Downloads · 30 days
0
alfred361/laya-multilingual-typed-decisions
laya-multilingual-typed-decisions is a text classification model from alfred361. Use it when you need a label for a piece of text. It is set up for transformers. The card lists the license as apache-2.0.
convaiinnovations/laya-multilingual (mmBERT-base, 322M) fine-tuned on LocalLLaMA/typed-decisions with the authors' own recipe, unchanged except for the base model.
Downloads · 30 days
0
Access
Public
Updated Sep 21, 2026
Parameters
322M
678 MB on disk
Likes
4
Public
Click a slice to open those files.
.safetensors644 MB · 95%
From the Hugging Face model README
convaiinnovations/laya-multilingual (mmBERT-base, 322M) fine-tuned on
LocalLLaMA/typed-decisions
with the authors' own recipe, unchanged except for the base model.
The English base already had a fine-tune of this kind; the multilingual one did not.
400 test cases, 2000 decisions, official test split.
| model | accuracy | Brier | ECE | score MAE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| this checkpoint | 0.749 | 0.063 | 0.112 | 0.247 |
laya-multilingual before this fine-tune | 0.352 | |||
| teacher self-agreement ceiling | 0.735 | |||
| TypeSafe Jev 1.13.0 (published) | 0.727 | 0.148 | 0.144 | 0.391 |
| per-question majority class | 0.461 | |||
laya-typed-decisions, English (published) | 0.766 | 0.062 | 0.213 | 0.242 |
0.352 is measured here, not quoted: the base model was run over the
same test split through the same code before training, which is also what makes the
before/after a single comparison rather than two harnesses. The published figure for that
base is 0.342, so the harness agrees with upstream to within 0.01.
Accuracy lands 1.8 points below the English fine-tune and above both the published Jev
number and the teacher ceiling. Calibration is the larger difference: ECE
0.112 against the English fine-tune's 0.213. That is not a better training run --
the English checkpoint ships temperature_by_options inherited from its own base, which
overrides the temperatures fitted for it, and its card says so. This one has
temperature_by_options: {} and temperatures fitted at the end of training.
| workflow | accuracy |
|---|---|
| agent trace observability | 0.720 |
| customer service | 0.736 |
| invoice processing | 0.792 |
| security incidents | 0.746 |
The training split is English only. This is a multilingual encoder taught English decisions, and the benchmark has no non-English cases, so nothing here says whether the multilingual property survived. Treat cross-lingual use as untested rather than supported until somebody measures it -- the right metric is agreement between languages on the same case, which needs no new labels, only translated questions.
Inherited from the base and the data: this is a specialist in four synthetic workflows (agent traces, customer service, invoice processing, security incidents). Outside them, expect the base checkpoint's behaviour.
71.4 ms per case at p50 on a T4. 4 epochs, 2xT4 DDP, RLCD with a
strictly proper scoring rule, temperatures refitted afterwards -- the recipe from
laya_finetune_typed_decisions_2xT4_kaggle.ipynb,
with MODEL_ID pointed at the multilingual base.
Apache-2.0, as upstream. Base model and recipe by Convai Innovations; benchmark by LocalLLaMA.