Downloads · 30 days
371
41% of all-time downloads
acon96/Little-Titles-GGUF
Little-Titles-GGUF is a machine learning model from acon96. Use it for the machine learning task on the model card, and read the license before you ship it in a product. The card lists the license as apache-2.0.
This repository contains GGUF quantizations of acon96/Little-Titles, a fine-tuned Qwen/Qwen3.5-0.8B-Base model for producing concise, descriptive titles for user requests. GGUF files are intended for llama.cpp and oth…
Downloads · 30 days
371
41% of all-time downloads
All-time downloads
897
Public
Repo size
6.6 GB
Likes
0
Public
Click a slice to open those files.
.gguf6.6 GB · 100%
From the Hugging Face model README
This repository contains GGUF quantizations of
acon96/Little-Titles, a fine-tuned Qwen/Qwen3.5-0.8B-Base model for producing concise, descriptive titles for user requests. GGUF files are intended for llama.cpp and other GGUF-compatible runtimes.
The embedded chat template accepts exactly one user message. It may be preceded by one system message. Multi-turn conversations, prior assistant messages, and tools are not supported. To title a complete conversation, serialize or summarize it into the content of that one user message.
When no system message is supplied, the template uses the instruction:
Generate a short title describing the following user request.
Start a local OpenAI-compatible server:
llama-server -hf acon96/Little-Titles-GGUF:Q8_0
--host 0.0.0.0 \
--port 8000
Then submit one user message to /v1/chat/completions:
curl http://localhost:8000/v1/chat/completions \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Help me plan a three-day trip to Kyoto."}],
"temperature": 0.8,
"max_tokens": 32
}'
These GGUF files are quantized derivatives of
acon96/Little-Titles. The
source model's training configuration is available at
training-config.yml.
It fine-tunes on SupraLabs/chat-titles-filtered-115K using Axolotl.
We compare Little Titles with a reference title supplied by the ogrnz/chat-titles dataset. Gemma 4 26B A4B rated each pair for accuracy, relevance, and concise usefulness.
Across 10,000 paired judgments, Little Titles won 4,831 comparisons versus 3,531 reference-title wins (1,638 ties). Its decisive-pair win rate was 57.8% (95% CI: 56.7%–58.8%; exact one-sided sign test $p = 2.81 \times 10^{-46}$), so it was preferred more often than the reference title in this evaluation.
This is exploratory evidence: Little Titles was always Candidate A, so candidate-position bias may affect this result.