Downloads · 30 days
0
VictorTishkevich/pokemon-automl-model
pokemon-automl-model is a machine learning model from VictorTishkevich. Use it for the machine learning task on the model card, and read the license before you ship it in a product.
This model classifies Pokémon from the 151 generation dataset as Common (0) or Rare (1). It trains a tabular classifier with AutoGluon Tabular for the Carnegie Mellon University 24-679 course.
Downloads · 30 days
0
Access
Public
Updated Sep 23, 2026
Repo size
1.3 MB
Likes
0
Public
Click a slice to open those files.
.zip651 KB · 97%
From the Hugging Face model README
This model classifies Pokémon from the 151 generation dataset as Common (0) or Rare (1). It trains a tabular classifier with AutoGluon Tabular for the Carnegie Mellon University 24-679 course.
The intended use is teaching tabular data preprocessing, AutoML classification, and evaluation. It classifies rarity based on numeric attributes (HP, attack count, retreat cost) and categorical features (type, stage, ability).
Supply a pandas DataFrame with features hp, attack_count, retreat_cost, type, stage, and has_ability. predict() returns 0 (Common) or 1 (Rare), and predict_proba() returns class probabilities.
| Label | Meaning |
|---|---|
0 | Common |
1 | Rare |
Source: pakiino/2026-24679-pokemon-151-tabular-hw1.
| Partition | Total |
|---|---|
| Training | 336 |
| Validation | 4 |
| Test | 5 |
| Training setting | Recorded value |
|---|---|
| Framework | AutoGluon Tabular 1.6.1 |
| Target | label |
| Problem type | binary |
| Preset | medium_quality |
| Selection metric | Balanced accuracy |
| Fit budget | 300 seconds |
| Best Model | WeightedEnsemble_L2 (NeuralNetTorch) |
| Recorded environment | Linux; Python 3.13.15; PyTorch 2.11.0+cpu |
The course notebook reports 19.66 seconds of total training time. The best model achieved a validation score (balanced_accuracy) of 1.0 on the 4 validation rows.
| Test metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Test size | 5 original responses |
| One error change | 20.0 percentage points |
| Training-majority baseline predicts | Common |
This small test set of 5 examples is not a comprehensive evaluation. Broader use requires a larger evaluation dataset.