Downloads · 30 days
33
28% of all-time downloads
cmboulanger/nuextract3-toc
nuextract3-toc is a image-text-to-text model from cmboulanger. Use it for the image-text-to-text task on the model card, and read the license before you ship it in a product. It is set up for transformers. The card lists the license as cc0-1.0.
NuExtract3 (a Qwen3.5-based vision-language model), LoRA fine-tuned to extract structured table-of-contents entries from scanned TOC page images:
Downloads · 30 days
33
28% of all-time downloads
All-time downloads
119
Public
Parameters
4.5B
9.1 GB on disk
Likes
2
Public
Click a slice to open those files.
.safetensors9.1 GB · 100%
From the Hugging Face model README
NuExtract3 (a Qwen3.5-based vision-language model), LoRA fine-tuned to extract structured table-of-contents entries from scanned TOC page images:
{
"entries": [
{
"title": "Vorwort",
"authors": [],
"printed_page_number": "vii",
"skip": true
},
{
"title": "1. Introduction",
"authors": ["Jane Doe"],
"printed_page_number": "1",
"skip": false
}
]
}
skip marks a line that isn't an actual chapter — front matter (e.g.
a preface, list of contributors), back matter (e.g. bibliography,
index), or a part/section divider. It's still emitted as its own
entry with its own title/page, never omitted; only its own true/false
correctness is excluded from evaluation's precision/recall/F1 match
key (see "Results" below) — the entry itself is still scored on
title+page like any other.
The adapter has been merged into the base weights, so this checkpoint
is a drop-in replacement for numind/NuExtract3 — same architecture,
same AutoModelForImageTextToText/AutoProcessor loading path, same
template-mode prompt contract (see below). No PEFT dependency needed to
run it.
Trained and evaluated with the pipeline in finetune-nuextract-toc — see that repo's README.md and RESULTS.md for the full training/eval setup, dataset stats, and per-run history. The summary below mirrors its latest entry.
Extracting {title, authors, printed_page_number, skip} entries from a
scanned table-of-contents page (1-3 pages, rendered to an image no
larger than 1200px on its longer side). Trained on German-language
academic book TOCs sourced from the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNB);
expect degraded quality outside that domain (other languages, other
document types, non-TOC pages).
Requires the exact same prompt template and instructions used during
fine-tuning — copy common.py and prepare_data.py's
render_pages_to_pngs from the training repo rather than
reconstructing the prompt by hand, since even small prompt drift will
hurt output quality. Minimal usage:
import json
import torch
from PIL import Image
from transformers import AutoModelForImageTextToText, AutoProcessor
repo_id = "cmboulanger/nuextract3-toc"
processor = AutoProcessor.from_pretrained(repo_id, trust_remote_code=True)
model = AutoModelForImageTextToText.from_pretrained(
repo_id, trust_remote_code=True, dtype=torch.bfloat16
).to("cuda")
template = {"entries": [{"title": "verbatim-string", "authors": ["string"],
"printed_page_number": "verbatim-string", "skip": "boolean"}]}
instructions = "..." # see common.py's _INSTRUCTIONS for the full text
messages = [{"role": "user", "content": [
{"type": "text", "text": "Extract every table-of-contents entry from this page."},
{"type": "image", "image": Image.open("toc-page.png").convert("RGB")},
]}]
inputs = processor.apply_chat_template(
messages, template=json.dumps(template), instructions=instructions,
enable_thinking=False, add_generation_prompt=True,
tokenize=True, return_dict=True, return_tensors="pt",
).to("cuda")
generated = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=4096, do_sample=False)
completion = generated[:, inputs["input_ids"].shape[1]:]
print(processor.batch_decode(completion, skip_special_tokens=True)[0])
Entry-level micro precision/recall/F1 on a 44-book held-out split (a
prediction matches when normalized title and printed_page_number
both match a ground-truth entry):
Baseline (zero-shot numind/NuExtract3) | This checkpoint (LoRA, 3 epochs) | Δ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Precision | 0.6131 | 0.7555 | +0.142 |
| Recall | 0.7590 | 0.7533 | −0.006 |
| F1 | 0.6783 | 0.7544 | +0.076 |
Fine-tuning's gain is almost entirely a precision story: the base
model over-generates (1300 predicted vs. 1050 expected entries);
fine-tuning brought predicted count in line with expected without
giving up recall. Full dataset stats and per-book notes are in
RESULTS.md in the training repo.
624 train / 44 eval books (15,372 / 1,050 TOC entries) from
dnb-toc-ground-truth's
pilot corpus of DNB table-of-contents scans, CC0-1.0 licensed. See the
training repo's dataset_stats.py/RESULTS.md for the full breakdown
(entries/book, page-count distribution, skip ratio).