VoxelModel-v1

<table align="center"> <tr> <td align="center">

<a href="https://huggingface.co/spaces/bench-labs/blog?post=Vm1.html">📝 Blog Post</a>

</td> </tr> </table>

VoxelModel v1 🧊

<img src="examples.png" alt="Twelve 32x32x32 grids generated from text prompts" style="width: 640px; max-width: 100%;">

A tiny text-to-3D diffusion model. You give it a prompt, it gives you a 32x32x32 occupancy grid. It is 40,050,892 trained parameters and it trained in under ten hours on a single A100.

This is the PixelModel line stepping out of 2D. v1 through v4 were tiny latent diffusion for images; VoxelModel keeps the same argument (low resolution as a deliberate aesthetic, not a compromise) and applies it to shape. model.png is still here and still holds every weight, because that gimmick ports unchanged to 3D: it only ever cared about floats.

<a href="https://hfviewer.com/bench-labs/voxelmodel-v1?utm_source=huggingface&amp;utm_medium=embedded_model_card&amp;utm_campaign=bench-labs__voxelmodel-v1_card&amp;utm_content=embedded_card_open_viewer&amp;from=embedded-model-card" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> <img src="https://hfviewer.com/api/card.svg?source=bench-labs%2Fvoxelmodel-v1&amp;granularity=auto&amp;v=20260516-title-pills-card" alt="Architecture graph for bench-labs/voxelmodel-v1. Open in hfviewer" width="100%" /> </a>

The one honest result

It works for bulky objects and it fails for thin ones.

Chairs, benches, tables, mushrooms, trees, cars and boats come back legible. A sword comes back as 0.2% occupancy, which is a handful of stray voxels, and a key comes back as a featureless bar.

That is not a training failure. A sword does not survive voxelization at 32^3 in the training data either: the real Objaverse sword we voxelized for reference sits at 2.9% occupancy and reads as a cross at best. The model reproduced what it was shown. If you want swords, the answer is resolution, not more steps.

So: 32^3 is enough, for a specific and checkable definition of enough. That was the question v1 existed to answer.

No VAE

VoxelModel operates directly on voxels, so there is no autoencoder in the stack. Total footprint is 40.05M trained plus 37.8M frozen CLIP ViT-B/32, which is 77.9M. PixelModel v4 was 161M for comparable trained size, because it carries an 83.7M frozen sd-vae-ft-mse. This one is tiny without an asterisk.

Architecture

VoxelDiT is a DiT with 3D patchify. A 32^3 grid at patch 4 gives 512 tokens, dim 384, depth 12, heads 6. Conditioning is cross-attention on frozen CLIP ViT-B/32 text features (40 tokens), plus adaLN-zero from the pooled embedding and the timestep. Positional encoding is a 3D sincos over the 8x8x8 patch grid.

Objective is rectified flow with target = x1 - x0 and logit-normal timestep sampling, t = sigmoid(randn).

Training

Held-out loss bottomed at 0.018737 at step 64,000 and drifted up to 0.019314 by step 90,000. That is 3.08% of overfitting, and it means the run was about 2.8 hours longer than it needed to be. 90,000 steps over 28,415 meshes is 811 epochs with no augmentation, which is the obvious thing to fix next. Yaw rotations plus a mirror would give 8x for free on a cubic grid.

The shipped weights are the step 90,000 EMA, not the step 64,000 best, because checkpoints were written to a fixed path and overwrote each other. Noted, and worth 3.08% to you if you retrain.

Data

Meshes are dylanebert/objaverse-lowpoly-obj, captions are tiange/Cap3D, joined on Objaverse UID for 58,374 captioned meshes. Voxelization centers on the vertex mean, scales by max absolute coordinate, and rasterizes surfaces at pitch 2/31 with no fill, since filling solidifies closed volumes and pushes 4% of the set past 90% occupancy.

caption_filter.py then throws away half of it. Multi-object meshes are the main defect in this corpus: normalization scales the whole scene bounding box into the grid, so a mesh holding several objects shrinks each one into a cluster of blobs. The caption gives this away before you load anything, so the filter rejects scene and variant-set wording, a top level and joining two noun phrases, and captions over 12 words. Colour pairs survive on purpose, so "a purple and green mushroom" is kept and "a white cube and a white robot" is not.

Measured over all 58,374 captions, 29,439 survive, which is 50.4%.

Worth knowing if you build on this: occupancy does not detect the defect. Survivors and rejects have almost the same occupancy distribution, medians 4.3% against 5.0% over a 900 mesh sample. No threshold would have caught it.

Usage

python sample.py "a wooden chair" "a purple mushroom" --cfg 5.0 --steps 50

Writes a JSON of base64 np.packbits grids. To load the weights from the PNG instead of the safetensors:

from png_codec import load_model_png
model = load_model_png("model.png", "model_png.json", device="cuda")

Round-trip error against the safetensors is 9.7e-04 max absolute, which is fp16 quantization and nothing else.

What v1 does not do

Colour. These meshes carry no vertex colours and no .mtl files, so the model generates grey geometry only. Colour needs a GLB-with-materials source and its own voxelization path.

A real eval metric. FID does not transfer to 3D. Held-out rectified flow loss is what the table above reports, and it is a training diagnostic, not a quality measure. Rendered-FID with CLIP score on 2D renders, or IoU against a held-out split, are the candidates. This is unresolved and we would rather say so than publish a number we do not believe.

Files