Downloads · 30 days
17
26% of all-time downloads
dudeman2512/Muse-Glimmer-30B-abliterated
Muse-Glimmer-30B-abliterated is a image-text-to-text model from dudeman2512. Use it for the image-text-to-text task on the model card, and read the license before you ship it in a product. It is set up for transformers. The card lists the license as other.
Muse-Glimmer-30B with its refusal direction removed, produced with Heretic. BF16, 13 shards, 59.55 GB.
Downloads · 30 days
17
26% of all-time downloads
All-time downloads
66
Public
Parameters
29.8B
59.6 GB on disk
Likes
0
Public
Click a slice to open those files.
.safetensors59.6 GB · 100%
From the Hugging Face model README
Muse-Glimmer-30B with its refusal direction removed, produced with Heretic. BF16, 13 shards, 59.55 GB.
Abliteration identifies the direction in the model's residual stream that corresponds to refusing a request, and subtracts that component from the weights. It is a direct edit to the checkpoint, not fine-tuning: no gradient steps, no training data.
| Refusals, original | 2348 / 7011 (33.49%) |
| Refusals, abliterated | 88 / 7011 (1.26%) |
| Refusals removed | 96.3% |
| KL divergence vs original | 0.2241 |
KL divergence measures how far the abliterated model's next-token distribution has moved from the original on prompts it would never have refused — the collateral cost of the edit. Heretic warns that values above ~0.5 usually indicate significant damage to the original model's capabilities; this is well under half that.
Heretic's abliteration is parameterised by how hard to cut, where in the layer stack the cut peaks, how far it spreads, and which layer the refusal direction is read from. Those interact, so the configuration was selected by search rather than by hand, in two stages:
The second stage was not a formality. Refusal count is a rare-event count, so a 1,000-prompt estimate is noisy: candidates the first stage ranked 23 against 34 came back 261 against 259 when measured properly — a genuine inversion. KL, being a smooth statistic, reproduced almost exactly at both sample sizes.
The winning configuration removed 3× more refusals than the runner-up while doing less damage to the model (KL 0.224 against 0.334), so it is not simply the most aggressive setting available.
| attn.o_proj | mlp.down_proj | |
|---|---|---|
| max_weight | 1.478300 | 1.411696 |
| max_weight_position | 37.196841 | 33.810336 |
| min_weight | 1.411191 | 1.407139 |
| min_weight_distance | 29.973070 | 25.019048 |
Direction scope global, direction index 36.589359.
Note that min_weight is nearly equal to max_weight in both components: the
winning cut is close to uniform across the layers it touches, rather than a
narrow peak.
Verified before publication: 13 shards in the index, 13 on disk, no missing shards, no orphans, declared size matching the bytes on disk exactly, and every shard's safetensors header parsing with precisely the tensor names its index entry claims.
vllm serve dudeman2512/Muse-Glimmer-30B-abliterated
This model has had its refusal behaviour removed. It will attempt requests the original declines. Whatever guardrails you need belong at the application layer. I'm not responsible for what or how you use it for and it is not designed for malicious use cases.