| Q4_K_S | 🚀 Fast | 8.57 GB | Not recommended, two 2nd places in low temperature questions with no other appearances. |
| Q4_K_M | 🚀 Fast | 9.00 GB | Not recommended. A single 3rd place with no other appearances. |
| 🥈 Q5_K_S | 🐢 Medium | 10.3 GB | 🥈 A very good second place option. A top 3 finisher across the full temperature range. |
| Q5_K_M | 🐢 Medium | 10.5 GB | Not recommended. A single 3rd place with no other appearances. |
| Q6_K | 🐌 Slow | 12.1 GB | Not recommended. No top 3 finishes at all. |
| Q8_0 | 🐌 Slow | 15.7 GB | Not recommended. A single 2nd place with no other appearances. |
You can read the guide for building llama.cpp here: HIFI_BUILD_GUIDE.md.
The HIFI quantization also used a very large 4697 chunk imatrix file for extra precision. You can re-use it here: Qwen3-14B-f16-imatrix-4697-generic.gguf
The imatrix was created as a generic mix of Wikipedia, mathmatics, and coding examples.
You can use the HIFI GitHub repository to build it from source if you're interested: https://github.com/geoffmunn/llama.cpp.
Build notes: HIFI_BUILD_GUIDE.md
Improvements and feedback are welcome.
Load this model using:
llama.cppEach quantized model includes its own README.md and shares a common MODELFILE for optimal configuration.
Importing directly into Ollama should work, but you might encounter this error: Error: invalid character '<' looking for beginning of value.
In this case try these steps:
wget https://huggingface.co/geoffmunn/Qwen3-14B/resolve/main/Qwen3-14B-f16%3AQ3_K_S.gguf (replace the quantised version with the one you want)nano Modelfile and enter these details (again, replacing Q3_K_S with the version you want):FROM ./Qwen3-14B-f16:Q3_K_S.gguf
# Chat template using ChatML (used by Qwen)
SYSTEM You are a helpful assistant
TEMPLATE "{{ if .System }}<|im_start|>system
{{ .System }}<|im_end|>{{ end }}<|im_start|>user
{{ .Prompt }}<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
"
PARAMETER stop <|im_start|>
PARAMETER stop <|im_end|>
# Default sampling
PARAMETER temperature 0.6
PARAMETER top_p 0.95
PARAMETER top_k 20
PARAMETER min_p 0.0
PARAMETER repeat_penalty 1.1
PARAMETER num_ctx 4096
The num_ctx value has been dropped to increase speed significantly.
ollama create Qwen3-14B-f16:Q3_K_S -f ModelfileYou will now see "Qwen3-14B-f16:Q3_K_S" in your Ollama model list.
These import steps are also useful if you want to customise the default parameters or system prompt.
👤 Geoff Munn (@geoffmunn)
🔗 Hugging Face Profile
This is a community conversion for local inference. Not affiliated with Alibaba Cloud or the Qwen team.